Skip to main content
  • AACR Publications
    • Blood Cancer Discovery
    • Cancer Discovery
    • Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention
    • Cancer Immunology Research
    • Cancer Prevention Research
    • Cancer Research
    • Clinical Cancer Research
    • Molecular Cancer Research
    • Molecular Cancer Therapeutics

AACR logo

  • Register
  • Log in
  • Log out
  • My Cart
Advertisement

Main menu

  • Home
  • About
    • The Journal
    • AACR Journals
    • Subscriptions
    • Permissions and Reprints
  • Articles
    • OnlineFirst
    • Current Issue
    • Past Issues
    • Rapid Impact Archive
    • Meeting Abstracts
    • Collections
      • COVID-19 & Cancer Resource Center
      • Metabolism Collection
      • Editors' Picks
      • "Best of" Collection
  • For Authors
    • Information for Authors
    • Author Services
    • Best of: Author Profiles
    • Spotlight on Genomic Analysis of Rare and Understudied Cancers
    • Submit
  • Alerts
    • Table of Contents
    • Editors' Picks
    • OnlineFirst
    • Citation
    • Author/Keyword
    • RSS Feeds
    • My Alert Summary & Preferences
  • News
    • Cancer Discovery News
  • COVID-19
  • Webinars
  • Search More

    Advanced Search

  • AACR Publications
    • Blood Cancer Discovery
    • Cancer Discovery
    • Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention
    • Cancer Immunology Research
    • Cancer Prevention Research
    • Cancer Research
    • Clinical Cancer Research
    • Molecular Cancer Research
    • Molecular Cancer Therapeutics

User menu

  • Register
  • Log in
  • Log out
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Molecular Cancer Research
Molecular Cancer Research
  • Home
  • About
    • The Journal
    • AACR Journals
    • Subscriptions
    • Permissions and Reprints
  • Articles
    • OnlineFirst
    • Current Issue
    • Past Issues
    • Rapid Impact Archive
    • Meeting Abstracts
    • Collections
      • COVID-19 & Cancer Resource Center
      • Metabolism Collection
      • Editors' Picks
      • "Best of" Collection
  • For Authors
    • Information for Authors
    • Author Services
    • Best of: Author Profiles
    • Spotlight on Genomic Analysis of Rare and Understudied Cancers
    • Submit
  • Alerts
    • Table of Contents
    • Editors' Picks
    • OnlineFirst
    • Citation
    • Author/Keyword
    • RSS Feeds
    • My Alert Summary & Preferences
  • News
    • Cancer Discovery News
  • COVID-19
  • Webinars
  • Search More

    Advanced Search

Cell Cycle, Cell Death, and Senescence

Protein Kinase Casein Kinase 2–Mediated Upregulation of N-Cadherin Confers Anoikis Resistance on Esophageal Carcinoma Cells

Hyeonseok Ko, Seongrak Kim, Cheng-Hao Jin, Eunjung Lee, Sunyoung Ham, Jong In Yook and Kunhong Kim
Hyeonseok Ko
Authors' Affiliations: 1Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Yonsei University College of Medicine; 2Brain Korea 21 Project for Medical Science of Yonsei University; 3Department of Oral Pathology; 4Oral Cancer Research Institute, Yonsei University College of Dentistry, 50 Yonsei-ro, Seodaemun-gu, Seoul, Korea
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Seongrak Kim
Authors' Affiliations: 1Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Yonsei University College of Medicine; 2Brain Korea 21 Project for Medical Science of Yonsei University; 3Department of Oral Pathology; 4Oral Cancer Research Institute, Yonsei University College of Dentistry, 50 Yonsei-ro, Seodaemun-gu, Seoul, Korea
Authors' Affiliations: 1Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Yonsei University College of Medicine; 2Brain Korea 21 Project for Medical Science of Yonsei University; 3Department of Oral Pathology; 4Oral Cancer Research Institute, Yonsei University College of Dentistry, 50 Yonsei-ro, Seodaemun-gu, Seoul, Korea
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Cheng-Hao Jin
Authors' Affiliations: 1Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Yonsei University College of Medicine; 2Brain Korea 21 Project for Medical Science of Yonsei University; 3Department of Oral Pathology; 4Oral Cancer Research Institute, Yonsei University College of Dentistry, 50 Yonsei-ro, Seodaemun-gu, Seoul, Korea
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Eunjung Lee
Authors' Affiliations: 1Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Yonsei University College of Medicine; 2Brain Korea 21 Project for Medical Science of Yonsei University; 3Department of Oral Pathology; 4Oral Cancer Research Institute, Yonsei University College of Dentistry, 50 Yonsei-ro, Seodaemun-gu, Seoul, Korea
Authors' Affiliations: 1Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Yonsei University College of Medicine; 2Brain Korea 21 Project for Medical Science of Yonsei University; 3Department of Oral Pathology; 4Oral Cancer Research Institute, Yonsei University College of Dentistry, 50 Yonsei-ro, Seodaemun-gu, Seoul, Korea
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Sunyoung Ham
Authors' Affiliations: 1Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Yonsei University College of Medicine; 2Brain Korea 21 Project for Medical Science of Yonsei University; 3Department of Oral Pathology; 4Oral Cancer Research Institute, Yonsei University College of Dentistry, 50 Yonsei-ro, Seodaemun-gu, Seoul, Korea
Authors' Affiliations: 1Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Yonsei University College of Medicine; 2Brain Korea 21 Project for Medical Science of Yonsei University; 3Department of Oral Pathology; 4Oral Cancer Research Institute, Yonsei University College of Dentistry, 50 Yonsei-ro, Seodaemun-gu, Seoul, Korea
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Jong In Yook
Authors' Affiliations: 1Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Yonsei University College of Medicine; 2Brain Korea 21 Project for Medical Science of Yonsei University; 3Department of Oral Pathology; 4Oral Cancer Research Institute, Yonsei University College of Dentistry, 50 Yonsei-ro, Seodaemun-gu, Seoul, Korea
Authors' Affiliations: 1Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Yonsei University College of Medicine; 2Brain Korea 21 Project for Medical Science of Yonsei University; 3Department of Oral Pathology; 4Oral Cancer Research Institute, Yonsei University College of Dentistry, 50 Yonsei-ro, Seodaemun-gu, Seoul, Korea
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Kunhong Kim
Authors' Affiliations: 1Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Yonsei University College of Medicine; 2Brain Korea 21 Project for Medical Science of Yonsei University; 3Department of Oral Pathology; 4Oral Cancer Research Institute, Yonsei University College of Dentistry, 50 Yonsei-ro, Seodaemun-gu, Seoul, Korea
Authors' Affiliations: 1Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Yonsei University College of Medicine; 2Brain Korea 21 Project for Medical Science of Yonsei University; 3Department of Oral Pathology; 4Oral Cancer Research Institute, Yonsei University College of Dentistry, 50 Yonsei-ro, Seodaemun-gu, Seoul, Korea
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
DOI: 10.1158/1541-7786.MCR-12-0261 Published August 2012
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

Previously, we reported that high PKCK2 activity could protect cancer cells from death receptor–mediated apoptosis through phosphorylation of procaspase-2. Because anoikis is another form of apoptosis, we asked whether PKCK2 could similarly confer resistance to anoikis on cancer cells. Human esophageal squamous cancer cell lines with high PKCK2 activity (HCE4 and HCE7) were anoikis-resistant, whereas cell lines with low PKCK2 activity (TE2 and TE3) were anoikis-sensitive. Because the cells showed different sensitivity to anoikis, we compared the expression of cell adhesion molecules between anoikis-sensitive TE2 and anoikis-resistant HCE4 cells using cDNA microarray. We found that E-cadherin is expressed only in TE2 cells; whereas N-cadherin is expressed instead of E-cadherin in HCE4 cells. To examine whether PKCK2 activity could determine the type of cadherin expressed, we first increased intracellular PKCK2 activity in TE2 cells by overexpressing the PKCK2α catalytic subunit using lentivirus and found that high PKCK2 activity could switch cadherin expression from type E to N and confer anoikis resistance. Conversely, a decrease in PKCK2 activity in HCE4 cells by knockdown of PKCK2α catalytic subunit using shRNA induced N- to E-cadherin switching and the anoikis-resistant cells became sensitive. In addition, N-cadherin expression correlated with PKB/Akt activation and increased invasiveness. We conclude that high intracellular PKCK2 activity confers anoikis resistance on esophageal cancer cells by inducing E- to N-cadherin switching. Mol Cancer Res; 10(8); 1032–8. ©2012 AACR.

Introduction

Six essential alterations in cell physiology can result in malignant growth of cancer cells. These are described as “the hallmarks of cancer” (1) and include: (i) sustaining proliferative signaling, (ii) evading growth suppressors, (iii) resisting cell death, (iv) enabling replicative immortality, (v) inducing angiogenesis, and (vi) activating invasion and metastasis (1). Cancer cell invasion of surrounding tissues and metastasis to distant organs is the primary cause of death for most cancer patients. The sequential steps in the pathogenesis of cancer metastasis include vascularization, invasion, detachment, embolization, survival in the circulation, arrest, extravasation, evasion of host defense, and progressive growth (2). Approximately one million circulating tumor cells are shed per gram of tumor tissue (3, 4) but fewer than 0.1% of cancer cells are viable within 24 hours after entry into the circulation and fewer than 0.01% survive to produce metastases (5). The low success rate of metastasis could result from the presence of physiologic barriers to metastasis such as anoikis and tumor surveillance.

Anoikis is a type of apoptosis that is induced by loss of cell adhesion to the extracellular matrix (ECM) and is an intrinsic characteristic of normal epithelial cells (6). In contrast to normal epithelial cells, cancer cells are resistant to anoikis and adhesion to the ECM is not required for their survival and proliferation. Accordingly, acquisition of anoikis resistance might be a molecular prerequisite for the successful metastatic spread of cancer cells. Cancer cells have developed strategies to become resistant to anoikis, which converge in the activation of survival signals (7). Such strategies include a switch in integrin expression (8, 9), reactive oxygen species–mediated Src oxidation/activation (10, 11), epithelial mesenchymal transition (EMT; refs. 12–14), constitutive activation of survival signaling components such as Src, PKB/Akt, or ERK (15–17), or overexpression of tropomyosin-related kinase B (TrkB; refs. 18 and 19).

PKCK2 is a constitutively active, growth factor–independent serine/threonine protein kinase with key roles in cell-cycle control, cellular differentiation, proliferation, and regulation of apoptosis (20–22). Changes in PKCK2 expression or activity have been reported in many cancer cells (21, 23–25) and overexpression of PKCK2 catalytic subunit can induce tumor formation (23). Inhibition of TNF-related apoptosis inducing ligand (TRAIL) death receptor–mediated apoptosis by PKCK2 might be important in the metastasis of cancer cells (21) because natural killer (NK) cells play a physiological role in tumor surveillance by presenting surface expressed TRAIL to incoming circulating cancer cells to induce apoptosis (26). Incoming cancer cells with high PKCK2 activity are resistant to TRAIL-mediated apoptosis and cannot be removed from the circulation, allowing their successful spread to distant sites (27). PKCK2 is also known as a positive regulator of the Wnt signaling pathway that is important for metastasis of cancer cells (28). Known PKCK2 substrates involved in Wnt signaling are dishevelled, β-catenin, and Snail. Snail is known to repress expression of the adhesion molecule E-cadherin (29, 30). Phosphorylation at Thr 393 on β-catenin protects it from proteosomal degradation, thereby increasing its nuclear translocation and cotranscriptional activity (31, 32). Increased expression of Axin2 by β-catenin results in transportation of GSK3β out of the nucleus, thereby protecting Snail from GSK3β-mediated degradation and inducing E-cadherin downregulation (33). In addition, phosphorylation of Snail at Ser 92 by PKCK2 results in its stabilization and thus downregulates E-cadherin expression (34).

Although PKCK2 acts as an antiapoptotic regulator in death receptor–mediated apoptosis, little is known about its association with anoikis of cancer cells. Accordingly, the purpose of this study was to examine whether PKCK2 confers anoikis resistance on esophageal cancer cells.

Materials and Methods

Cell culture and reagents

The human esophageal cancer cell lines TE2, TE3, HCE4, and HCE7 were grown as previously described (35). To induce anoikis, cells were plated on poly-2-hydroxyethylmethacrylate-coated culture plates (poly-HEMA; Sigma-Aldrich) as previously described (36).

cDNA microarray

The cDNA microarray assay was conducted using a GEArrayTMQ series kit purchased from Superarray Bioscience Co. and was used according to the manufacturer's protocol.

Western blot analysis

Western blot analysis was carried out as previously described (37). Cells were lysed in RIPA buffer (1 M Tris [pH 8.0], 5 M NaCl, 100 mmol/L EGTA, 10% NP-40, and 0.25% sodium deoxycholic acid) with 1× complete protease inhibitor cocktail (Roche Diagnostics). Lysates were briefly vortexed and cleared by centrifugation at 12,000 r.p.m. for 10 minutes at 4°C. Supernatants were collected and protein concentration determined by Bradford assay (Bio-Rad). SDS-PAGE (10–12%) was conducted followed by Western blotting. The blotted membranes were immunostained with antibodies specific for the following antigens: Akt, phospho-Akt (Ser-473), PARP, cleaved caspase-3 (Cell Signaling Technology Inc.); procaspase-3 (BD Pharmingen); E-cadherin, N-cadherin (Invitrogen Co.); keratin10, involucrin, vimentin, α-tubulin (Santa Cruz Biotechnology Inc.); PKCK2α (Upstate), and β-actin (Sigma-Aldrich Co.). The signals were developed using a standard enhanced chemiluminescence method according to the manufacturer's protocol (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech Inc.).

Cell proliferation assay

Cells were plated on poly-HEMA-coated tissue culture plates and proliferation rates were measured using a sulforhodamine B colorimetric (SRB) assay. After collection of the cells and removal of the medium by aspiration, cells were fixed in 50 μL ice-cold 10% trichloroacetic acid (TCA) and incubated at 4°C for 30 to 60 minutes. The cells were washed 5 times with water and allowed to air dry for 5 minutes. Fifty microliters of 0.4% sulforhodamine B solution in 1% acetic acid was added and the cells were incubated for 30 minutes at room temperature. The stained cells were washed 4 times with 1% acetic acid and allowed to air dry for 5 minutes, solubilized in 100 μL of 10 mmol/L Tris (pH 10.5), and placed on an orbital rotator for 5 minutes. Supernatants were collected and absorbance at 570 nm was read using an UV-spectrophotometer.

RNA interference, lentiviral expression, and generation of stable cell lines

siRNA was purchased from Dharmacon, Inc. (Option A4). The target sequence for N-cadherin was CAUAUGUGAUGACCGUAAC (nucleotides 851–869). Cells were transfected with siRNA using Lipofectamine 2000 (Invitrogen Life Technology) according to the manufacturer's protocols. For overexpression of PKCK2α, the lentivirus vector Lentipgk-GFP mCMV-HA-PKCK2α IRESpuro was purchased from Macrogen and cotransfected into 293FT cells with packaging plasmids. The resulting supernatant containing PKCK2α-expressing lentivirus was used to transduce cells according to the manufacturer's protocol (Macrogen). Transduced cells were selected using puromycin (1 μg/mL). A human shRNA kit for silencing PKCK2α expression was purchased from Origene Technologies Inc. To obtain stable transfectants, cells were transfected with the plasmid and then treated with puromycin (2 μg/mL) for selection.

In vitro PKCK2 kinase activity assay

Intracellular PKCK2 activity was measured using an in vitro kinase assay as previously described with slight modification (25). Briefly, 3 μg of bacterially expressed GST-CS (CK2 substrate) protein was incubated with glutathione Sepharose 4B beads for 60 minutes and washed twice with 1× kinase buffer (4 mmol/L MOPS, pH 7.2, 5 mmol/L β-glycerolphosphate, 1 mmol/L EGTA, 200 μmol/L sodium orthovanadate, and 200 μmol/L DTT). The beads were then incubated with 100 μg cell lysate in a final volume of 50 μL kinase reaction buffer (10 μL of 5× kinase buffer), 10 μL magnesium/ATP cocktail solution [90 μL of 75 mmol/L MgCl2/500 mmol/L ATP plus 10 μL (100 μCi) [γ-32P]-ATP] for 20 minutes at 30°C. Reactions were stopped by washing twice with 1× kinase buffer. Samples were resuspended with 30 μL of 2× SDS sample loading buffer, subjected to 12% SDS-PAGE followed by staining with Coomassie brilliant blue, and dried on Whatman papers. Incorporation of 32P was detected by autoradiography.

Cell invasion assay

The cell invasion assay was conducted using a Cell Invasion Assay Kit purchased from CHEMICON International, Inc.

Results

Endogenous PKCK2 activity and anoikis

To examine whether intracellular PKCK2 activity is a determinant of anoikis resistance, esophageal cancer cell lines that show high (HCE4 and HCE7) or low (TE2 and TE3) PKCK2 activity (21) were cultured on poly-HEMA coated tissue culture plates. A cell viability assay showed that the number of HCE4 or HCE7 cells was increased 7.5- and 5-fold respectively, at 48 hours after suspension, whereas the number of TE2 or TE3 cells decreased 0.5-fold under the same conditions (Fig. 1A). Unlike anoikis-sensitive TE2 cells, anoikis-resistant HCE4 cells formed large, spheroid aggregates in suspension (Fig. 1B). Western blot analysis showed that TE2 cells began to undergo apoptosis after 24 hours in suspension but HCE4 cells did not, even after 48 hours of suspension (Fig. 1C). These results suggest that PKCK2 activity might be a determinant of anoikis resistance.

Figure 1.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 1.

PKCK2 activity and anoikis. A, TE2, TE3, HCE4, or HCE7 cells were cultured on the poly-HEMA-coated tissue culture plates for the indicated times and tested for viability with the SRB assay. The data are expressed as mean ± SD for triplicates. B, TE2 and HCE4 cells were plated on poly-HEMA-coated tissue culture plate (Poly-HEMA+) and photographed using phase contrast microscopy 16 hours after plating. C, Western blot analysis was conducted to confirm apoptosis using cell lysates for the indicated time points.

Cadherin expression and anoikis

Because the cancer cells responded differently to detachment, we compared the expression level of adhesion molecules between anoikis-sensitive TE2 and anoikis-resistant HCE4 cells using the GEArrayTM Q series Human Extracellular Matrix & Adhesion Molecules Gene Array, which contains 96 genes encoding proteins important for the attachment of cells to their surroundings. E-cadherin expression was observed only in TE2 cells (data not shown) and this differential cadherin expression was confirmed by Western blot analysis (Fig. 2A and Supplementary Fig. S1). Although HCE4 cells express keratin 10 and involucrin, markers of terminal differentiation of epithelial cells, they also express vimentin, a marker for mesenchymal cells, and N-cadherin instead of E-cadherin, suggesting that the cells might be able to transit from epithelial to mesenchymal cells (Fig. 2A). To examine whether the expression of N-cadherin is required for survival of cancer cells in suspension, N-cadherin expression in HCE4 cells was silenced using siRNA. Although HCE4 cells that expressed N-cadherin were resistant to anoikis, N-cadherin-silenced HCE4 cells underwent anoikis (Fig. 2B). These data indicate that N-cadherin expression is necessary for cancer cells to become resistant to anoikis.

Figure 2.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 2.

Cadherin expression and anoikis. A, Western blot analysis of epithelial or mesenchymal markers and PKB/Akt activation. B, N-cadherin downregulation, PKB/Akt inactivation, and anoikis. HCE4 cells were transfected with either a scrambled siRNA (Sc) or N-cadherin siRNA (N) for 48 hours. The cells were then cultured on poly-HEMA-coated plates for 48 hours. Cell viability assay (left) and Western blot analysis (right) were carried out. The data are expressed as mean ± SD for triplicates.

PKCK2 activity and cadherin switching

To examine whether there is a causal relationship between intracellular PKCK2 activity and the type of cadherin expressed in the cell, the PKCK2α catalytic subunit was either overexpressed in TE2 cells using lentivirus or knocked-down in HCE4 cells using shRNA to increase or decrease intracellular PKCK2 activity, respectively. Overexpression of PKCK2α catalytic subunit in TE2 cells resulted in a marked increase in PKCK2 activity, epithelial–mesenchymal transition as evidenced by E-to N-cadherin switching, and the induction of vimentin expression (Fig. 3A). As expected, TE2-GFP cells underwent anoikis whereas TE2-CK2α cells were resistant to anoikis (Fig. 3B). When N-cadherin expression was knocked-down in TE2-CK2α cells using siRNA against N-cadherin, the cells reverted to anoikis sensitivity (Fig. 3C).

Figure 3.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 3.

E-to N-cadherin switching and anoikis resistance. A, TE2 cells were transduced with lentivirus-expressing HA-tagged PKCK2 α catalytic subunit. Western blot analysis and in vitro kinase assay for intracellular PKCK2 activity were conducted. 32P-GST-CS (GST-tagged recombinant CK2 Substrate) represents phosphorylated GST-CS and GST-CS represents Coomassie blue stained input GST-CS. B, TE2-GFP and TE2-CK2α cells were cultured on poly-HEMA-coated plates for 48 hours. Western blot analysis (top) and cell viability assay (bottom) were conducted. The data are expressed as mean ± SD for triplicates. C, TE2-CK2α cells were transfected with either a scrambled siRNA (Sc) or N-cadherin siRNA (N) for 48 hours. The cells were then cultured on poly-HEMA-coated plates for 48 hours. Western blot analysis (top) and cell viability assay (bottom) were conducted. The data are expressed as mean ± SD for triplicates.

Conversely, knockdown of the PKCK2α subunit in HCE4 cells (HCE4 CKD) resulted in a decrease in PKCK2 activity, mesenchymal–epithelial transition as evidenced by N-to E-cadherin switching, and reduction of vimentin expression (Fig. 4A). The expression pattern of mRNA for each gene (E-cadherin, N-cadherin, vimentin, and PKCK2α) was the same as that of protein (data not shown). Control HCE4 cells (HCE4 VC) were resistant to anoikis whereas HCE4 CKD cells became apoptotic after 48 hours of suspension (Fig. 4B). Taken together, these results indicate that PCKC2 activity determines the type of cadherin expressed on the cells.

Figure 4.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 4.

N-to E-cadherin switching and anoikis. A, HCE4 cells were stably transfected with shRNA against PKCK2 α catalytic subunit and treated with puromycin for selection. Western blot analysis and in vitro kinase assay for intracellular PKCK2 activity were conducted. B, HCE4-VC (Vector control) and HCE4-CKD (CK2 α knockdown) cells were cultured on poly-HEMA-coated plates for 48 hours. Western blot analysis (top) and cell viability assay (bottom) were conducted. The data are expressed as mean ± SD for triplicates.

N-cadherin–mediated PKB/Akt activation

Because PKB/Akt is a well-known survival signal, we measured PKB/Akt activity in these cells by Western blot analysis of Akt ser-473 phosphorylation (36, 37) and found that PKB/Akt was active in N-cadherin-expressing HCE4, HCE7 cells (Fig. 2A and Supplementary Fig. S1B) and TE2-CK2α cells (Fig. 3B, top) that are resistant to anoikis. When N-cadherin expression was knocked-down using siRNA in HCE4 (Fig. 2B) or TE2-CK2α cells (Fig. 3C), PKB/Akt activity was decreased and the cells became apoptotic in suspension. These results indicate that PKCK2-dependent upregulation of N-cadherin could activate PKB/Akt, thereby conferring anoikis resistance on cancer cells.

Increased invasiveness by N-cadherin

It has been known that N-cadherin-expressing cancer cells are more invasive and metastatic than E-cadherin-expressing cells (38–40). Thus, we examined invasiveness using a cell invasion assay kit and found that N-cadherin-expressing HCE4, HCE7, and TE2-CK2α cells were more invasive than E-cadherin-expressing TE2, TE3, and TE2-GFP cells (Fig. 5A and B). In addition, N-cadherin-silenced HCE4 cells (N) were less invasive than N-cadherin-expressing HCE4 cells (Sc, Fig. 5C). These results indicate that cancer cells that have high intracellular PKCK2 activity become more invasive probably because of N-cadherin upregulation.

Figure 5.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 5.

N-cadherin expression and invasiveness. A, in vitro invasiveness of TE2, TE3, HCE4, and HCE7 cells were measured using a Cell Invasion Assay Kit. B, in vitro invasiveness of TE2-GFP and TE2-CK2α cells. C, in vitro invasiveness of HCE4 cells that were transfected with either a scrambled siRNA (Sc) or N-cadherin siRNA (N) for 48 hours. The data are expressed as mean ± SD for triplicates.

Discussion

This study shows that intracellular high PKCK2 activity confers anoikis resistance on esophageal cancer cells. We found that high intracellular PKCK2 activity could induce E- to N-cadherin switching (Fig. 3A). Upregulation of N-cadherin could activate PKB/Akt, thereby making cancer cells resistant to anoikis (Figs. 2 and 3B, Supplementary Fig. S1B) as previously reported in human melanoma and prostate carcinoma cells (41, 42).

To induce E- to N-cadherin switching, PKCK2 must play dual roles. The first is downregulation of E-cadherin expression. Snail is a well-known transcriptional repressor of E-cadherin gene expression (29, 30), and PKCK2 might stabilize Snail protein both directly and indirectly, thereby resulting in downregulation of E-cadherin. Direct phosphorylation on Snail at serine 92 could induce stabilization of Snail protein (34 and Supplementary Fig. S2). Phosphorylation on β-catenin at threonine 393 (31, 32) also could stabilize Snail protein indirectly through nuclear β-catenin–mediated upregulation of Axin2 expression, Axin2-mediated GSK3β shuttling out from nucleus, and inhibition of GSK3β-mediated Snail degradation (33 and Supplementary Fig. S3).

The second role of PKCK2 in E- to N-cadherin switching is upregulation of N-cadherin gene expression. Unlike E-cadherin gene regulation, little is known about PKCK2-dependent regulation of N-cadherin expression. PKCK2 phosphorylates many target proteins to regulate their function (43–45) and/or the expression of genes downstream (33, 45). Thus, it is possible that Myeloid Zinc Finger-1 (MZF1), a known transcriptional factor required for N-cadherin gene expression (46) could be a substrate of PKCK2 and may thus become stabilized and upregulate N-cadherin expression.

In summary, we have shown that high intracellular PKCK2 activity confers anoikis resistance on cancer cells by inducing E- to N-cadherin switching. These findings suggest that PKCK2 may play important roles in cancer metastasis, because PKCK2 could induce EMT, confer anoikis resistance, and/or enhance NK cell tumor surveillance.

Disclosure of Potential Conflicts of Interest

No potential conflicts of interest were disclosed.

Grant Support

This work was supported by the Korea Research Foundation Grant funded by the Korean government (MOEHRD; KRF-2007-314-C00199) and FG08-31-06 of the 21C Frontier Functional Human Genome Project from the Ministry of Education, Science and Technology, Korea. Financial support provided by KRICT (SI-1205) and Ministry of Knowledge Economy, Korea is gratefully acknowledged.

The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. This article must therefore be hereby marked advertisement in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.

Footnotes

  • Note: Supplementary data for this article are available at Molecular Cancer Research Online (http://mcr.aacrjournals.org/).

  • Received April 25, 2012.
  • Revision received June 25, 2012.
  • Accepted June 26, 2012.
  • ©2012 American Association for Cancer Research.

References

  1. 1.↵
    1. Hanahan D,
    2. Weinberg RA
    . Hallmarks of cancer: the next generation. Cell 2011;144:646–74.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  2. 2.↵
    1. Fidler IJ
    . The pathogenesis of cancer metastasis: the ‘seed and soil' hypothesis revisited. Nat Rev Cancer 2003;3:453–8.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  3. 3.↵
    1. Butler TP,
    2. Gullino PM
    . Quantitation of cell shedding into efferent blood of mammary adenocarcinoma. Cancer Res 1975;35:512–6.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  4. 4.↵
    1. Chang YS,
    2. di Tomaso E,
    3. McDonald DM,
    4. Jones R,
    5. Jain RK,
    6. Munn LL
    . Mosaic blood vessels in tumors: frequency of cancer cells in contact with flowing blood. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2000;97:14608–13.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  5. 5.↵
    1. Fidler IJ
    . Metastasis: guantitative analysis of distribution and fate of tumor embolilabeled with 125 I-5-iodo-2′-deoxyuridine. J Natl Cancer Inst 1970;45:773–82.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  6. 6.↵
    1. Frisch SM,
    2. Francis H
    . Disruption of epithelial cell-matrix interactions induces apoptosis. J Cell Biol 1994;124:619–26.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  7. 7.↵
    1. Taddei ML,
    2. Giannoni E,
    3. Fiaschi T,
    4. Chiarugi P
    . Anoikis: an emerging hallmark in health and diseases. J Pathol 2012;226:380–93.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  8. 8.↵
    1. Jones J,
    2. Watt FM,
    3. Speight PM
    . Changes in the expression of alpha v integrins in oral squamous cell carcinomas. J Oral Pathol Med 1997;26:63–8.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  9. 9.↵
    1. Regezi JA,
    2. Ramos DM,
    3. Pytela R,
    4. Dekker NP,
    5. Jordan RC
    . Tenascin and beta 6 integrin are overexpressed in floor of mouth in situ carcinomas and invasive squamous cell carcinomas. Oral Oncol 2002;38:332–6.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  10. 10.↵
    1. Giannoni E,
    2. Buricchi F,
    3. Grimaldi G,
    4. Parri M,
    5. Cialdai F,
    6. Taddei ML,
    7. et al.
    Redox regulation of anoikis: reactive oxygen species as essential mediators of cell survival. Cell Death Differentiation 2008;15:867–78.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  11. 11.↵
    1. Zhu P,
    2. Tan MJ,
    3. Huang RL,
    4. Tan CK,
    5. Chong HC,
    6. Pal M,
    7. et al.
    Angiopoietin-like 4 protein elevates the prosurvival intracellular O2(−):H2O2 ratio and confers anoikis resistance to tumors. Cancer Cell 2011;19:401–15.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  12. 12.↵
    1. Thompson EW,
    2. Newgreen DF,
    3. Tarin D
    . Carcinoma invasion and metastasis: a role for epithelial-mesenchymal transition? Cancer Res 2005;65:5991–5; discussion 5.
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  13. 13.↵
    1. Onder TT,
    2. Gupta PB,
    3. Mani SA,
    4. Yang J,
    5. Lander ES,
    6. Weinberg RA
    . Loss of E-cadherin promotes metastasis via multiple downstream transcriptional pathways. Cancer Res 2008;68:3645–54.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  14. 14.↵
    1. Cavallaro U,
    2. Christofori G
    . Cell adhesion and signalling by cadherins and Ig-CAMs in cancer. Nat Rev Cancer 2004;4:118–32.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  15. 15.↵
    1. Giannoni E,
    2. Fiaschi T,
    3. Ramponi G,
    4. Chiarugi P
    . Redox regulation of anoikis resistance of metastatic prostate cancer cells: key role for Src and EGFR-mediated pro-survival signals. Oncogene 2009;28:2074–86.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  16. 16.↵
    1. Sakamoto S,
    2. Kyprianou N
    . Targeting anoikis resistance in prostate cancer metastasis. Mol Aspects Med 2010;31:205–14.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  17. 17.↵
    1. Khwaja A,
    2. Rodriguez-Viciana P,
    3. Wennstrom S,
    4. Warne PH,
    5. Downward J
    . Matrix adhesion and Ras transformation both activate a phosphoinositide 3-OH kinase and protein kinase B/Akt cellular survival pathway. EMBO J 1997;16:2783–93.
    OpenUrlAbstract
  18. 18.↵
    1. Douma S,
    2. Van Laar T,
    3. Zevenhoven J,
    4. Meuwissen R,
    5. Van Garderen E,
    6. Peeper DS
    . Suppression of anoikis and induction of metastasis by the neurotrophic receptor TrkB. Nature 2004;430:1034–9.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  19. 19.↵
    1. Smit MA,
    2. Geiger TR,
    3. Song JY,
    4. Gitelman I,
    5. Peeper DS
    . A Twist-Snail axis critical for TrkB-induced epithelial-mesenchymal transition-like transformation, anoikis resistance, and metastasis. Mol Cell Biol 2009;29:3722–37.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  20. 20.↵
    1. Ahmad KA,
    2. Wang G,
    3. Slaton J,
    4. Unger G,
    5. Ahmed K
    . Targeting CK2 for cancer therapy. Anticancer Drugs 2005;16:1037–43.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  21. 21.↵
    1. Shin S,
    2. Lee Y,
    3. Kim W,
    4. Ko H,
    5. Choi H,
    6. Kim K
    . Caspase-2 primes cancer cells for TRAIL-mediated apoptosis by processing procaspase-8. EMBO J 2005;24:3532–42.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  22. 22.↵
    1. Song K,
    2. Chen Y,
    3. Goke R,
    4. Wilmen A,
    5. Seidel C,
    6. Goke A,
    7. et al.
    Tumor necrosis factor-related apoptosis-inducing ligand (TRAIL) is an inhibitor of autoimmune inflammation and cell cycle progression. J Exp Med 2000;191:1095–104.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  23. 23.↵
    1. Landesman-Bollag E,
    2. Romieu-Mourez R,
    3. Song DH,
    4. Sonenshein GE,
    5. Cardiff RD,
    6. Seldin DC
    . Protein kinase CK2 in mammary gland tumorigenesis. Oncogene 2001;20:3247–57.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  24. 24.↵
    1. Kim JS,
    2. Eom JI,
    3. Cheong JW,
    4. Choi AJ,
    5. Lee JK,
    6. Yang WI,
    7. et al.
    Protein kinase CK2alpha as an unfavorable prognostic marker and novel therapeutic target in acute myeloid leukemia. Clin Cancer Res 2007;13:1019–28.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  25. 25.↵
    1. Scaglioni PP,
    2. Yung TM,
    3. Cai LF,
    4. Erdjument-Bromage H,
    5. Kaufman AJ,
    6. Singh B,
    7. et al.
    A CK2-dependent mechanism for degradation of the PML tumor suppressor. Cell 2006;126:269–83.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  26. 26.↵
    1. Takeda K,
    2. Hayakawa Y,
    3. Smyth MJ,
    4. Kayagaki N,
    5. Yamaguchi N,
    6. Kakuta S,
    7. et al.
    Involvement of tumor necrosis factor-related apoptosis-inducing ligand in surveillance of tumor metastasis by liver natural killer cells. Nat Med 2001;7:94–100.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  27. 27.↵
    1. Kim HR,
    2. Kim K,
    3. Lee KH,
    4. Kim SJ,
    5. Kim J
    . Inhibition of casein kinase 2 enhances the death ligand- and natural killer cell-induced hepatocellular carcinoma cell death. Clin Exp Immunol 2008;152:336–44.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  28. 28.↵
    1. Seldin DC,
    2. Landesman-Bollag E,
    3. Farago M,
    4. Currier N,
    5. Lou D,
    6. Dominguez I
    . CK2 as a positive regulator of Wnt signalling and tumourigenesis. Mol Cell Biochem 2005;274:63–7.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  29. 29.↵
    1. Batlle E,
    2. Sancho E,
    3. Franci C,
    4. Dominguez D,
    5. Monfar M,
    6. Baulida J,
    7. et al.
    The transcription factor snail is a repressor of E-cadherin gene expression in epithelial tumour cells. Nat Cell Biol 2000;2:84–9.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  30. 30.↵
    1. Yook JI,
    2. Li XY,
    3. Ota I,
    4. Fearon ER,
    5. Weiss SJ
    . Wnt-dependent regulation of the E-cadherin repressor snail. J Biol Chem 2005;280:11740–8.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  31. 31.↵
    1. Polakis P
    . The many ways of Wnt in cancer. Curr Opin Genet Dev 2007;17:45–51.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  32. 32.↵
    1. Song DH,
    2. Dominguez I,
    3. Mizuno J,
    4. Kaut M,
    5. Mohr SC,
    6. Seldin DC
    . CK2 phosphorylation of the armadillo repeat region of beta-catenin potentiates Wnt signaling. J Biol Chem 2003;278:24018–25.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  33. 33.↵
    1. Yook JI,
    2. Li XY,
    3. Ota I,
    4. Hu C,
    5. Kim HS,
    6. Kim NH,
    7. et al.
    A Wnt-Axin2-GSK3beta cascade regulates Snail1 activity in breast cancer cells. Nat Cell Biol 2006;8:1398–406.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  34. 34.↵
    1. MacPherson MR,
    2. Molina P,
    3. Souchelnytskyi S,
    4. Wernstedt C,
    5. Martin-Perez J,
    6. Portillo F,
    7. et al.
    Phosphorylation of serine 11 and serine 92 as new positive regulators of human Snail1 function: potential involvement of casein kinase-2 and the cAMP-activated kinase protein kinase A. Mol Biol Cell 2010;21:244–53.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  35. 35.↵
    1. Kim K,
    2. Fisher MJ,
    3. Xu SQ,
    4. el-Deiry WS
    . Molecular determinants of response to TRAIL in killing of normal and cancer cells. Clin Cancer Res 2000;6:335–46.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  36. 36.↵
    1. Fiucci G,
    2. Ravid D,
    3. Reich R,
    4. Liscovitch M
    . Caveolin-1 inhibits anchorage-independent growth, anoikis and invasiveness in MCF-7 human breast cancer cells. Oncogene 2002;21:2365–75.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  37. 37.↵
    1. Kim K,
    2. Nakagawa H,
    3. Fei P,
    4. Rustgi AK,
    5. El-Deiry WS
    . Targeting Bcl-x(L) in esophageal squamous cancer to sensitize to chemotherapy plus TRAIL-induced apoptosis while normal epithelial cells are protected by blockade of caspase 9. Cell Death Differ 2004;11:583–7.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  38. 38.↵
    1. Asano K,
    2. Duntsch CD,
    3. Zhou Q,
    4. Weimar JD,
    5. Bordelon D,
    6. Robertson JH,
    7. et al.
    Correlation of N-cadherin expression in high grade gliomas with tissue invasion. J Neurooncol 2004;70:3–15.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  39. 39.↵
    1. Nakajima S,
    2. Doi R,
    3. Toyoda E,
    4. Tsuji S,
    5. Wada M,
    6. Koizumi M,
    7. et al.
    N-cadherin expression and epithelial-mesenchymal transition in pancreatic carcinoma. Clin Cancer Res 2004;10:4125–33.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  40. 40.↵
    1. Yoshinaga K,
    2. Inoue H,
    3. Utsunomiya T,
    4. Sonoda H,
    5. Masuda T,
    6. Mimori K,
    7. et al.
    N-cadherin is regulated by activin A and associated with tumor aggressiveness in esophageal carcinoma. Clin Cancer Res 2004;10:5702–7.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  41. 41.↵
    1. Li G,
    2. Satyamoorthy K,
    3. Herlyn M
    . N-cadherin-mediated intercellular interactions promote survival and migration of melanoma cells. Cancer Res 2001;61:3819–25.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  42. 42.↵
    1. Tran NL,
    2. Adams DG,
    3. Vaillancourt RR,
    4. Heimark RL
    . Signal transduction from N-cadherin increases Bcl-2. Regulation of the phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase/Akt pathway by homophilic adhesion and actin cytoskeletal organization. J Biol Chem 2002;277:32905–14.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  43. 43.↵
    1. Calvert ME,
    2. Keck KM,
    3. Ptak C,
    4. Shabanowitz J,
    5. Hunt DF,
    6. Pemberton LF
    . Phosphorylation by casein kinase 2 regulates Nap1 localization and function. Mol Cell Biol 2008;28:1313–25.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  44. 44.↵
    1. Di Maira G,
    2. Salvi M,
    3. Arrigoni G,
    4. Marin O,
    5. Sarno S,
    6. Brustolon F,
    7. et al.
    Protein kinase CK2 phosphorylates and upregulates Akt/PKB. Cell Death Differ 2005;12:668–77.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  45. 45.↵
    1. Zhou Y,
    2. Gross W,
    3. Hong SH,
    4. Privalsky ML
    . The SMRT corepressor is a target of phosphorylation by protein kinase CK2 (casein kinase II). Mol Cell Biochem 2001;220:1–13.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  46. 46.↵
    1. Le Mee S,
    2. Fromigue O,
    3. Marie PJ
    . Sp1/Sp3 and the myeloid zinc finger gene MZF1 regulate the human N-cadherin promoter in osteoblasts. Exp Cell Res 2005;302:129–42.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
PreviousNext
Back to top
Molecular Cancer Research: 10 (8)
August 2012
Volume 10, Issue 8
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • About the Cover

Sign up for alerts

View this article with LENS

Open full page PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for sharing this Molecular Cancer Research article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Protein Kinase Casein Kinase 2–Mediated Upregulation of N-Cadherin Confers Anoikis Resistance on Esophageal Carcinoma Cells
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from Molecular Cancer Research
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in Molecular Cancer Research.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Protein Kinase Casein Kinase 2–Mediated Upregulation of N-Cadherin Confers Anoikis Resistance on Esophageal Carcinoma Cells
Hyeonseok Ko, Seongrak Kim, Cheng-Hao Jin, Eunjung Lee, Sunyoung Ham, Jong In Yook and Kunhong Kim
Mol Cancer Res August 1 2012 (10) (8) 1032-1038; DOI: 10.1158/1541-7786.MCR-12-0261

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Protein Kinase Casein Kinase 2–Mediated Upregulation of N-Cadherin Confers Anoikis Resistance on Esophageal Carcinoma Cells
Hyeonseok Ko, Seongrak Kim, Cheng-Hao Jin, Eunjung Lee, Sunyoung Ham, Jong In Yook and Kunhong Kim
Mol Cancer Res August 1 2012 (10) (8) 1032-1038; DOI: 10.1158/1541-7786.MCR-12-0261
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Introduction
    • Materials and Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Disclosure of Potential Conflicts of Interest
    • Grant Support
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Advertisement

Related Articles

Cited By...

More in this TOC Section

  • Role of Bcl-xL in a Multimodality Treatment
  • SUZ12 Promotes EOC via Silencing HRK
  • TLE1 Regulates Anoikis
Show more Cell Cycle, Cell Death, and Senescence
  • Home
  • Alerts
  • Feedback
  • Privacy Policy
Facebook  Twitter  LinkedIn  YouTube  RSS

Articles

  • Online First
  • Current Issue
  • Past Issues
  • Rapid Impact Archive
  • Meeting Abstracts

Information for

  • Authors
  • Subscribers
  • Advertisers
  • Librarians

About MCR

  • About the Journal
  • Editorial Board
  • Permissions
  • Submit a Manuscript
AACR logo

Copyright © 2021 by the American Association for Cancer Research.

Molecular Cancer Research
eISSN: 1557-3125
ISSN: 1541-7786

Advertisement