Ethyl 2-((2,3-bis(nitrooxy)propyl)disulfanyl)benzoate (GT-094) is a novel nitric oxide (NO) chimera containing an nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID) and NO moieties and also a disulfide pharmacophore that in itself exhibits cancer chemopreventive activity. In this study, the effects and mechanism of action of GT-094 were investigated in RKO and SW480 colon cancer cells. GT-094 inhibited cell proliferation and induced apoptosis in both cell lines and this was accompanied by decreased mitochondrial membrane potential (MMP) and induction of reactive oxygen species (ROS), and these responses were reversed after cotreatment with the antioxidant glutathione. GT-094 also downregulated genes associated with cell growth [cyclin D1, hepatocyte growth factor receptor (c-Met), epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)], survival (bcl-2, survivin), and angiogenesis [VEGF and its receptors (VEGFR1 and VEGFR2)]. Results of previous RNA interference studies in this laboratory has shown that these genes are regulated, in part, by specificity protein (Sp) transcription factors Sp1, Sp3, and Sp4 that are overexpressed in colon and other cancer cell lines and not surprisingly, GT-094 also decreased Sp1, Sp3, and Sp4 in colon cancer cells. GT-094–mediated repression of Sp and Sp-regulated gene products was due to downregulation of microRNA-27a (miR-27a) and induction of ZBTB10, an Sp repressor that is regulated by miR-27a in colon cancer cells. Moreover, the effects of GT-094 on Sp1, Sp3, Sp4, miR-27a, and ZBTB10 were also inhibited by glutathione suggesting that the anticancer activity of GT-094 in colon cancer cells is due, in part, to activation of an ROS-miR-27a:ZBTB10-Sp transcription factor pathway. Mol Cancer Res; 9(2); 195–205. ©2010 AACR.
Aspirin and other nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAID) are invaluable for treatment of fever, pain, arthritis, other inflammatory diseases, and cancer, and applications for these compounds continues to increase (1–4). Several epidemiology studies have reported decreased incidence of multiple cancers associated with NSAIDs (primarily aspirin) intake, and these drugs have been extensively investigated for their chemopreventive and chemotherapeutic activities (3–5). A recent study reported that aspirin use among women with breast cancer decreased the subsequent incidence of metastasis and cancer-related deaths (5). Aspirin and other NSAIDs play a role in colon cancer prevention and therapy (6–14), and specific NSAIDs and other COX inhibitors also decrease the risk of colon cancer among high-risk individuals (12–14).
Nitric oxide (NO) plays an important role in the suppression of GI-induced inflammation and toxicity, and this has led to development of nitro-NSAIDs (NO-NSAID) which combine the anti-inflammatory activities of NSAIDs with the NO-dependent protection from NSAID-induced GI toxicity. NO-aspirin and other NO-NSAIDs exhibit anticancer activity in a wide range of cancer cell lines and in vivo models (15–27), and these compounds are invariably more potent than their corresponding NSAID analogues. For example, the NO-NSAID analogue 2-(acetyloxybenzoic acid 4-nitrooxymethyl)-phenyl ester (NO-ASA) is 700 times more potent than aspirin as an inhibitor of pancreatic cancer cell growth which is due to inhibition of cell proliferation and induction of apoptosis by both compounds (19). The mechanism of action of NO-NSAIDs as cancer chemotherapeutic agents is unclear; however, these compounds clearly inhibit cancer and tumor cell growth, induce apoptosis, and exhibit antiangiogenic and antimetastatic activity.
Ethyl 2-((2,3-bis(nitrooxy)propyl)disulfanyl)benzoate (GT-094); refs. 25, 26) is a novel NO chimera containing an NSAID and NO moieties and also a disulfide pharmacophore that in itself exhibits cancer chemopreventive activity (28). GT-094 significantly decreases aberrant crypt foci, proliferation, and inducible NO synthase (iNOS) levels in the azoxymethane-induced rat colon cancer (25) and decreases proliferation and arrests Caco-2 colon cancer cells in G2/M phase of the cell cycle (25, 26).
In this study, we investigated the mechanism of action of NO-NSAIDs using GT-094 as a model in RKO and SW480 colon cancer cells. GT-094 inhibited colon cancer cell proliferation and induced apoptosis, and this was accompanied by downregulation of genes associated with cell growth [cyclin D1, hepatocyte growth factor receptor (c-Met), epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)], survival (bcl-2, survivin), and angiogenesis [VEGF and its receptors (VEGFR1 and VEGFR2)]. Previous RNA interference studies in this laboratory has shown that all of these genes are regulated, in part, by specificity protein (Sp) transcription factors Sp1, Sp3, and Sp4 that are overexpressed in colon and other cancer cell lines (29–37). GT-094 also decreased Sp1, Sp3, and Sp4 in colon cancer cells and this was dependent on a decrease in mitochondrial membrane potential (MMP) and induction of reactive oxygen species (ROS). ROS-mediated repression of Sp and Sp-dependent genes involves downregulation of microRNA-27a (miR-27a) and induction of ZBTB10, an Sp repressor, and comparable results have also been observed for synthetic triterpenoid anticancer drugs in pancreatic and colon cancer cells (35, 38).
Materials and Methods
Cell lines, reagents, and antibodies
RKO and SW480 human colon carcinoma cell lines were obtained from American Type Culture Collection. RKO and SW480 cells were maintained in Dulbecco's modified/Ham's F-12 (Sigma-Aldrich) with phenol red supplemented with 0.22% sodium bicarbonate, 5% FBS, and 10 mL/L 100× antibiotic antimycotic solution (Sigma). Cells were grown in 150-cm2 culture plates in an air/CO2 (95:5) atmosphere at 37°C and passaged approximately every 3 to 5 days. GT-094 was synthesized in the laboratory of Dr. Gregory R. Thatcher (University of Illinois, Chicago, IL). All antibodies were purchased from Santa Cruz Biotechnology, except cleaved PARP and c-Met (Cell Signaling Technology), Sp1 and VEGFR2 (Millipore), survivin (R&D Systems), VEGFR1 (Abcam Inc.), and β-actin antibodies (Sigma-Aldrich). Glutathione, 98% (γ-glu-cys-gly, GSH) and carbonyl cyanide 3-chlorophenylhydrazone (CCCP) were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich. Dithiothretol (DTT, 98%) was obtained from Boehringer Mannheim Corp. CM-H2DCFDA was purchased from Invitrogen. MG132 and lactacystin are the proteasomal inhibitors purchased from Calbiochem and Sigma Chemicals Co., respectively.
Cell proliferation assays
RKO and SW480 cancer cell lines were plated (3 × 104 per well) using DMEM:Ham's F-12 medium containing 2.5% charcoal-stripped FBS in 12-well plates and left to attach for 24 hours. Cells were then treated with either vehicle or the indicated concentrations of GT-094. After 24, 48, and 72 hours of treatment, cells were counted using a Coulter Z1 particle counter (39). Each experiment was carried out in triplicate and results are expressed as means ± SE for each determination.
RKO and SW480 cancer cells were seeded in DMEM:Ham's F-12 medium containing 2.5% charcoal-stripped FBS and, after 24 hours, cells were treated with either vehicle (DMSO) or the indicated compounds. Cells were collected using high-salt buffer (50 mmol/L of HEPES, 0.5 mol/L of NaCl, 1.5 mmol/L of MgCl2, 1 mmol/L of EGTA, 10% glycerol, and 1% Triton X-100) and 10 mL/L Protease Inhibitor Cocktail (Sigma-Aldrich). Protein lysates were incubated for 3 minutes at 100°C before electrophoresis and then separated on 10% SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis at 120 V for 3 to 4 hours. Proteins were transferred onto polyvinylidene difluoride (PVDF) membranes by wet electroblotting in a buffer containing 25 mmol/L of Tris, 192 mmol/L of glycine, and 20% methanol for 1.5 hours at 180 mÅ. Membranes were blocked for 30 minutes with 5% Tris-buffered saline with Tween (TBST)-Blotto (10 mmol/L of Tris-HCl, 150 mmol/L of NaCl, pH 8.0, 0.05% Triton X-100, and 5% nonfat dry milk) and incubated in fresh 5% TBST-Blotto with 1:500 primary antibody overnight with gentle shaking at 4°C. After washing with TBST for 10 minutes, the PVDF membrane was incubated with secondary antibody (1:5,000) in 5% TBST-Blotto for 2 hours by gentle shaking. The membrane was washed with TBST for 10 minutes, incubated with 6 mL of chemiluminescence substrate for 1 minute, and exposed to Kodak image station 4000 mm Pro (Carestream Health).
Cellular ROS levels were evaluated with the cell permeant probe CM-H2DCFDA (5-(and-6)-chloromethyl-2′,7′ dichlorodihydrofluorescein diacetate acetyl ester). CM-H2DCFDA is nonfluorescent until removal of the acetate groups by intercellular esterases and oxidation occurs within the cell. Following treatment of the cells for 12 hours, 48-well cell culture plates were loaded with 10 μmol/L of CM-H2DCFDA for 30 minutes, washed once with serum-free medium, and analyzed for ROS levels using Bio Tek Synergy 4 plate reader (Bio Tek Instruments, Inc.) set at 480 nm and 525 nm excitation and emission wavelengths, respectively. Cells were then washed twice with PBS and fixed with methanol for 3 minutes at room temperature. Methanol was then completely removed and 1 mg/mL Janus green was added to the cultures for 3 minutes. Following removal of Janus green, cultures were washed twice with PBS and 100 μL of 50% methanol was added to each well. Cell counts were then determined with the plate reader set to an absorbance of 654 nm, and ROS intensities were corrected accordingly. Three experiments were performed and analyzed on different days using 8 wells per treatment group, and results are expressed as means ± SE for each determination.
Terminal deoxyribonucleotide transferase-mediated nick-end labeling assay
RKO and SW480 cells (10 × 104) were seeded in 2-chambered glass slides and left overnight to attach. After treatment with indicated compounds for 12 hours, the in situ cell death detection POD kit was used for the terminal deoxyribonucleotide transferase-mediated nick-end labeling (TUNEL) assay according to the instructions in the protocol manual for fixed cells. The percentage of apoptotic cells was calculated by counting the stained cells in eight fields, each containing 50 cells. The total number of apoptotic cells was plotted as a percentage in both cell lines.
Measurement of MMP
MMP was measured with the Mitochondrial Membrane Potential Detection Kit (Stratagene) according to manufacturer's protocol using JC-1 dye. RKO and SW480 colon cancer cells were plated on 2-well Lab-Tex Coverglass slides (NUNC A/S) and, after 24 hours, cells were treated with DMSO, CCCP (25 μmol/L), GT-094 (50 μmol/L) alone or with GSH (5 mmol/L) for 12 hours. Cells were then incubated with 1× JC-1 dye at 37°C for 15 minutes and washed twice with assay buffer according to manufacturer's protocol and then cells were subjected to microscopic analysis using Zeiss Stallion Dual Detector Imaging System (Carl Zeiss Microimaging Inc.). J-aggregates are detected as red fluorescence, and J-monomers are detected as green fluorescence. The ratio of red fluorescence to green fluorescence was measured using ImageJ Software. Cells were examined in more than 10 fields per slide on multiple slides. Data represent the average of all the fields and results are expressed as means ± SE for each determination.
Quantitative real-time PCR analysis of messenger RNAs and miRNAs
miRNA was extracted using the mirvaRNA extraction kit (Applied Biosystems). Quantification of miRNA (RNU6B, miRNA-27a) was performed using the Taqman miRNA kit (Applied Biosystems) according to the manufacturer's protocol with real-time PCR. U6 small nuclear RNA was used as a control to determine relative miRNA expression. Total RNA was isolated using the RNeasy Protect Mini kit (Qiagen) according to the manufacturer's protocol. RNA was reverse transcribed using Superscript II reverse transcriptase (Invitrogen) according to the manufacturer's protocol. PCR was carried out with the SYBR Green PCR Master Mix from PE Applied Biosystems on an ABI Prism 7700 Sequence Detection System (PE Applied Biosystems) using 0.5 μmol/L of each primer and 2 μL cDNA template in each 25-μL reaction. TATA-binding protein (TBP) was used as an exogenous control to compare the relative amount of target gene in different samples. The PCR profile was as follows: one cycle of 95°C for 10 minutes, then 40 cycles of 95°C for 15 seconds, and 60°C for 1 minute. The comparative CT method was used for relative quantitation of samples, and results are expressed as means ± SE for at least 3 separate determinations. Primers were purchased from Integrated DNA Technologies. The following primers were used:
TBP (F): 5′-TGCACAGGAGCCAAGAGTGAA-3′
TBP (R): 5′-CACATCACAGCTCCCCACCA-3′
ZBTB10 (F): 5′-GCTGGATAGTAGTTATGTTGC-3′
ZBTB10 (R): 5′-CTGAGTGGTTTGATGGACAGA-3′
Statistical significance of differences was determined by ANOVA and Student's t test, and the levels of probability were noted. All statistical tests were 2-sided. IC50 values were calculated using nonlinear regression analysis and expressed in μmol/L, at 95% CIs.
GT-094 is a model nitro-NSAID analogue (NO-chimera) that contains both the aliphatic nitro group and a disulfide linker, and this compound exhibits cancer chemoprevention activity in an in vivo model for colon cancer. In this study, we initially investigated the concentration- and time-dependent effects of GT-094 on proliferation of RKO and SW480 colon cancer cells (Fig. 1A). Significant growth inhibition was observed in both cell lines and the 24-hour IC50 values for growth inhibition were 36 and 44 μmol/L in RKO and SW480 cells, respectively. In addition, the proapoptotic effects were examined in RKO and SW480 cells, and GT-094 induced caspase-dependent PARP cleavage in both the cell lines (Fig. 1B). GT-094 decreased expression of prosurvival survivin and bcl-2 proteins, and this was consistent with the observed caspase-dependent PARP cleavage. GT-094 inhibited cell proliferation and induced apoptosis in RKO and SW480 cells and therefore, the effects of GT-094 on gene products associated with cell proliferation and apoptosis were also investigated. Results in Figure 1C show that GT-094 decreased expression of several proteins involved in cell proliferation and these included cyclin D1, c-Met, and EGFR in both RKO and SW480 cells. In addition, we observed that GT-094 decreased expression of the angiogenic growth factor VEGF and its receptor, VEGFR1, in RKO and SW480 cells (Fig. 1D).
Previous studies with agents, such as curcumin, betulinic acid, synthetic triterpenoid anticancer drugs, and the NSAID tolfenamic acid, show that these compounds decrease expression of bcl-2, survivin, c-Met, EGFR, cyclin D1, VEGF, and VEGFR1 proteins in several cancer cell lines, including colon cancer cells, and RNA interference studies confirmed that these genes are regulated by Sp1, Sp3, and Sp4 transcription factors which are overexpressed in cancer cells (29, 34–38). Treatment of RKO and SW480 cancer cells with 20 and 50 μmol/L of GT-094 decreased expression of Sp1, Sp3, and Sp4 proteins (Fig. 2A) and these results were consistent with decreased expression of Sp-regulated proteins illustrated in Figure 1. However, in contrast to the effects of betulinic acid and tolfenamic acid in prostate or pancreatic cancer cells, the effects of GT-094 on downregulation of Sp1, Sp3, and Sp4 proteins were not reversed by the proteasome inhibitors MG132 or lactacystin (Fig. 2B). MG132 alone decreased expression of Sp1, Sp3, and Sp4 in RKO and SW480 cells, whereas lactacystin alone slightly decreased Sp protein levels only in SW480 cells; however, a combination of lactacystin plus GT-094 did not reverse Sp downregulation but appeared to enhance this response. The time-dependent effects of GT-094 on Sp1, Sp3, and Sp4 protein expression and levels of Sp-regulated genes were also determined in RKO (Fig. 2C) and SW480 (Fig. 2D) cells. In RKO cells, Sp1, Sp3, and Sp4 proteins decreased between 6 and 12 hours after treatment and after 12 hours, there was almost complete loss of these transcription factors. The time-dependent decrease in expression of bcl-2, survivin, c-MET, and VEGFR-R1 and induction of cleaved PARP followed a pattern similar to that observed for Sp proteins. However, cyclin D1 was significantly decreased within 6 hours, whereas decreased VEGF expression was delayed (>18 hours), suggesting that other GT-094–mediated pathways may also be involved. In SW480 cells, the time-dependent pattern of GT-094–induced downregulation of Sp1, Sp3, Sp4 and Sp-regulated gene products was similar with decreased expression observed within 6 to 12 hours and highly significant downregulation after 18 hours. The major exceptions were the rapidly decreased responses (within 6 hours) for bcl-2, VEGF and the low-molecular-weight Sp3 protein.
Ongoing studies with arsenic trioxide and other pro-oxidants that also decrease expression of Sp transcription factors suggest that mitochondria are the initial targets for these agents (40, 41). Figure 3A illustrates the effects of 50 μmol/L of GT-094 and the mitochondriotoxic carbonyl cyanide 3-chlorphenyl hydrazone (CCCP; 24 μmol/L) which depolarizes mitochondria and decreases MMP. In RKO cells treated with the fluorescent dye JC-1 and DMSO or GSH, JC-1 formed a red fluorescent aggregate which is characteristic of high MMP. However, after treatment with GT-094 or CCCP, there was a decrease in red and an increase in green fluorescence of JC-1 which is typical of low MMP, and this was accompanied by a decreased red/green fluorescence ratio. However, cotreatment of RKO cells with GT-094 and the cellular antioxidant GSH (5 mmol/L) reversed the effects of GT-094 and restored MMP. Similar responses were observed in SW480 cells (Fig. 3B) and the results were quantitated in both the cell lines (Fig. 3C and D).
Drug-induced opening of the mitochondrial pore is associated with induction of ROS, and Figure 4A shows that treatment of RKO cells with 50 μmol/L of GT-094 significantly induced ROS levels as determined by hydrolysis of the cell permeant probe to give a fluorescent product. In addition, cotreatment of these cells with thiol antioxidants (DTT or GSH) significantly decreased induction of ROS by GT-094. In parallel experiments in SW480 cells, we also observed that GT-094 induced ROS and this response was also attenuated after cotreatment with the thiol antioxidants (Fig. 4B). The role of ROS in mediating GT-094–dependent downregulation of Sp1, Sp3, and Sp4 proteins was investigated in RKO and SW480 cells. Treatment of RKO (Fig. 4C) and SW480 (Fig. 4D) cells with GT-094 decreased expression of Sp1, Sp3, and Sp4 proteins in both the cell lines and this response was attenuated in cells cotreated with GT-094 plus the thiol antioxidants. These results demonstrate that GT-094–mediated downregulation of Sp1, Sp3, and Sp4 proteins in colon cancer cells is dependent on decreased MMP and induction of ROS, and we have observed similar effects for arsenic trioxide and curcumin in bladder and pancreatic cancer cells, respectively (38, 40).
Because GT-094–induced mitochondrial disruption and induction of ROS mediates downregulation of Sp1, Sp3, and Sp4, the role of this pathway on inhibition of colon cancer cell growth and induction of apoptosis was investigated. Treatment of RKO and SW480 cells with 50 μmol/L of GT-094 for 24 hours significantly inhibited proliferation of both cell lines; however, in cells cotreated with GT-094 and the antioxidant GSH, the growth inhibitory effects of the nitro-NSAID was attenuated (Fig. 5A and B). The results also show that the role of ROS-induced growth inhibition was more dominant in RKO than in SW480 cells, suggesting that other ROS-independent pathways are involved in the inhibitory effects of GT-094 in SW480 cells. Figure 5C and D show that GT-094 enhanced TUNEL staining, indicative of apoptosis in RKO and SW480 cells, and this effect was inhibited in cells cotreated with GT-094 plus GSH. These results confirm that GT-094–dependent activation of ROS plays an important role in the observed downregulation of Sp1, Sp3, and Sp4 transcription factors, decreased cell proliferation, and induction of apoptosis in colon cancer cells.
A recent report shows that downregulation of Sp transcription by methyl 2-cyano-3,11-dioxo-18β-oleana-1,12-dien-30-oate (CDODA-Me) is due to the disruption of miR-27a:ZBTB10 interactions in colon cancer cells, resulting in decreased expression of miR-27a and induction of ZBTB10, an Sp repressor (35). Treatment of RKO and SW480 cells with GT-094 decreased miR-27a expression in both cell lines (Fig. 6A) and cotreatment with GSH reversed this effect. In parallel experiments, we observed that GT-094 induced ZBTB10 messenger RNA (mRNA) levels in RKO and SW480 cells (Fig. 6B) cells and this response was also attenuated after cotreatment with GSH. Downregulation of miR-27a was only observed using 50 μmol/L of GT-094, whereas 20 and 50 μmol/L of GT-094 induced ZBTB10 and this was particularly evident in RKO cells, suggesting that other miRNAs or other factors that play a role in regulating ZBTB10 expression may be affected by GT-094. The time-dependent effects of GT-094 (50 μmol/L) on miR-27a and ZBTB4 were also investigated (Supplementary Fig. 1). GT-094 decreased miR-27a expression in both cell lines within 6 hours, whereas ZBTB10 was induced after 6 to 12 and 12 to 18 hours in RKO and SW480 cells, respectively, indicating some cell context–dependent differences.
Nitro-NSAIDs are a new class of NSAIDs that have been developed to provide the prototypical anti-inflammatory and analgesic effects of NSAIDs but have minimal toxic gastrointestinal side-effects observed for aspirin and related drugs. The NO moiety enhances gastric mucosal repair and ulcer healing and ameliorates NSAID-induced toxicity. NO-NSAIDs have also been investigated for their anticancer activities and the results of in vitro cell culture and in vivo animal studies have been promising (17–26). These compounds typically inhibit cell growth and induce apoptosis in various cancer cell lines and this includes inhibition of β-catenin/Tcf complexes and downregulation of cyclin D1 in colon cancer cells (17). Nitro-aspirin derivatives inhibit growth of tumors in mouse xenograft experiments using HT-29 colon cancer cells and this is accompanied by decreased vascularity in the tumors and downregulation of VEGF (27). GT-094 also inhibits cancer cell and tumor growth, and in both Caco-2 and HT-29 colon cancer cells, there was no evidence for induction of apoptosis (25, 26).
Studies in this laboratory have shown that COX-2 inhibitors, such as celecoxib, decreased colon cancer cell growth and the NSAID tolfenamic acid decreased pancreatic cancer cell growth, and these effects were due, in part, to downregulation of Sp1, Sp3, and Sp4 transcription factors (30, 34). GT-094 inhibited growth of RKO and SW480 colon cancer cells (Fig. 1A), induced PARP cleavage (Fig. 1B), and TUNEL staining (Fig. 5C) consistent with induction of apoptosis. Moreover, GT-094 also decreased expression of the antiapoptotic survivin and bcl-2 proteins and this was consistent with induction of apoptosis. GT-094 decreased expression of other proteins that play a role in cell growth (cyclin D1, c-Met, and EGFR) and angiogenesis (VEGF and VEGFR1; Fig. 1C and D) and this was consistent with previous studies on NO-NSAIDs which report downregulation of cyclin D1 and VEGF (24, 27). Previous studies in this laboratory have demonstrated by RNA interference that knockdown of Sp1, Sp3, and Sp4 individually or in combination decreases expression of the prosurvival, growth promoting, and angiogenic proteins (29, 31, 32, 37–41). Results shown in Figure 1 suggest that an underlying mechanism for these responses in RKO and SW480 cells may be related to downregulation of Sp1, Sp3, and Sp4 proteins and this was observed in these cells treated with GT-094 (Fig. 2A). The time-dependent decrease in expression of Sp1, Sp3, Sp4, and Sp-regulated genes was also determined in RKO and SW480 cells treated with GT-094 (Fig. 2C and D). Although the rate of decrease in expression of these proteins was similar in each of the cell lines, there were also notable exceptions, particularly for some putative Sp-regulated genes which have previously been characterized by Sp1, Sp3, and Sp4 knockdown in RNA interference studies (29, 31, 32, 37–41). For example, expression of cyclin D1 (RKO cells) and bcl-2 (SW480 cells) was rapidly decreased (<6 hours) prior to Sp transcription factors or most other Sp-regulated genes, suggesting that GT-094 also induced other pathways that repress genes independent of Sp downregulation.
At least 2 different pathways have been linked to drug-dependent downregulation of Sp transcription factors, namely via activation of proteasomes (29, 34, 36) or through downregulation of miR-27a and the subsequent induction of the Sp repressor ZBTB10 (35, 36). GT-094–dependent downregulation of Sp1, Sp3, and Sp4 was not reversed by proteasome inhibitors (Fig. 2B), whereas the NSAID tolfenamic acid and the triterpenoid betulinic acid induce proteasome-dependent degradation of Sp transcription factors in pancreatic and prostate cancer cells, respectively (34, 36). In contrast, CDODA-Me–dependent downregulation of Sp1, Sp3, and Sp4 in colon cancer cells was proteasome independent as observed in this study, and the effects of CDODA-Me were due to decreased miR-27a and the subsequent induction of ZBTB10, an miR-27a–regulated mRNA (35). Moreover, in SW480 and RKO cells transfected with antisense miR-27a or ZBTB10 expression plasmid, there is also a decrease in Sp1, Sp3, Sp4, and Sp-regulated genes (35). This pathway was also relevant for GT-094 which induced ZBTB10 and decreased miR-27a in colon cancer cells (Fig. 6 and Supplementary Fig. 1). ZBTB10 is a member of the POK family of transcriptional repressors (42) and was first identified as an inhibitor of gastrin gene expression (43). ZBTB10 binds to the GC-rich gastrin gene promoter and inhibits Sp1-dependent transactivation and presumably inhibits expression of Sp1, Sp3, Sp4, and Sp-regulated genes through similar interactions with their GC-rich promoters.
In ongoing studies with arsenic trioxide (40) and other pro-oxidants, including curcumin and CDDO-Me, in pancreatic cancer cells (38, 41), we have observed that these compounds decreased MMP and increased ROS and ROS-induced downregulation of Sp and Sp-regulated gene products. Results illustrated in Figures 3 and 4 indicate that GT-094 decreased MMP and induced ROS in RKO and SW480 cells and this was reversed in cells cotreated with the thiol antioxidant, GSH. The effects of GT-094 on MMP and ROS were similar to the induction of ROS by NO-ASA in colon cancer cell lines (18). However, induction of ROS by GT-094 in this study was also related to modulation of the miR-27a:ZBTB10-Sp1/Sp3/Sp4 axis because cotreatment with GSH attenuated GT-094–mediated downregulation of miR-27a and induction of ZBTB10 (Fig. 6) decreased expression of Sp1, Sp3, and Sp4 (Fig. 4C and D), increased TUNEL staining (Fig. 5C and D), and decreased growth (Fig. 5A and B). It was also apparent from the cotreatment studies (GT-094 + GSH) that there were cell context–dependent differences in the inhibitory effects of GSH. For example, GSH almost totally reversed GT-094–mediated inhibition of RKO cell proliferation but only partially reversed these effects in SW480 cells (Fig. 5A and B), suggesting that other GT-094–induced growth inhibitory responses were important in the latter cell line. In RKO cells, 20 μmol/L of GT-094 induced ZBTB10 mRNA but did not downregulate miR-27a (Fig. 6A and B), suggesting that other miRs or other factors contributed to expression of this gene and these are currently being investigated.
In summary, this study shows that like CDODA-Me, GT-094 decreases miR-27a and induces ZBTB10 expression in colon cancer cells and the subsequent downregulation of Sp1, Sp3, Sp4, and Sp-regulated proteins contributes to the anticancer activities of this compound. Moreover, GT-094 disruption of mitochondria and induction of ROS are critical elements for the subsequent ROS-dependent downstream disruption of the miR-27a:ZBTB10-Sp transcription factor axis (Fig. 6C). In addition, this study and a previous report in pancreatic cancer cells demonstrate that ROS suppresses miR-27a, and we have also observed similar ROS-dependent effects on the miR-27a promoter. We are currently investigating the specific cis-elements and trans-acting factors responsible for ROS-miR-27a interactions. These results demonstrate a hitherto unknown mechanism of action for GT-094 and other NO-NSAIDs in cancer cells (data not shown), and current studies are focused on the role of Sp transcription factors as targets for NO-NSAIDs and NSAIDs in cancer cells and tumors.
This research was supported by the National Institutes of Health [CA136571 (S. Safe) and CA102590 (G.R.J. Thatcher)] and Texas AgriLife Research.
The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. This article must therefore be hereby marked advertisement in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.
Disclosure of Potential Conflicts of Interest
No potential conflicts of interest were disclosed.
Note: Supplementary data for this article are available at Molecular Cancer Research Online (http://mcr.aacrjournals.org/).
- Received August 9, 2010.
- Revision received November 24, 2010.
- Accepted December 7, 2010.
- ©2010 American Association for Cancer Research.