Skip to main content
  • AACR Publications
    • Blood Cancer Discovery
    • Cancer Discovery
    • Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention
    • Cancer Immunology Research
    • Cancer Prevention Research
    • Cancer Research
    • Clinical Cancer Research
    • Molecular Cancer Research
    • Molecular Cancer Therapeutics

AACR logo

  • Register
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Advertisement

Main menu

  • Home
  • About
    • The Journal
    • AACR Journals
    • Subscriptions
    • Permissions and Reprints
  • Articles
    • OnlineFirst
    • Current Issue
    • Past Issues
    • Rapid Impact Archive
    • Meeting Abstracts
    • Collections
      • COVID-19 & Cancer Resource Center
      • Metabolism Collection
      • Editors' Picks
      • "Best of" Collection
  • For Authors
    • Information for Authors
    • Author Services
    • Best of: Author Profiles
    • Spotlight on Genomic Analysis of Rare and Understudied Cancers
    • Submit
  • Alerts
    • Table of Contents
    • Editors' Picks
    • OnlineFirst
    • Citation
    • Author/Keyword
    • RSS Feeds
    • My Alert Summary & Preferences
  • News
    • Cancer Discovery News
  • COVID-19
  • Webinars
  • Search More

    Advanced Search

  • AACR Publications
    • Blood Cancer Discovery
    • Cancer Discovery
    • Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention
    • Cancer Immunology Research
    • Cancer Prevention Research
    • Cancer Research
    • Clinical Cancer Research
    • Molecular Cancer Research
    • Molecular Cancer Therapeutics

User menu

  • Register
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Molecular Cancer Research
Molecular Cancer Research
  • Home
  • About
    • The Journal
    • AACR Journals
    • Subscriptions
    • Permissions and Reprints
  • Articles
    • OnlineFirst
    • Current Issue
    • Past Issues
    • Rapid Impact Archive
    • Meeting Abstracts
    • Collections
      • COVID-19 & Cancer Resource Center
      • Metabolism Collection
      • Editors' Picks
      • "Best of" Collection
  • For Authors
    • Information for Authors
    • Author Services
    • Best of: Author Profiles
    • Spotlight on Genomic Analysis of Rare and Understudied Cancers
    • Submit
  • Alerts
    • Table of Contents
    • Editors' Picks
    • OnlineFirst
    • Citation
    • Author/Keyword
    • RSS Feeds
    • My Alert Summary & Preferences
  • News
    • Cancer Discovery News
  • COVID-19
  • Webinars
  • Search More

    Advanced Search

Reviews

Relevance of the Bruton Tyrosine Kinase as a Target for COVID-19 Therapy

Miran Rada, Zahraa Qusairy, Marta Massip-Salcedo and Salvador Macip
Miran Rada
1Department of Surgery, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Miran Rada
Zahraa Qusairy
2Department of Pharmacy, Sulaimani Technical Institute, Al Sulaymaniyah, Kurdistan Region, Iraq.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Marta Massip-Salcedo
3FoodLab, Faculty of Health Sciences, Universitat Oberta de Catalunya, Barcelona, Spain.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Salvador Macip
3FoodLab, Faculty of Health Sciences, Universitat Oberta de Catalunya, Barcelona, Spain.
4Mechanisms of Cancer and Ageing Laboratory, Department of Molecular and Cell Biology, University of Leicester, Leicester, England, United Kingdom.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: sm460@le.ac.uk
DOI: 10.1158/1541-7786.MCR-20-0814 Published April 2021
  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

The outbreak of the novel coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) has emerged as one of the biggest global health threats worldwide. As of October 2020, more than 44 million confirmed cases and more than 1,160,000 deaths have been reported globally, and the toll is likely to be much higher before the pandemic is over. There are currently little therapeutic options available and new potential targets are intensively investigated. Recently, Bruton tyrosine kinase (BTK) has emerged as an interesting candidate. Elevated levels of BTK activity have been reported in blood monocytes from patients with severe COVID-19, compared with those from healthy volunteers. Importantly, various studies confirmed empirically that administration of BTK inhibitors (acalabrutinib and ibrutinib) decreased the duration of mechanical ventilation and mortality rate for hospitalized patients with severe COVID-19. Herein, we review the current information regarding the role of BTK in severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 infections and the suitability of its inhibitors as drugs to treat COVID-19. The use of BTK inhibitors in the management of COVID-19 shows promise in reducing the severity of the immune response to the infection and thus mortality. However, BTK inhibition may be contributing in other ways to inhibit the effects of the virus and this will need to be carefully studied.

Introduction

In December 2019, an outbreak of pneumonia cases of unknown origin was reported in Wuhan, the capital of the Hubei Province in P.R. China (1). Soon afterwards, the microbe responsible for this disease was identified as a novel coronavirus by various independent investigators (2–4). The causative agent has since been described as a single-stranded RNA zoonotic virus and named severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), with the disease resulting of the infections being finally called by the World Health Organization as coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19; ref. 5). COVID-19 is a highly contagious disease, due to a basic reproduction number (R0) that has initially been calculated to be close to 2–3 (likely between 1.4 and 6.5), and can be spread by any activity that results in the release of droplets of saliva (such as coughs and sneezes, singing, shouting, or talking), as well as touching a mucosa (such as nose, eyes, or mouth) after being in contact with a contaminated surface (6). As of October 2020, more than 44 million confirmed cases and more than 1,160,000 deaths have been reported globally (https://coronavirus.jhu.edu/map.html). The actual numbers of affected individuals may be much higher, given the fact that many cases go undiagnosed because of lack of testing or being asymptomatic.

Various studies demonstrated that patients with cancer are at high risk of COVID-19 complication and mortality compared with the general population (7–9). Importantly, patients with hematologic malignancies have shown highest levels of mortality from COVID-19 comparing with the rest of cancers (10). Bruton tyrosine kinase (BTK), a key enzyme that has been implicated in various hematologic malignancies (11), is a nonreceptor tyrosine kinase and a member of the Tec family (12). BTK is mutated in the inherited immunodeficiency disease, X-linked agammaglobulinemia (13), a disorder that results in low peripheral blood B cells, low levels of immunoglobulins, and recurring infections (14). BTK has been characterized as a unique therapeutic target in B-cell malignancies, due to its involvement in B-cell maturation (15, 16). BTK inhibition has been a successful field in drug discovery and various small-molecule inhibitors have been developed, including acalabrutinib (17), LFM-A13, dasatinib, ONO-4059, CC-292, zanubrutinib, and ibrutinib (18). Ibrutinib is the most advanced in clinical development and has allowed much needed new treatment options for patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) and other hematologic malignancies (15, 18). Of note, the kinase function of BTK has recently been found to be also important for stability and activity of proteins involved in essential tumor suppressor pathways in epithelial cells, such as p53 (16, 19, 20), p73 (20, 21), and MDM2 (20, 22). This indicates that BTK is a pleiotropic kinase with a more complex activity than suspected previously, which performs very different functions depending on the context (23).

Recently, various investigations have demonstrated a positive correlation between BTK activity and severity of COVID-19 infection (24–29). In this context, administration of acalabrutinib to 19 hospitalized patients with severe COVID-19 infection resulted in improvement in oxygenation in a majority of them (n = 18), often within 1–3 days (24). In addition, a positive correlation between ibrutinib treatment and COVID-19 infection severity was demonstrated previously (25). Another study corroborated that ibrutinib is effective in decreasing the severity of COVID-19, with 6 of the 8 patients having recovered after treatment (26). Importantly, various clinical trials (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT04382586 and NCT04346199) are underway to fully evaluate the potential benefit of BTK inhibitors in COVID-19. In this minireview, we will discuss possible mechanisms by which BTK inhibitors could attenuate the symptoms of COVID-19 and provide a novel therapeutic option for the pandemic.

Factors That May Contribute to The Effects of BTK Inhibitors on Severe COVID-19

Despite the clear effects of BTK inhibitors on the prognosis of patients with COVID-19, as discussed above, there is limited mechanistic data reported so far that could explain these responses. Given the known functions of BTK, it is fair to assume that the main clinical impact of its inhibition could be related to a reduction of the activity of lymphocytes and thus, the exaggerated inflammation state brought upon by the virus, particularly in the lung. This is consistent with the fact that anti-inflammatories, such as dexamethasone, have been shown to improve the health and prognosis of patients with COVID-19 (30). However, we propose that BTK could be involved in the response to SARS-Cov-2 in other ways as well, which would further strengthen its relevance as a therapeutic target.

BTK inhibition blunts the hyperinflammatory response in lung

Virus-induced hyperinflammation is a major cause of disease severity and death in infected patients with COVID-19 (31–33). Indeed, it has been recently proposed that the actual cause of death by COVID-19 could be the organ inflammation and injury due to the immune response itself, instead of the direct effects of the virus on tissue (34). This hyperinflammation is characterized by increased serum levels of several inflammatory cytokines and chemokines, such as G-CSF, GM-CSF, macrophage inflammatory protein–1α, IL1β, IL6, IL7, IL8, IL9, IL10, IFNγ, IFNγ–inducible protein 10, and monocyte chemoattractant protein 1 (35–37), increased neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (38–40), and high macrophage activity (41).

Using mouse models, it has been observed that the pharmacologic blockade of BTK results in impaired immunity because of inhibition of macrophages (42). Importantly, BTK-driven macrophage inhibition is mediated by blocking the activation of both the inflammasome and NF-κB (42). Of note, both inflammasome and NF-κB pathways are known to play an essential role in cytokine storm in severe COVID-19 (43, 44). Therefore, patients with either solid or hematologic malignancies treated with BTK inhibitors could be at an advantage should they be infected by SARS-CoV-2 because their immune system would already be attenuated and this would prevent extreme responses to the virus.

Accumulating evidence has shown that BTK is implicated in the regulation of proinflammatory processes in lung, which promote irreversible tissue destruction (45–47). In this context, it has been shown that ibrutinib treatment of patients with chronic graft-versus-host disease inhibits the IL2 inducible T-cell kinase (ITK), which is involved in the selective activation of T cells that drive immune reactivity toward healthy tissues (48). Moreover, the administration of ibrutinib in mice with overwhelming lung inflammation resulted in reduction of alveolar macrophage activation, neutrophil influx, cytokine release, and plasma leakage into the lung (49). This supports the hypothesis of the potential anti-inflammatory activity of BTK inhibitors in lung tissue. Further studies have confirmed the role of BTK in monocyte/macrophage and neutrophil activity (50, 51), which contributes to the inflammatory response to infections. A study that examined lungs of patients with COVID-19 confirmed that the infiltrate of immune cells in alveoli was majorly macrophages and monocytes, while moderate multinucleated giant cells, minimal lymphocytes, eosinophils, and neutrophils were also observed (52). Moreover, macrophages express Toll-like receptors (TLR), which play an essential role in recognizing single-stranded RNA from viruses such as SARS-CoV-2 (53). BTK plays a key role in the activation of TLRs signaling through NF-κB, which triggers the expression of various inflammatory cytokines and chemokines (IL1β, IL6, TNFα, IL12, IL8, and CCL2) and phagocytosis (24, 54, 55). Consistent with this, it was demonstrated that treating patients with COVID-19 with acalabrutinib for 14 days resulted in the normalization of IL6 and a reduction of lymphopenia in most cases (24). This reduction is possibly associated with a decrease in inflammatory cytokines and chemokines (56). Of note, lymphopenia contributes to the severity of COVID-19 infection (57), and lethal victims of COVID-19 were reported to have a significantly lower lymphocyte count than survivors (39).

Another type of immune dysregulation related to COVID-19 severity is the polarization of macrophages to an M1 state (27) that produced proinflammatory-related factors, such as IL6, IL12, and TNF (58). BTK is crucial for M1 macrophage polarization, with BTK-deficient mice having markedly reduced recruitment of M1 macrophages (59). It has been demonstrated that BTK inhibition abrogates M1 polarization through suppression of CSF1 and IL10 in vivo (60).

Various investigations have suggested a positive correlation between COVID-19 severity and lymphopenia, a condition defined by abnormally low counts of lymphocytes (36, 57, 61). Currently, it is unclear how lymphopenia enhances SARS-CoV-2 infection. However, it has been suggested that lymphopenia promotes the cytokine storm (62). Importantly, it has been shown that treating patients with CLL with ibrutinib results in elevating the absolute lymphocyte count in the peripheral blood (63, 64).

It is worth to mention that some BTK inhibitors, including ibrutinib, bind covalently and noncovalently to other kinases and inhibit their activity, such as the SRC family kinases (65). Interestingly, some of the SRC family kinases have been implicated in replication of viruses (66). In this context, inhibition of SRC by saracatinib has been reported to block MERS-CoV at early stages of the viral life cycle (67). Thus, we hypothesize that BTK inhibitors may also inhibit SARS-CoV-2 replication through SRC inhibition.

Currently, there is no doubt that anti-inflammatory therapy plays a key role in the management of patients with COVID-19 through preventing further injury and organ damage or failure. So far, various drugs that possess an anti-inflammatory profile have been investigated in respect of their potential use as a therapeutic strategy for treating the consequences of a SAR-COV-2 infection, such as baricitinib (68), tocilizumab (69), and corticosteroids, including dexamethasone (70, 71). These drugs have been found to mitigate cytokine production and consequently abolish the cytokine storm induced by SARS-CoV-2. Baricitinib has been mainly used as a therapeutic strategy to interrupt the entry of SARS-CoV-2 into lung cells through blocking ACE2-mediated endocytosis, apart from its anti-inflammatory properties (72, 73). On the other hand, the effects of tocilizumab in patients with COVID-19 are mainly caused by its inhibition of the IL6 receptor and the cytokine storm (74). The molecular mechanisms underlying the effects of dexamethasone on COVID-19 severity are broad and can be partly explained by its anti-inflammatory properties, as well as being a cytokine suppressor (75).

We postulate that the mechanisms of action of BTK inhibitors as a therapeutic agent for COVID-19 are vastly different from other anti-inflammatory drugs. Importantly, they may prevent the cytokine storm through different pathways, such as inhibiting macrophages (42), inducing prolonged lymphocytosis (64), suppressing ITK (48), and blocking TLRs signaling activation (24), which requires signaling cascade for production of cytokines and chemokines. Therefore, BTK inhibitors, unlike other therapeutic strategies, have a wider range of effects on the immune response to SARS-CoV-2. Because of this, it could also be possible to identify the patients with COVID-19 that would more likely respond to therapies with BTK inhibitors by analyzing the degree of the inhibition of these pathways when exposed to these drugs.

Altogether, this shows that BTK could be important for the COVID-19–driven cytokine storm observed in the severe cases. Mechanistically, this could possibly be mediated by an elevation of its kinase activity, which ex vivo analysis showed increased BTK autophosphorylation in blood monocytes from patients with severe COVID-19 when compared with blood monocytes from healthy volunteers (24). Despite this evidence, the effect of BTK inhibitors on inflammation warrants further investigations.

BTK inhibition attenuates the COVID-19–associated respiratory distress syndrome

The overexpression of phosphorylated BTK in the lungs is associated with lung injury, and the induction of an acute respiratory distress syndrome has been reported previously (76–78). Accordingly, BTK has been proposed to be involved in sepsis-induced acute lung injury (ALI; ref, 76). Importantly, intratracheal injection of BTK siRNA confers potent protection against sepsis-induced ALI in a mouse model of cecal ligation and puncture-induced sepsis-induced ALI, as demonstrated by a dramatic reduction in epithelial cell apoptosis, pathologic scores, vascular permeability, pulmonary edema, and the expression of inflammatory cytokines and neutrophil infiltration in the lung tissues of septic mice (76). Moreover, inhibiting BTK with ibrutinib rescued mice from lethal influenza-driven ALI (77). The data showed that BTK inhibition reduced alveolar hemorrhage and caused dramatic morphologic alterations to the lungs, with interstitial thickening, and the presence of alveolar exudate (77).

The latest experimental evidence also shows that BTK is involved in trauma hemorrhagic shock-induced lung injury in rats, and blocking BTK activity with the LFM-A13 inhibitor protects lungs from this injury (78). In addition, at least one study has shown that BTK overexpression in lung is associated with collagen deposition around airways and total basal membrane thickness, suggesting a role for BTK in reducing airway stiffness and increasing airway resistance (45). The function of BTK in collagen deposition is mediated by matrix metalloproteinase-9 (45).

All these data together indicate a strong implication of BTK in different models of lung injury and show that its inhibition can ameliorate some of the symptoms involved. Therefore, we postulate that BTK inhibitors could also be decreasing the severity of COVID-19–related lung pathology by a direct effect on the general components of the exacerbated damage response to the infection. This possibility should be carefully explored.

BTK inhibitors may reduce thrombosis in patients with COVID-19

Many patients with COVID-19 are suffering with high risk of thrombotic complications, with 20% of severely ill patients affected by venous thromboembolism (79, 80). This has a critical impact on the prognosis of the disease. BTK inhibitors, specifically ibrutinib, are associated with reduced venous thrombosis and arterial thrombosis (81, 82), through mechanisms that are not fully understood. Thus, this may be an added advantage to using BTK inhibitors in COVID-19. Importantly, these drugs would lack the bleeding side effects of regular anticoagulants (29).

The Role of BTK in Cancer Patients with COVID-19

Patients with cancer have been described as one of the most susceptible groups in the COVID-19 pandemic, having shown so far a high mortality ratio (7–9). Specifically, patients with hematologic cancers (leukemia, myeloma, and lymphoma), lung cancer, or metastatic cancer (stage IV) had the uppermost frequency of severe events, described as a condition requiring admission to an intensive care unit, the use of mechanical ventilation, or death (83). However, the risk factors that lead to high susceptibility in patients with cancer are poorly explained. We will consider these patients separately in this review, in light of the important role of BTK in cancer.

Potential double action of BTK inhibitors in COVID-19 patients with blood malignancies

BTK inhibitors may be particularly helpful in patients with COVID-19 with blood malignancies (24–26, 84), given the oncogenic activity of BTK and the beneficial effects that the drugs already have on these cancers (85–87). The outcomes of administrating ibrutinib to 8 patients with COVID-19 with CLL have been already described previously (26). In this study, BTK inhibitor treatment had to be stopped in 6 of the patients (“BTKi-held”) and was allowed to continue in only 2 patients. Two of the total of 8 patients in this cohort developed severe respiratory failure and died of it, while the rest of patients showed mild-to-moderate symptoms. Importantly, the other 2 patients that were able to continue on ibrutinib instead had minimal oxygen requirements, with associated short hospital stays and, eventually a full recovery (26). Another study focused on ibrutinib given to patients with Waldenstrom macroglobulinemia with COVID-19 (25). It showed that 5 of 6 patients had mild symptoms and recovered promptly, while only 1 patient required hospitalization and mechanical ventilation, but eventually recovered fully. Although the numbers of cases in these studies were low, they nevertheless suggest that BTK inhibition may be particularly effective in patients with certain blood malignancies. Further studies will be needed to confirm this and fully understand the mechanisms involved.

The importance of BTK in cell death suggests unwanted side effects of the inhibitors in COVID-19

In solid cancers, BTK has not been shown to have the key oncogenic functions as seen in leukemias. On the contrary, BTK-dependent phosphorylation upregulates the stability and activity of p53 in epithelial cells (16), a critical tumor suppressor in humans (88). Several studies have confirmed that p53 is also involved in the host cell's nonspecific antiviral defense system (89). For example, viral infection results in induction of p53-mediated type I IFN signaling (90). Accordingly, knockout of p53 promotes replication of the SARS-CoV replicons (91), a novel coronavirus that broke out in 2003 and caused SARS at the beginning of the millennium, with a global lethality of approximately 10% (92). Given the similitudes between SARS-CoV and SARS-CoV-2, it should be investigated whether p53 has the same effect on the latter.

Viruses utilize different pathways to attenuate p53 activity and thus, avoid the induction of death in infected cells. For instance, coronavirus produces papain-like protease 2, which directly interacts and deubiquitinates cellular oncoprotein and p53 inhibitor, MDM2, and thus, promotes proteasomal degradation of p53 (93). This inhibits the p53-mediated production of type I IFN signaling and apoptosis and ensures viral growth (93). It is worth to mention that we previously identified BTK as an inhibitor of MDM2-mediated p53 degradation (22). Moreover, proteo-transcriptomics analysis of COVID-19–infected cells showed upregulation of various prosurvival pathways, including mTOR, hypoxia-inducible factor-1 alpha, and PI3K/protein kinase B (PI3K/AKT; ref. 94). p53 is known for suppressing all these pathways (94–98). Because of this, whether BTK inhibitors interfere with p53 activity in patients with COVID-19 should be analyzed. Given the fact that the exacerbated immune response seems more determinant in the cause of death than the viral load (34) and that the inhibitors would be given for short periods of time, the negative consequences would likely be negligible.

Summary and Final Conclusions

The urgent need of drugs to control the symptoms of COVID-19 has led to unexpected findings, including the potential importance of BTK inhibitors in increasing the survival of the most serious cases of the disease. This is consistent with the hypothesis that the major factor of poor prognosis is an excessive immune response, which BTK inhibition would reduce by the mechanisms we discussed. Despite many recent studies unanimously supporting the potential interest of BTK inhibitors as novel COVID-19 treatments, it would still be necessary to further study the mechanisms involved in the positive effects and carefully consider any negative side effects. One risk is an impaired humoral immunity, which may increase the susceptibility of the patients to secondary infections, such as pneumonia. Also, BTK inhibition in patients with COVID-19 with solid cancers might cause adverse effects due to suppression of p53 activity, perhaps accelerating tumor growth, favoring metastasis, or even interfering with antineoplastic treatments.

The limited studies published so far have raised the exciting possibility that BTK inhibition may reduce the mortality due to COVID-19. While these findings may have an important clinical impact, at the moment they cannot be considered conclusive, because of the small cohorts analyzed. To clarify the relationship between BTK inhibitors and COVID-19, larger-scale datasets are necessary, as well as more detailed mechanistic studies.

Authors' Disclosures

No disclosures were reported.

Acknowledgments

This work was funded by the M.C. Andreu Memorial Fund. The authors would like to thank all the doctors and nurses who bravely fought the virus during the COVID-19 epidemic.

Footnotes

  • Mol Cancer Res 2021;19:549–54

  • Received September 15, 2020.
  • Revision received November 4, 2020.
  • Accepted December 10, 2020.
  • Published first December 16, 2020.
  • ©2020 American Association for Cancer Research.

References

  1. 1.↵
    Wuhan Municipal Health Commission. Report of clustering pneumonia of unknown etiology in Wuhan city. Available form: http://wjw.wuhan.gov.cn/front/web/showDetail/2019123108989.
  2. 2.↵
    1. Lu R,
    2. Zhao X,
    3. Li J,
    4. Niu P,
    5. Yang B,
    6. Wu H,
    7. et al.
    Genomic characterisation and epidemiology of 2019 novel coronavirus: implications for virus origins and receptor binding. Lancet 2020;10224:565–74.
    OpenUrl
  3. 3.↵
    1. Zhou P,
    2. Yang XL,
    3. Wang XG,
    4. Hu B,
    5. Zhang L,
    6. Zhang W,
    7. et al.
    A pneumonia outbreak associated with a new coronavirus of probable bat origin. Nature 2020;579:270–3.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  4. 4.↵
    1. Zhu N,
    2. Zhang D,
    3. Wang W,
    4. Li X,
    5. Yang B,
    6. Song J,
    7. et al.
    A novel coronavirus from patients with pneumonia in China, 2019. N Engl J Med 2020;382:727–33.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  5. 5.↵
    1. He F,
    2. Deng Y,
    3. Li W
    . Coronavirus disease 2019: what we know? J Med Virol 2020;92:719–25.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  6. 6.↵
    1. Liu Y,
    2. Gayle AA,
    3. Wilder-Smith A,
    4. Rocklöv J
    . The reproductive number of COVID-19 is higher compared to SARS coronavirus. J Travel Med 2020;27:1–4.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  7. 7.↵
    1. Afshar ZM,
    2. Dayani M,
    3. Naderi M,
    4. Ghanbarveisi F,
    5. Shiri S,
    6. Rajatif F
    . Fatality rate of COVID-19 in patients with malignancies: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Infect 2020;12:1–3.
    OpenUrl
  8. 8.↵
    1. Mehta V,
    2. Goel S,
    3. Kabarriti R,
    4. Cole D,
    5. Goldfinger M,
    6. Acuna-Villaorduna A,
    7. et al.
    Case fatality rate of cancer patients with COVID-19 in a New York hospital system. Cancer Discov 2020;10:935–41.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  9. 9.↵
    1. Miyashita H,
    2. Mikami T,
    3. Chopra N,
    4. Yamada T,
    5. Chernyavsky S,
    6. Rizk D,
    7. et al.
    Do patients with cancer have a poorer prognosis of COVID-19? An experience in New York City. Ann Oncol 2020;31:1088–9.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  10. 10.↵
    1. Pinato DJ,
    2. Zambelli A,
    3. Aguilar-Company J,
    4. Bower M,
    5. Sng CCT,
    6. Salazar R,
    7. et al.
    Clinical portrait of the SARS-CoV-2 epidemic in European patients with cancer. Cancer Discov 2020;10:1465–74.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  11. 11.↵
    1. Campbell R,
    2. Chong G,
    3. Hawkes E
    . Novel indications for Bruton's tyrosine kinase inhibitors, beyond hematological malignancies. J Clin Med 2018;7:62–75.
    OpenUrl
  12. 12.↵
    1. Yang EJ,
    2. Yoon JH,
    3. Chung KC
    . Bruton's tyrosine kinase phosphorylates cAMP-responsive element-binding protein at serine 133 during neuronal differentiation in immortalized hippocampal progenitor cells. J Biol Chem 2004;279:1827–37.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  13. 13.↵
    1. Vetrie D,
    2. Vořechovský I,
    3. Sideras P,
    4. Holland J,
    5. Davies A,
    6. Flinter F,
    7. et al.
    The gene involved in X-linked agammaglobulinaemia is a member of the SRC family of protein-tyrosine kinases. Nature 1993;361:226–33.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  14. 14.↵
    1. Maas A,
    2. Hendriks RW
    . Role of Bruton's tyrosine kinase in B cell development. Dev Immunol 2001;8:171–81.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  15. 15.↵
    1. Wang Y,
    2. Zhang LL,
    3. Champlin RE,
    4. Wang ML
    . Targeting Bruton's tyrosine kinase with ibrutinib in B-cell malignancies. Clin Pharmacol Ther 2015;97:455–68.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  16. 16.↵
    1. Althubiti M,
    2. Rada M,
    3. Samuel J,
    4. Escorsa JM,
    5. Najeeb H,
    6. Lee K-G,
    7. et al.
    BTK modulates p53 activity to enhance apoptotic and senescent responses. Cancer Res 2016;76:5405–14.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  17. 17.↵
    1. Khan Y,
    2. O'Brien S
    . Acalabrutinib and its use in treatment of chronic lymphocytic leukemia. Futur Oncol 2019;15:579–89.
    OpenUrl
  18. 18.↵
    1. Aalipour A,
    2. Advani RH
    . Bruton's tyrosine kinase inhibitors and their clinical potential in the treatment of B-cell malignancies: focus on ibrutinib. Ther Adv Hematol 2014;5:121–33.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  19. 19.↵
    1. Ekpenyong-Akiba AE,
    2. Poblocka M,
    3. Mohammad P,
    4. Rada M,
    5. Jurk D,
    6. Germano S,
    7. et al.
    Amelioration of age-related brain function decline by Bruton's tyrosine kinase inhibition. Aging 2020;19:1–11.
    OpenUrl
  20. 20.↵
    1. Rada M,
    2. Barlev N,
    3. Macip S
    . BTK: a two-faced effector in cancer and tumour suppression. Cell Death Dis 2018;9:10–12.
    OpenUrl
  21. 21.↵
    1. Rada M,
    2. Barlev N,
    3. Macip S
    . BTK modulates p73 activity to induce apoptosis independently of p53. Cell Death Discov 2018;4:1–6.
    OpenUrl
  22. 22.↵
    1. Rada M,
    2. Althubiti M,
    3. Ekpenyong-Akiba AE,
    4. Lee K-G,
    5. Lam KP,
    6. Fedorova O,
    7. et al.
    BTK blocks the inhibitory effects of MDM2 on p53 activity. Oncotarget 2017;8:106639–47.
    OpenUrl
  23. 23.↵
    1. Rada M,
    2. Barlev N,
    3. Macip S
    . BTK: a two-faced effector in cancer and tumour suppression. Cell Death Dis 2018;9:1064.
    OpenUrl
  24. 24.↵
    1. Roschewski M,
    2. Lionakis MS,
    3. Sharman JP,
    4. Roswarski J,
    5. Goy A,
    6. Monticelli MA,
    7. et al.
    Inhibition of Bruton tyrosine kinase in patients with severe COVID-19. Sci Immunol 2020;5:1–13.
    OpenUrl
  25. 25.↵
    1. Treon SP,
    2. Castillo JJ,
    3. Skarbnik AP,
    4. Soumerai J,
    5. Ghobrial IM,
    6. Guerrera ML,
    7. et al.
    The BTK-inhibitor ibrutinib may protect against pulmonary injury in COVID-19 infected patients. Blood 2020;135:1912–5.
    OpenUrl
  26. 26.↵
    1. Thibaud S,
    2. Tremblay D,
    3. Bhalla S,
    4. Zimmerman B,
    5. Sigel K,
    6. Gabrilove J
    . Protective role of BTK inhibitors in patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia and COVID-19. Br J Haematol 2020;190:e73–6.
    OpenUrl
  27. 27.↵
    1. Chong EA,
    2. Roeker LE,
    3. Shadman M,
    4. Davids MS,
    5. Schuster SJ,
    6. Mato AR
    . BTK inhibitors in cancer patients with COVID19: “the winner will be the one who controls that chaos” (Napoleon Bonaparte). Clin Cancer Res 2020;26:3514–16.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  28. 28.↵
    1. Fürstenau M,
    2. Langerbeins P,
    3. De Silva N,
    4. Fink AM,
    5. Robrecht S,
    6. von Tresckow J,
    7. et al.
    COVID-19 among fit patients with CLL treated with venetoclax-based combinations. Leukemia 2020;34:2225–9.
    OpenUrl
  29. 29.↵
    1. Nicolson PL,
    2. Welsh JD,
    3. Chauhan A,
    4. Thomas MR,
    5. Kahn ML,
    6. Watson SP
    . A rationale for blocking thromboinflammation in COVID-19 with BTK inhibitors. Platelets 2020;31:1–6.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  30. 30.↵
    1. Horby P,
    2. Lim WS,
    3. Emberson J,
    4. Mafham M,
    5. Bell J,
    6. Linsell L,
    7. et al.
    Dexamethasone in hospitalized patients with COVID-19: preliminary report. N Engl J Med 2020 Jul 17 [Epub ahead of print].
  31. 31.↵
    1. Didangelosa A
    . COVID-19 hyperinflammation: what about neutrophils? Mol Biol Physiol 2020;5:1–5.
    OpenUrl
  32. 32.↵
    1. Haigh K,
    2. Syrimi ZJ,
    3. Irvine S,
    4. Blanchard TJ,
    5. Pervaiz MS,
    6. Toth AG,
    7. et al.
    Hyperinflammation with COVID-19: the key to patient deterioration? Clin Infect Pract 2020;7:100033.
    OpenUrl
  33. 33.↵
    1. Qin C,
    2. Zhou L,
    3. Hu Z,
    4. Zhang S,
    5. Yang S,
    6. Tao Y,
    7. et al.
    Dysregulation of immune response in patients with COVID-19 in Wuhan, China. Clin Infect Dis 2020;71:762–8.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  34. 34.↵
    1. Dorward DD,
    2. Russell CD,
    3. Um IH,
    4. Elshani M,
    5. Armstrong SD,
    6. Penrice-Randal R,
    7. et al.
    Tissue-specific immunopathology in fatal Covid-19. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2021;203:192–201.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  35. 35.↵
    1. Huang C,
    2. Wang Y,
    3. Li X,
    4. Ren L,
    5. Zhao J,
    6. Hu Y,
    7. et al.
    Clinical features of patients infected with 2019 novel coronavirus in Wuhan, China. Lancet 2020;395:497–506.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  36. 36.↵
    1. Chen G,
    2. Wu D,
    3. Guo W,
    4. Cao Y,
    5. Huang D,
    6. Wang H,
    7. et al.
    Clinical and immunological features of severe and moderate coronavirus disease 2019. J Clin Invest 2020;130:2620–9.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  37. 37.↵
    1. Gong J,
    2. Dong H,
    3. Xia SQ,
    4. Huang YZ,
    5. Wang D,
    6. Zhao Y,
    7. et al.
    Correlation analysis between disease severity and inflammation-related parameters in patients with COVID-19 pneumonia. BMC Infect Dis 2020;20:963.
    OpenUrl
  38. 38.↵
    1. Zhou F,
    2. Yu T,
    3. Du R,
    4. Fan G,
    5. Liu Y,
    6. Liu Z,
    7. et al.
    Clinical course and risk factors for mortality of adult inpatients with COVID-19 in Wuhan, China: a retrospective cohort study. Lancet 2020;395:1054–62.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  39. 39.↵
    1. Ruan Q,
    2. Yang K,
    3. Wang W,
    4. Jiang L,
    5. Song J
    . Clinical predictors of mortality due to COVID-19 based on an analysis of data of 150 patients from Wuhan, China. Intensive Care Med 2020;46:846–8.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  40. 40.↵
    1. Wu C,
    2. Chen X,
    3. Cai Y,
    4. Xia J,
    5. Zhou X,
    6. Xu S,
    7. et al.
    Risk factors associated with acute respiratory distress syndrome and death in patients with coronavirus disease 2019 pneumonia in Wuhan, China. JAMA Intern Med 2020;180:934–43.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  41. 41.↵
    1. Merad M,
    2. Martin JC
    . Pathological inflammation in patients with COVID-19: a key role for monocytes and macrophages. Nat Rev Immunol 2020;20:355–62.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  42. 42.↵
    1. Buszko M,
    2. Park JH,
    3. Verthelyi D,
    4. Sen R,
    5. Young HA,
    6. Rosenberg AS
    . The dynamic changes in cytokine responses in COVID-19: a snapshot of the current state of knowledge. Nat Immunol 2020;21:1146–51.
    OpenUrl
  43. 43.↵
    1. Freeman TL,
    2. Swartz TH
    . Targeting the NLRP3 inflammasome in severe COVID-19. Front Immunol 2020;11:1–12.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  44. 44.↵
    1. Zizzo G,
    2. Cohen PL
    . Imperfect storm: is interleukin-33 the Achilles heel of COVID-19? Lancet Rheumatol 2020;9913:1–12.
    OpenUrl
  45. 45.↵
    1. Florence JM,
    2. Krupa A,
    3. Booshehri LM,
    4. Gajewski AL,
    5. Kurdowska AK
    . Disrupting the BTK pathway suppresses COPD-like lung alterations in atherosclerosis prone apoE-/- mice following regular exposure to cigarette smoke. Int J Mol Sci 2018;19:343–57.
    OpenUrl
  46. 46.↵
    1. Krupa A,
    2. Fol M,
    3. Rahman M,
    4. Stokes KY,
    5. Florence JM,
    6. Leskov IL,
    7. et al.
    Silencing Bruton's tyrosine kinase in alveolar neutrophils protects mice from LPS/immune complex-induced acute lung injury. Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol 2014;307:L435–48.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  47. 47.↵
    1. Fan Z,
    2. Wang Y,
    3. Xu X,
    4. Wu Y
    . Inhibitor of Bruton's tyrosine kinases, PCI-32765, decreases pro-inflammatory mediators' production in high glucose-induced macrophages. Int Immunopharmacol 2018;58:145–53.
    OpenUrl
  48. 48.↵
    1. Miklos D,
    2. Cutler CS,
    3. Arora M,
    4. Waller EK,
    5. Jagasia M,
    6. Pusic I,
    7. et al.
    Ibrutinib for chronic graft-versus-host disease after failure of prior therapy. Blood 2017;130:2243–50.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  49. 49.↵
    1. de Porto AP,
    2. Liu Z,
    3. de Beer R,
    4. Florquin S,
    5. de Boer OJ,
    6. Hendriks RW,
    7. et al.
    BTK inhibitor ibrutinib reduces inflammatory myeloid cell responses in the lung during murine pneumococcal pneumonia. Mol Med 2019;25:3–12.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  50. 50.↵
    1. Lionakis MS,
    2. Dunleavy K,
    3. Roschewski M,
    4. Widemann BC,
    5. Butman JA,
    6. Schmitz R,
    7. et al.
    Inhibition of B cell receptor signaling by ibrutinib in primary CNS lymphoma. Cancer Cell 2017;31:833–43.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  51. 51.↵
    1. Ye B,
    2. Zhou C,
    3. Guo H,
    4. Zheng M
    . Effects of BTK signalling in pathogenic microorganism infections. J Cell Mol Med 2019;23:6522–9.
    OpenUrl
  52. 52.↵
    1. Xiaohong Y,
    2. Tingyuan L,
    3. Zhicheng H,
    4. Yifang P,
    5. Huawen L,
    6. Shicang Y,
    7. et al.
    A pathological report of three COVID-19 cases by minimally invasive autopsies. Chin J Pathol 2020;49:411–7.
    OpenUrl
  53. 53.↵
    1. de Groot NG,
    2. Bontrop RE
    . COVID-19 pandemic: is a gender-defined dosage effect responsible for the high mortality rate among males? Immunogenetics 2020;72:275–7.
    OpenUrl
  54. 54.↵
    1. Page TH,
    2. Urbaniak AM,
    3. Espirito Santo AI,
    4. Danks L,
    5. Smallie T,
    6. Williams LM,
    7. et al.
    Bruton's tyrosine kinase regulates TLR7/8-induced TNF transcription via nuclear factor-κB recruitment. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 2018;499:260–6.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  55. 55.↵
    1. Byrne JC,
    2. Ní Gabhann J,
    3. Stacey KB,
    4. Coffey BM,
    5. McCarthy E,
    6. Thomas W,
    7. et al.
    Bruton's tyrosine kinase is required for apoptotic cell uptake via regulating the phosphorylation and localization of calreticulin. J Immunol 2013;190:5207–15.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  56. 56.↵
    1. Kamphuis E,
    2. Junt T,
    3. Waibler Z,
    4. Forster R,
    5. Kalinke U
    . Type I interferons directly regulate lymphocyte recirculation and cause transient blood lymphopenia. Blood 2006;108:3253–61.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  57. 57.↵
    1. Huang I,
    2. Pranata R
    . Lymphopenia in severe coronavirus disease-2019 (COVID-19): systematic review and meta-analysis. J Intensive Care 2020;8:1–10.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  58. 58.↵
    1. Yunna C,
    2. Mengru H,
    3. Lei W,
    4. Weidong C
    . Macrophage M1/M2 polarization. Eur J Pharmacol 2020;877:1–9.
    OpenUrl
  59. 59.↵
    1. Gabhann JN,
    2. Hams E,
    3. Smith S,
    4. Wynne C,
    5. Byrne JC,
    6. Brennan K,
    7. et al.
    BTK regulates macrophage polarization in response to lipopolysaccharide. PLoS One 2014;9:1–11.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  60. 60.↵
    1. Papin A,
    2. Tessoulin B,
    3. Bellanger C,
    4. Moreau A,
    5. Le Bris Y,
    6. Maisonneuve H,
    7. et al.
    CSF1R and BTK inhibitions as novel strategies to disrupt the dialog between mantle cell lymphoma and macrophages. Leukemia 2019;33:2442–53.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  61. 61.↵
    1. Tavakolpour S,
    2. Rakhshandehroo T,
    3. Wei EX,
    4. Rashidian M
    . Lymphopenia during the COVID-19 infection: what it shows and what can be learned. Immunol Lett 2020;225:31–2.
    OpenUrl
  62. 62.↵
    1. Kuppalli K,
    2. Rasmussen AL
    . A glimpse into the eye of the COVID-19 cytokine storm. EBioMedicine 2020;55:4–5.
    OpenUrl
  63. 63.↵
    1. Rossi D,
    2. Gaidano G
    . Lymphocytosis and ibrutinib treatment of CLL. Blood 2014;123:1772–4.
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  64. 64.↵
    1. Woyach JA,
    2. Smucker K,
    3. Smith LL,
    4. Lozanski A,
    5. Zhong Y,
    6. Ruppert AS,
    7. et al.
    Prolonged lymphocytosis during ibrutinib therapy is associated with distinct molecular characteristics and does not indicate a suboptimal response to therapy. Blood 2014;123:1810–7.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  65. 65.↵
    1. Patel V,
    2. Balakrishnan K,
    3. Bibikova E,
    4. Ayres M,
    5. Keating MJ,
    6. Wierda WG,
    7. et al.
    Comparison of acalabrutinib, a selective Bruton tyrosine kinase inhibitor, with ibrutinib in chronic lymphocytic leukemia cells. Clin Cancer Res 2017;23:3734–43.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  66. 66.↵
    1. Weisberg E,
    2. Parent A,
    3. Yang PL,
    4. Sattler M,
    5. Liu Q,
    6. Liu Q,
    7. et al.
    Repurposing of kinase inhibitors for treatment of COVID-19. Pharm Res 2020;37:1–29.
    OpenUrl
  67. 67.↵
    1. Shin JS,
    2. Jung E,
    3. Kim M,
    4. Baric RS,
    5. Go YY
    . Saracatinib inhibits middle east respiratory syndrome-coronavirus replication in vitro. Viruses 2018;10:1–19.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  68. 68.↵
    1. Zhang X,
    2. Zhang Y,
    3. Qiao W,
    4. Zhang J,
    5. Qi Z
    . Baricitinib, a drug with potential effect to prevent SARS-COV-2 from entering target cells and control cytokine storm induced by COVID-19. Int Immunopharmacol 2020;86:1–5.
    OpenUrl
  69. 69.↵
    1. Levi M
    . Tocilizumab for severe COVID-19: a promising intervention affecting inflammation and coagulation. Eur J Intern Med 2020;76:21–2.
    OpenUrl
  70. 70.↵
    1. Russell CD,
    2. Millar JE,
    3. Baillie JK
    . Clinical evidence does not support corticosteroid treatment for 2019-nCoV lung injury. Lancet 2020;395:473–5.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  71. 71.↵
    1. Villar J,
    2. Ferrando C,
    3. Martínez D,
    4. Ambrós A,
    5. Muñoz T,
    6. Soler JA,
    7. et al.
    Dexamethasone treatment for the acute respiratory distress syndrome: a multicentre, randomised controlled trial. Lancet Respir Med 2020;8:267–76.
    OpenUrl
  72. 72.↵
    1. Zhong J,
    2. Tang J,
    3. Ye C,
    4. Dong L
    . The immunology of COVID-19: is immune modulation an option for treatment? Lancet Rheumatol 2020;2:e428–36.
    OpenUrl
  73. 73.↵
    1. Richardson P,
    2. Griffin I,
    3. Tucker C,
    4. Smith D,
    5. Oechsle O,
    6. Phelan A,
    7. et al.
    Baricitinib as potential treatment for 2019-nCoV acute respiratory disease. Lancet 2020;395:e30–1.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  74. 74.↵
    1. Alattar R,
    2. Ibrahim TBH,
    3. Shaar SH,
    4. Abdalla S,
    5. Shukri K,
    6. Daghfal JN,
    7. et al.
    Tocilizumab for the treatment of severe coronavirus disease 2019. J Med Virol 2020;92:2042–9.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  75. 75.↵
    1. Lammers T,
    2. Sofias AM,
    3. Meel RVD,
    4. Schiffelers R,
    5. Storm G,
    6. Tacke F,
    7. et al.
    Dexamethasone nanomedicines for COVID-19. Nat Nanotechnol 2020;15:618–21.
    OpenUrl
  76. 76.↵
    1. Zhou P,
    2. Ma B,
    3. Xu S,
    4. Zhang S,
    5. Tang H,
    6. Zhu S,
    7. et al.
    Knockdown of Burton's tyrosine kinase confers potent protection against sepsis-induced acute lung injury. Cell Biochem Biophys 2014;70:1265–75.
    OpenUrl
  77. 77.↵
    1. Florence JM,
    2. Krupa A,
    3. Booshehri LM,
    4. Davis SA,
    5. Matthay MA,
    6. Kurdowska AK
    . Inhibiting Bruton's tyrosine kinase rescues mice from lethal influenza-induced acute lung injury. Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol 2018;315:L52–8.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  78. 78.↵
    1. Liu X,
    2. Zhang J,
    3. Han W,
    4. Wang Y,
    5. Liu Y,
    6. Zhang Y,
    7. et al.
    Inhibition of BTK protects lungs from trauma-hemorrhagic shock-induced injury in rats. Mol Med Rep 2017;16:192–200.
    OpenUrl
  79. 79.↵
    1. Al-Ani F,
    2. Chehade S,
    3. Lazo-Langner A
    . Thrombosis risk associated with COVID-19 infection. A scoping review. Thromb Res 2020;192:152–60.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  80. 80.↵
    1. Xu J,
    2. Wang L,
    3. Zhao L,
    4. Li F,
    5. Liu J,
    6. Zhang L,
    7. et al.
    Risk assessment of venous thromboembolism and bleeding in COVID-19 patients. Res Sq 2020:1–18.
  81. 81.↵
    1. Aguilar C
    . Ibrutinib-related bleeding: pathogenesis, clinical implications and management. Blood Coagul Fibrinolysis 2018;29:481–7.
    OpenUrl
  82. 82.↵
    1. Kander EM,
    2. Zhao Q,
    3. Bhat SA,
    4. Hirsch J,
    5. Byrd JC,
    6. Ooka L,
    7. et al.
    Venous and arterial thrombosis in patients with haematological malignancy during treatment with ibrutinib. Br J Haematol 2019;187:399–402.
    OpenUrl
  83. 83.↵
    1. Dai M,
    2. Liu D,
    3. Liu M,
    4. Zhou F,
    5. Li G,
    6. Chen Z,
    7. et al.
    Patients with cancer appear more vulnerable to SARS-COV-2: a multi-center study during the COVID-19 outbreak. Cancer Discov 2020;10:783–91.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  84. 84.↵
    1. Scarfò L,
    2. Chatzikonstantinou T,
    3. Rigolin GM,
    4. Quaresmini G,
    5. Motta M,
    6. Vitale C,
    7. et al.
    COVID-19 severity and mortality in patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia: a joint study by ERIC, the European Research Initiative on CLL, and CLL Campus. Leukemia 2020;34:2354–63.
    OpenUrl
  85. 85.↵
    1. Kim E,
    2. Hurtz C,
    3. Koehrer S,
    4. Wang Z,
    5. Balasubramanian S,
    6. Chang BY,
    7. et al.
    Ibrutinib inhibits pre-BCR+ B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia progression by targeting BTK and BLK. Blood 2017;129:1155–65.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  86. 86.↵
    1. Dobrovolsky D,
    2. Wang ES,
    3. Morrow S,
    4. Leahy C,
    5. Faust T,
    6. Nowak RP,
    7. et al.
    Bruton's tyrosine kinase degradation as a therapeutic strategy for cancer. Blood 2019;133:952–61.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  87. 87.↵
    1. Byrd J,
    2. Burger J,
    3. Wiestner A
    . Clinical roundtable monograph: the importance of the BTK pathway in B-cell malignancies. Clin Adv Hematol Oncol 2013;11:1–15.
    OpenUrl
  88. 88.↵
    1. Rada M,
    2. Vasileva E,
    3. Lezina L,
    4. Marouco D,
    5. Antonov AV,
    6. Macip S,
    7. et al.
    Human EHMT2/G9a activates p53 through methylation-independent mechanism. Oncogene 2017;36:922–32.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  89. 89.↵
    1. Ramaiah MJ
    . Gene reports mTOR inhibition and p53 activation, microRNAs: the possible therapy against pandemic COVID-19. Gene Rep 2020;20:1–6.
    OpenUrl
  90. 90.↵
    1. Muñoz-Fontela C,
    2. Macip S,
    3. Martínez-Sobrido L,
    4. Brown L,
    5. Ashour J,
    6. García-Sastre A,
    7. et al.
    Transcriptional role of p53 in interferon-mediated antiviral immunity. J Exp Med 2008;205:1929–38.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  91. 91.↵
    1. Ma-Lauer Y,
    2. Carbajo-Lozoya J,
    3. Hein MY,
    4. Müller MA,
    5. Deng W,
    6. Lei J,
    7. et al.
    P53 down-regulates SARS coronavirus replication and is targeted by the SARS-unique domain and PLpro via E3 ubiquitin ligase RCHY1. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2016;113:E5192–201.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  92. 92.↵
    1. Cheng VCC,
    2. Lau SKP,
    3. Woo PCY,
    4. Kwok YY
    . Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus as an agent of emerging and reemerging infection. Clin Microbiol Rev 2007;20:660–94.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  93. 93.↵
    1. Yuan L,
    2. Chen Z,
    3. Song S,
    4. Wang S,
    5. Tian C,
    6. Xing G,
    7. et al.
    P53 degradation by a coronavirus papain-like protease suppresses type I interferon signaling. J Biol Chem 2015;290:3172–82.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  94. 94.↵
    1. Appelberg S,
    2. Gupta S,
    3. Ambikan AT,
    4. Mikaeloff F,
    5. Végvári A,
    6. Akusjärvi SS,
    7. et al.
    Dysregulation in mTOR/HIF-1 signaling identified by proteo-transcriptomics of SARS-CoV-2 infected cells. Emerg Microbes Infect 2020;9:1748–60.
    OpenUrl
  95. 95.↵
    1. Hasty P,
    2. Sharp ZD,
    3. Curiel TJ,
    4. Campisi J
    . mTORC1 and p53. Cell Cycle 2013;12:20–5.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  96. 96.↵
    1. Sermeus A,
    2. Michiels C
    . Reciprocal influence of the p53 and the hypoxic pathways. Cell Death Dis 2011;2:1–11.
    OpenUrl
  97. 97.↵
    1. Singh B,
    2. Reddy PG,
    3. Goberdhan A,
    4. Walsh C,
    5. Dao S,
    6. Ngai I,
    7. et al.
    p53 regulates cell survival by inhibiting PIK3CA in squamous cell carcinomas. Genes Dev 2002;16:984–93.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  98. 98.↵
    1. Ravi R,
    2. Mookerjee B,
    3. Bhujwalla ZM,
    4. Sutter CH,
    5. Artemov D,
    6. Zeng Q,
    7. et al.
    Regulation of tumor angiogenesis by p53-induced degradation of hypoxia- inducible factor 1α. Genes Dev 2000;14:34–44.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
PreviousNext
Back to top
Molecular Cancer Research: 19 (4)
April 2021
Volume 19, Issue 4
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • About the Cover
  • Editorial Board (PDF)

Sign up for alerts

View this article with LENS

Open full page PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for sharing this Molecular Cancer Research article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Relevance of the Bruton Tyrosine Kinase as a Target for COVID-19 Therapy
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from Molecular Cancer Research
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in Molecular Cancer Research.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Relevance of the Bruton Tyrosine Kinase as a Target for COVID-19 Therapy
Miran Rada, Zahraa Qusairy, Marta Massip-Salcedo and Salvador Macip
Mol Cancer Res April 1 2021 (19) (4) 549-554; DOI: 10.1158/1541-7786.MCR-20-0814

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Relevance of the Bruton Tyrosine Kinase as a Target for COVID-19 Therapy
Miran Rada, Zahraa Qusairy, Marta Massip-Salcedo and Salvador Macip
Mol Cancer Res April 1 2021 (19) (4) 549-554; DOI: 10.1158/1541-7786.MCR-20-0814
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Introduction
    • Factors That May Contribute to The Effects of BTK Inhibitors on Severe COVID-19
    • The Role of BTK in Cancer Patients with COVID-19
    • Summary and Final Conclusions
    • Authors' Disclosures
    • Acknowledgments
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Advertisement

Related Articles

Cited By...

More in this TOC Section

  • O-GlcNAc Transferase—Oncogene or Not?
  • MEK/ERK Network as a Therapeutic Target
Show more Reviews
  • Home
  • Alerts
  • Feedback
  • Privacy Policy
Facebook  Twitter  LinkedIn  YouTube  RSS

Articles

  • Online First
  • Current Issue
  • Past Issues
  • Rapid Impact Archive
  • Meeting Abstracts

Information for

  • Authors
  • Subscribers
  • Advertisers
  • Librarians

About MCR

  • About the Journal
  • Editorial Board
  • Permissions
  • Submit a Manuscript
AACR logo

Copyright © 2021 by the American Association for Cancer Research.

Molecular Cancer Research
eISSN: 1557-3125
ISSN: 1541-7786

Advertisement