Molecular Cancer Research Targeting the PI3-Kinase Pathway in Cancer Tumor Immunology: New Perspectives
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Cancer Research Clinical Cancer Research
Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention Molecular Cancer Therapeutics
Molecular Cancer Research Cancer Prevention Research
Cancer Prevention Journals Portal Cancer Reviews Online
Annual Meeting Education Book Meeting Abstracts Online

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Shin, V. Y.
Right arrow Articles by Cho, C.-H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Shin, V. Y.
Right arrow Articles by Cho, C.-H.
Molecular Cancer Research 3:607-615 (2005)
© 2005 American Association for Cancer Research


Angiogenesis, Metastasis, and the Cellular Microenvironment

Nicotine Induces Cyclooxygenase-2 and Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Receptor-2 in Association with Tumor-Associated Invasion and Angiogenesis in Gastric Cancer

Vivian Y. Shin1, William K.K. Wu1, Kent-Man Chu2, Helen P.S. Wong1, Emily K.Y. Lam1, Emily K.K. Tai1, Marcel W.L. Koo1 and Chi-Hin Cho1,3

Departments of 1 Pharmacology and 2 Surgery and 3 Research Centre of Infection and Immunology, Faculty of Medicine, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, Hong Kong

Requests for reprints: Chi-Hin Cho, Department of Pharmacology, Faculty of Medicine, The University of Hong Kong, 21 Sassoon Road, Hong Kong, Hong Kong. Phone: 852-2819-9252; Fax: 852-2817-0859. E-mail: chcho{at}hkusua.hku.hk


    Abstract
 Top
 Notes
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Results
 Discussion
 Materials and Methods
 References
 
Blockade of angiogenesis is a promising strategy to suppress tumor growth, invasion, and metastasis. Vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), which binds to tyrosine kinase receptors [VEGF receptors (VEGFR) 1 and 2], is the mediator of angiogenesis and mitogen for endothelial cells. Cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2) plays an important role in the promoting action of nicotine on gastric cancer growth. However, the action of nicotine and the relationship between COX-2 and VEGF/VEGFR system in tumorigenesis remain undefined. In this study, the effects of nicotine in tumor angiogenesis, invasiveness, and metastasis were studied with sponge implantation and Matrigel membrane models. Nicotine (200 µg/mL) stimulated gastric cancer cell proliferation, which was blocked by SC-236 (a highly selective COX-2 inhibitor) and CBO-P11 (a VEGFR inhibitor). This was associated with decreased VEGF levels as well as VEGFR-2 but not VEGFR-1 expression. Topical injection of nicotine enhanced tumor-associated vascularization, with a concomitant increase in VEGF levels in sponge implants. Again, application of SC-236 (2 mg/kg) and CBO-P11 (0.4 mg/kg) partially attenuated vascularization by ~30%. Furthermore, nicotine enhanced tumor cell invasion through the Matrigel membrane by 4-fold and promoted migration of human umbilical vein endothelial cells in a cocultured system with gastric cancer cells. The activity of matrix metalloproteinases 2 and 9 and protein expressions of plasminogen activators (urokinase-type plasminogen activator and its receptor), which are the indicators of invasion and migration processes, were increased by nicotine but blocked by COX-2 and VEGFR inhibitors. Taken together, our results reveal that the promoting action of nicotine on angiogenesis, tumor invasion, and metastasis is COX-2/VEGF/VEGFR dependent.


    Introduction
 Top
 Notes
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Results
 Discussion
 Materials and Methods
 References
 
Cigarette smoke has been well documented to be closely related to the development of gastric cancer (1, 2). However, the exact mechanism for the carcinogenic action of cigarette smoke is still largely unknown. Nicotine is recognized to be the major psychoactive compound in cigarette smoke and has been suggested to play a role in carcinogenesis (3). Tumor cell proliferation, angiogenesis, and local and distant cell migration are hallmarks of solid tumors. Our recent studies show that nicotine induces proliferation of human adenocarcinoma cells via a cyclooxygenase (COX)/lipoxygenase–dependent pathway to metabolize fatty acids into eicosanoids (4, 5). The effects of COX-2 inhibitors on treatment and chemoprevention of gastric cancer have been widely reported (6, 7). However, the involvement of COX-2 in tumor invasion and metastasis receives little attention.

Angiogenesis is the growth of new capillaries occurring in many physiologic and pathologic events. Development of tumors depends on the supply of nutrients and oxygen from newly formed blood vessels. The process of angiogenesis involves endothelial cell activation, degradation of extracellular matrix (ECM), and basal membrane. This is followed by endothelial cell migration, proliferation, and subsequent differentiation into functional blood vessels (8). Tumor-induced angiogenesis is mediated through the action of some soluble mediators, for instance, vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), fibroblast growth factor, angiopoietin-2, and matrix metalloproteinases (MMP; ref. 9). Tumor cells can trigger the release of various proangiogenic factors, such as VEGF and platelet-derived growth factor, where the former initiates the angiogenic process and the latter maintains blood vessels (10).

VEGF mediates its biological effects on the vascular endothelium mainly through the two tyrosine kinase receptors [i.e., VEGF receptor (VEGFR) 1 (Flt-1) and VEGFR-2 (Flk-1; ref. 11)]. The interaction between VEGF-1 and VEGFR-2 is important for angiogenesis during tumor formation. The major action of VEGF is acting through VEGFR-2 to exert mitogenic and motogenic effects (12). VEGFR-2 tyrosine kinase inhibitors (PTK787 and ZK2284) significantly reduce the kinase activity and thereby inhibit angiogenesis and tumorigenesis in tumor models (13). Other studies have shown that treatment with antibodies against VEGF or VEGFR can suppress angiogenesis (14, 15).

Cancer metastasis proceeds in various steps, such as adhesion to the ECM followed by proteolytic degradation and ultimately migration (16). MMPs are involved in ECM degradation (17) and the activity is associated with invasiveness and metastasis in tumor cells (18). MMP-2 and MMP-9 are the two major enzymes that can selectively degrade type IV collagen and facilitate tumor invasion and metastasis in various experimental models, including gastric, colon, and breast cancers (19-21). Administration of nicotine increased the severity of choroidal neovascularization and also reversed the VEGF-induced suppression of MMP-2 activity in mice (22), showing that MMP could play a role in the angiogenesis induced by nicotine. Indeed, suppression of MMP by different inhibitors markedly reduced tumor cell invasiveness and metastasis (23). However, the direct action of nicotine on angiogenesis and invasion of cancer cells remains unknown, although recent studies show that nicotine can regulate endothelial cell growth (24-26).

In the present study, a sponge implantation model and a cocultured system of vascular endothelial cells and gastric cancer cells were used to study the direct action of nicotine on angiogenesis. A Matrigel invasion chamber was used to investigate the invasiveness of nicotine. The roles of COX-2 and the VEGF/VEGFR system on the actions of nicotine on these pathologic processes were also investigated.


    Results
 Top
 Notes
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Results
 Discussion
 Materials and Methods
 References
 
Effect of Nicotine on COX-2 and VEGFR in Gastric Cancer Cell Proliferation
As shown in our previous findings, nicotine (10-200 µg/mL) dose-dependently stimulated gastric cancer cell proliferation through up-regulation of COX-2 expression and increased the release of prostaglandin E2 and VEGF (4). Both VEGFR-1 and VEGFR-2 were expressed in the unstimulated AGS cells; however, only VEGFR-2 was significantly up-regulated in the nicotine-stimulated cells (Fig. 1A), which was suppressed by SC-236 (selective COX-2 inhibitor) or CBO-P11 (VEGFR inhibitor) pretreatment. These data reveal that both COX-2 and VEGFR-2 are imperative in the action of nicotine on gastric cancer growth.



View larger version (24K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIGURE 1. A. Western blot analysis of the effect of nicotine on VEGFR-1 and VEGFR-2 protein expressions in AGS cells. Effects of selective COX-2 inhibitor (SC-236, 24.8 µmol/L) or VEGFR inhibitor (CBO-P11, 10 µmol/L) on [3H]thymidine incorporation (B) and VEGF levels (C) in the nicotine-mediated gastric cancer cells (AGS). Cells were pretreated with SC-236 or CBO-P11 for 60 minutes before nicotine incubation for 5 hours and the experiments were done as described in Materials and Methods. Columns, mean of two triplicate experiments; bars, SE. *, P < 0.05 versus the control group; {dagger}, P < 0.05; {dagger}{dagger}, P < 0.01 versus the respective nicotine-treated groups.

 
To further substantiate the role of COX-2 and VEGFR in the nicotine-induced gastric cancer cell proliferation, gastric cancer cells were preincubated with SC-236 (24.8 µmol/L) or CBO-P11 (10 µmol/L) and it was found that they both markedly reduced the stimulatory action of nicotine on cell proliferation by 50% and 37%, respectively (Fig. 1B). In addition, combination of SC-236 and CBO-P11 further suppressed cell proliferation by 70% of the control without the blockers. Nicotine not only exerted mitogenic effect but also promoted the release of proangiogenic factor VEGF by 2.5-fold. This effect was significantly reversed by the COX-2 and VEGFR inhibitors. Combination of SC-236 and CBO-P11 reduced the VEGF content further to the basal control level (Fig. 1C).

Involvement of COX-2 and VEGFR in Nicotine-Induced Angiogenesis in a Sponge Implant Model
To examine the direct effect of nicotine on angiogenesis, a sponge implantation model was adopted to study the role of COX-2 and VEGFR in tumor-associated angiogenesis. A schematic diagram of nicotine treatment and inhibitors of COX-2 and VEGFR in the sponge implantation model is shown in Fig. 2A. The degree of angiogenesis was determined by measuring the hemoglobin content in the sponge implant after 1 month (Fig. 2B). The basic fibroblast growth factor was used as a positive control, which increased the hemoglobin content by ~70% when compared with the control, whereas topical injection of nicotine (20 µg) significantly enhanced by 26% (Fig. 2C). Administration of the inhibitors for COX-2 (SC-236, 2 mg/kg) and VEGFR (CBO-P11, 0.4 mg/kg) reversed the stimulatory action of nicotine to the control level. Hence, it is implicated that COX-2 and VEGFR are involved in the angiogenesis induced by nicotine.



View larger version (21K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIGURE 2. A. Schematic diagram showing nicotine treatment in the sponge implantation model for 1 month. Basic fibroblast growth factor (bFGF; 0.2 ng), COX-2 inhibitor (SC-236, 2 mg/kg), and VEGFR inhibitor (0.4 mg/kg) were injected topically into the sponge three times weekly throughout the experiment. B. Subcutaneous sponge implantation in the dorsal area of nude mice (dotted circle). C. Effects of selective COX-2 inhibitor (SC-236, 2 mg/kg) or VEGFR inhibitor (CBO-P11, 0.4 mg/kg) on tumor-associated angiogenesis in the sponge implants. The degree of angiogenesis was determined by measuring the hemoglobin content of the sponge implant as described in Materials and Methods. D. Effects of selective COX-2 or VEGFR inhibitor on VEGF levels in the sponge implants. Supernatants from the sponge implants after centrifugation were subjected to VEGF assay. Columns, mean of 10 mice in each group; bars, SE. *, P < 0.05 versus the control group; {dagger}, P < 0.05 versus the respective nicotine-treated groups.

 
Levels of VEGF in Sponge Implants
The immunoreactive VEGF protein in the sponge implant was measured with an ELISA kit. Levels of VEGF were significantly increased in both basic fibroblast growth factor– and nicotine-treated groups by 80% and 30%, respectively, when compared with the control (Fig. 2D). Topical injections of SC-236 or CBO-P11 markedly repressed the VEGF content back to the basal level. These results suggest that the induction of VEGF by nicotine is COX-2 and VEGFR dependent and involved in the promotion of angiogenesis in the sponge model.

Effects of COX-2 and VEGFR on Tumor Invasiveness Induced by Nicotine
Invasion is another important process that leads to gastric cancer promotion. To examine the effect of nicotine on tumor invasion, we determined the effect of COX-2 and VEGFR inhibitors on the number of migrated cells invaded through the Matrigel membrane. The invasive ability of tumor cells was increased by nicotine, and the number of invading cells was increased by 4-fold when compared with the control group (Fig. 3). SC-236 and CBO-P11 partially but significantly inhibited the migration of gastric cancer cells through the Matrigel membrane. It is likely that nicotine-induced gastric cancer cell invasion is also COX-2 and VEGFR dependent.



View larger version (20K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIGURE 3. Effects of selective COX-2 inhibitor (SC-236, 24.8 µmol/L) or VEGFR inhibitor (CBO-P11, 10 µmol/L) on the invasion ability of nicotine-stimulated gastric cancer cells (AGS). The experiments were done as described in Materials and Methods. Numbers of AGS cells migrated through the Matrigel layer to the lower surface of the filter were counted under light microscope (x200). Columns, mean of two triplicate experiments; bars, SE. *, P < 0.05 versus the control group; {dagger}, P < 0.05 versus the respective nicotine-treated groups.

 
Effect of Nicotine on Endothelial Cells (Human Umbilical Vein Endothelial Cells) Migration Induced by AGS Cells
To validate the roles of COX-2 and VEGFR in the action of nicotine on endothelial cell migration, human umbilical vein endothelial cells were cocultured with tumor cells in the presence of nicotine with or without the respective inhibitor. Nicotine (200 µg/mL) significantly stimulated endothelial cell migration when cocultured with AGS cells in comparison with the control group. Pretreatment with SC-236 or CBO-P11 before nicotine completely inhibited the stimulatory action of nicotine on endothelial cell migration (Fig. 4). Therefore, it is hypothesized that nicotine could stimulate the release of these mediators to promote endothelial cell migration. However, the mechanism of how and from where nicotine induce COX-2 and VEGF expressions remains unknown.



View larger version (21K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIGURE 4. Effects of selective COX-2 inhibitor (SC-236, 24.8 µmol/L) or VEGFR inhibitor (CBO-P11, 10 µmol/L) on migration of cocultured human umbilical vein endothelial cells (HUVECs). The experiments were done as described in Materials and Methods. Cell movement was evaluated by the number of cells that had migrated to the conditioned medium of tumor cells with different treatments and counted under light microscope (x200). Columns, mean of two triplicate experiments; bars, SE. **, P < 0.01 versus the control group; {dagger}, P < 0.05 versus the respective nicotine-treated groups.

 
Effect of Nicotine on MMP-2 and MMP-9 in AGS Cells
In accordance with the stimulatory action of nicotine on the invasiveness of gastric cancer cells, the production of the two major MMPs (MMP-2 and MMP-9) was also measured. Activation of MMPs can selectively degrade type IV collagen, which attributes to tumor invasion and metastasis. Nicotine significantly increased MMP-2 (72 kDa) and MMP-9 (92 kDa) activities and protein expressions (Figs. 5 and 6). Nicotine increased the activities of MMP-2 (Fig. 5) and MMP-9 (Fig. 6) by 70% and 40%, respectively, when compared with the control group. On the other hand, pretreatment with SC-236 or CBO-P11 markedly reduced the activities and protein expressions of MMP-2 and MMP-9, suggesting that the action of nicotine on these proteins was also COX-2 and VEGFR dependent.



View larger version (36K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIGURE 5. Effects of selective COX-2 inhibitor (SC-236, 24.8 µmol/L) or VEGFR inhibitor (CBO-P11, 10 µmol/L) on MMP-2 expression and activity. A. Western blot analysis of MMP-2 protein. B. Zymography of MMP-2 activity. The experiments were done as described in Materials and Methods. Columns, mean of two triplicate experiments; bars, SE. **, P < 0.01 versus the control group; {dagger}, P < 0.05; {dagger}{dagger}, P < 0.01 versus the respective nicotine-treated groups.

 


View larger version (33K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIGURE 6. Effects of selective COX-2 inhibitor (SC-236, 24.8 µmol/L) or VEGFR inhibitor (CBO-P11, 10 µmol/L) on MMP-9 expression and activity. A. Western blot analysis of MMP-9 protein. B. Zymography of MMP-9 activity. The experiments were done as described in Materials and Methods. Columns, mean of two triplicate experiments; bars, SE. **, P < 0.01 versus the control group; {dagger}, P < 0.05; {dagger}{dagger}, P < 0.01 versus the respective nicotine-treated groups.

 
Effect of Nicotine on Urokinase-Type Plasminogen Activator and Its Receptor and Plasminogen Activator Inhibitor-1 in AGS Cells
Plasminogen activators are enzymes that degrade proteins in tissue basement membranes and ECM, which is implicated in neovascularization, invasion, and metastasis of solid tumors. Nicotine up-regulated the urokinase-type plasminogen activator (uPA) and its receptor (uPAR) expression; however, it did not affect the expression of plasminogen activator inhibitor-1 (Fig. 7). Treatment with SC-236 or CBO-P11 reversed the stimulatory action of nicotine on uPA and uPAR expression back to the basal level. These results reveal that COX-2 and VEGFR are involved in the excitatory action of nicotine on uPA system leading to the increase of invasion and angiogenesis during tumorigenesis of gastric cancers.



View larger version (51K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIGURE 7. Western blot analysis of the effects of selective COX-2 inhibitor (SC-236, 24.8 µmol/L) or VEGFR inhibitor (CBO-P11, 10 µmol/L) on uPA, uPAR, and plasminogen activator inhibitor-1 (PAI-1) protein expressions. The experiments were done as described in Materials and Methods. Western blot data were obtained in three independent experiments.

 

    Discussion
 Top
 Notes
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Results
 Discussion
 Materials and Methods
 References
 
Ample evidences both in vivo and in vitro have reported that COX-2 is closely associated with carcinogenesis. Both selective and nonselective COX inhibitors were shown to effectively abrogate the progression of tumors in animal models (6, 27). Nicotine has been shown to induce hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal activity, which is related to prostaglandin synthesis (28, 29). Up-regulation of COX-2 mRNA expression was observed after exposure to nicotine in human gingival fibroblasts and rat microglial cells (30, 31). All these provide evidence that nicotine, the active component in cigarette smoke, could play a role in the pathogenesis of smoking-associated disease, which is likely to be COX/prostaglandin dependent. In the present study, selective COX-2 inhibitor (SC-236) markedly reduced nicotine-induced gastric cancer cell proliferation and VEGF levels (Fig. 1B). Indeed, the antitumor action of COX-2 inhibitors is suggested to be due to its induction of apoptosis and suppression of cell proliferation. However, experimental data reporting the ability of COX-2 and its relationship with VEGF on angiogenesis and metastasis, the two important processes in tumor development, are limited.

Nicotine has been shown to increase the vascularity of choroidal neovascularization through the induction of VEGF (22). Overexpression of VEGFR is found in angiogenic blood vessels in various human cancers (32, 33). Recent study shows that VEGFR plays a significant role in the development of gastric cancer and also in lymph node metastasis (34). To ascertain the role of COX-2 and VEGFR in the action of nicotine on tumor-associated angiogenesis, we adopted a sponge implantation model. In this model, nicotine increased tumor-associated angiogenesis by ~26% when compared with the control group (Fig. 2C). Topical injection of the inhibitors of COX-2 and VEGFR significantly reduced the hemoglobin content in sponge implants, implicating that the promoting action of nicotine on angiogenesis is COX-2 and VEGFR dependent. In addition, nicotine also stimulated the release of VEGF from adjacent tissues into sponge implants, which was again blocked by inhibitors of COX-2 and VEGFR (Fig. 2D). Both VEGFR-1 and VEGFR-2 proteins were expressed in gastric cancer cells, but only VEGFR-2 expression was significantly up-regulated by nicotine and blocked by SC-236 and CBO-P11 (Fig. 1B). Our previous study also showed that similar concentration of nicotine stimulated the secretion of VEGF from gastric cancer cells (4). It is likely that the mitogenic effect induced by nicotine depends on the activation of COX-2 with the release of VEGF that binds to the VEGFR, particularly VEGFR-2, in gastric cancer cells. It was interesting to note that blocking the VEGFR by CBO-P11 abrogated the stimulatory action of nicotine on VEGF level in the sponge (Fig. 2D) as well as in gastric cancer cells (Fig. 1C). These findings suggest that VEGFRs could have a positive feedback action on the release of VEGF from normal and cancer cells. Corresponding study also indicated that injection of VEGFR inhibitor reduced the release VEGF from tumors in mice (35). Furthermore, the intimate relation between VEGF and COX-2/prostaglandin was also shown in other gastric cell line (MKN-28 cells) and gallbladder carcinoma (36, 37).

To further understand the action of nicotine in tumor angiogenesis and invasion, the Matrigel invasion chamber was used to study the invasiveness of AGS cells stimulated by nicotine. Results showed that nicotine stimulated the invasive ability of gastric cancer cells, and inhibitors of COX-2 and VEGFR markedly prevented cancer cell migration from the upper chamber to the lower chamber (Fig. 3). Furthermore, nicotine was able to promote angiogenesis through endothelial cell migration in the coculture system of human umbilical vein endothelial cells and tumor cells (AGS cells). This was again attenuated by SC-236 and CBO-P11 (Fig. 4). These results suggest that COX-2 produced by AGS cells could stimulate the release of some growth factors, which is likely to be VEGF to enhance the migration of endothelial cells. In concord with the current finding, earlier study also reported that COX-2-expressing tumor cells stimulated the mobility of cocultured endothelial cells with the induction of VEGF (38). Therefore, it is suggested that the stimulatory action of nicotine on invasiveness (migration of cancer cells) and angiogenesis (mobility of endothelial cells) are dependent on COX-2 activity and the angiogenic action of VEGF. This phenomenon is in accord with other study that inhibitor of COX-2 markedly reduces Helicobacter pylori–promoted gastric cancer cell invasion, concomitant with down-regulation of MMP-9 and VEGF protein expressions (39).

Because COX-2 has been localized in tumor cells and adjacent stroma cells, the release of prostaglandins from COX-2 may act on the tumor cells or the neighboring stroma cells to facilitate the development of tumors (40, 41). To further enhance the invasiveness of cancer cells, degradation of ECM would facilitate the growth and metastasis of tumors. MMP-2, MMP-9, and uPAs (uPA and uPAR) are important proteolytic enzymes for the degradation of ECM. MMP-2 and MMP-9 activities as well as their protein expressions were markedly increased in the nicotine-treated groups (Figs. 5 and 6). Furthermore, expressions of uPA and uPAR were strongly induced by nicotine. In contrast, the induction of these proteolytic enzymes was suppressed by SC-236 and CBO-P11 (Figs. 5-7). Phorbol 12-myristate 13-acetate, a tumor-promoting agent, also induces tumor cell invasion through the induction of MMP-9 in AGS cells (19). There have been several reports showing that other MMPs also facilitate tumor invasion and metastasis and are related to the initial step of gastric cancer invasion (42, 43). Elevated levels of uPA and plasminogen activator inhibitor-1 in cancer tissues are independent prognostic indicators of poor survival in gastric cancer patients (44). uPA is associated with tumor cells or malignant transformation, whereas uPAR plays a pivotal role in generating the proteolytic cascade to unleash MMPs for basement membrane remodeling by tumor cells and endothelial cells (45).

Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs have been reported to reduce the risk of various cancers by inhibiting COX activity. This can reduce tumor cell proliferation and invasion. It has also been shown that COX-2 inhibitor significantly reduced tumor-induced MMP-2 and MMP-9 expression in cancer models (21, 46). To elucidate the possible link between COX-2/VEGFR and the proteolytic enzymes, cells were treated with SC-236 or CBO-P11 to examine the effects on MMP-2 and MMP-9 as well as uPA and uPAR on gastric cancer cells. It was found that inhibitors of COX-2 and VEGFR significantly suppressed the activation of nicotine on MMP-2 and MMP-9 activities and also uPA and uPAR expression (Figs. 5-7). These data support the notion that the action of nicotine on cancer cell invasion and tumor angiogenesis is via the activation of MMPs and uPAs, which are COX-2 and VEGFR dependent. It has been reported that VEGF can increase the binding of uPA to uPAR and enhance the proteolytic activity of invading cells by stimulating the release of MMPs (47). However, the relationship between uPA and MMP activation in the signaling pathway stimulated by nicotine to promote invasion and angiogenesis of gastric cancer cells needs further study.

In conclusion, nicotine can stimulate COX-2 expression to trigger tumor cell invasion and angiogenesis through activation of VEGF, which subsequently modulates the MMP activity and expression of plasminogen activators. Inhibitors of COX-2 and VEGFR suppress this biological pathway resulting in the inhibition of tumor cell invasion and angiogenesis (Fig. 8). Hence, it is likely that agent that can block the COX-2/VEGF pathway is effective in the suppression of tumor invasion and angiogenesis in gastric cancer.



View larger version (24K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIGURE 8. Proposed mechanisms of the regulatory roles of COX-2 and VEGFR in tumor cell invasion and metastasis. PGE2, prostaglandin E2.

 

    Materials and Methods
 Top
 Notes
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Results
 Discussion
 Materials and Methods
 References
 
Reagents and Drugs
SC-236 (4-[5-(4-chlorophenyl)-3-(trifluoromethyl)-1H-pyrazol-1-yl] benzenesulfonamide) was purchased from Pharmacia (Peapack, NJ). Antibodies specific to COX-2, VEGFR-1, and VEGFR-2 were from Santa Cruz Biotechnology (Santa Cruz, CA). CBO-P11 (VEGFR inhibitor) was purchased from Calbiochem (Darmstadt, Germany). Nicotine was from Sigma Chemical Co. (St. Louis, MO). VEGF enzyme immunoassay kit was obtained from Oncogene (Darmstadt, Germany). Other chemicals and reagents were from commercial sources unless otherwise specified.

Animals
This study was approved by the Committee on the Use of Live Animals in Teaching and Research at the University of Hong Kong. Athymic BALB/c nu/nu mice supplied by Charles River Laboratories (Wilmington, MA), 4 to 6 weeks old, were fed with a standard laboratory diet (Ralston Purina Co., Chicago, IL) ad libitum. They were housed in individually ventilated cages with isolated ventilation in a holding room controlled at 22 ± 1°C and 65% to 70% relative humidity with a 12:12-hour light/dark cycle.

Sponge Implantation Model of Angiogenesis
The sponge implantation model was developed to study angiogenesis in vivo as described previously with some modifications (48). Sponge discs (diameter, 0.7 cm; thickness, 0.2 cm) were prepared from the polyester polyurethane foam. The discs were disinfected by soaking in 70% ethanol for 3 hours and then rinsed in distilled water and finally sterilized with UV irradiation overnight. Sterilized sponge disc was implanted subcutaneously in the dorsal area of nude mice (Fig. 2B). After implantation, they were then divided into different groups: (a) basic fibroblast growth factor (0.2 ng) positive control; (b) control; (c) nicotine (20 µg); (d) nicotine (20 µg) + SC-236 (2 mg/kg); and (e) nicotine (20 µg) + CBO-P11 (0.4 mg/kg). Mice were sacrificed after 1 month and the sponges were taken out for measuring hemoglobin content and VEGF levels.

Cell Culture and Drug Treatment
Human gastric adenocarcinoma cells (AGS) were purchased from American Type Culture Collection (Manassas, VA) (CRL-1739). Cells were cultured in RPMI 1640 (Life Technologies, Grand Island, NY) containing 10% fetal bovine serum (Life Technologies), 100 units/mL penicillin G, and 100 µg/mL streptomycin. Human umbilical vein endothelial cells were purchased from American Type Culture Collection (CRL-1730). Cells were maintained in Kaighn's F12K medium (F12K) containing 20% fetal bovine serum, 1% antibiotic-antimycotic, and 75 µg/mL endothelial cell growth supplement. Cells were maintained at 37°C, 95% humidity, and 5% CO2.

AGS cells were plated at a density of 8 x 104 per well in 24-well plates. At confluence, nicotine (200 µg/mL) was incubated with cells for 5 hours to study the mitogenic effect of nicotine on gastric cancer cells. To examine the effects of various inhibitors, cells were pretreated with or without SC-236 (24.8 µmol/L for 60 minutes) or CBO-P11 (10 µmol/L for 60 minutes) before nicotine treatment (200 µg/mL for 5 hours). Control cells were allowed to grow in the absence of SC-236 or any inhibitors for the same period of time as the treated cells. Experiments were done in duplicate and repeated three times. The concentration of nicotine used in the present study mimicked the daily intakes of cigarettes in heavy smokers (>30 cigarettes per day; ref. 49).

[3H]Thymidine Incorporation Assay
A modified [3H]thymidine incorporation assay was used to determine the amount of DNA synthesis (50). After confluent, cells were incubated in the presence or absence of SC-236 (24.8 µmol/L for 60 minutes) or CBO-P11 (10 µmol/L for 60 minutes) before nicotine (200 µg/mL for 5 hours) and then incubated with 0.5 µCi/mL [3H]thymidine (Amersham Corp., Arlington Heights, IL) for 5 hours. It was then washed with ice-cold 0.15 mol/L NaCl followed by 10% trichloroacetic acid and incubated for 15 minutes at room temperature. After several washing, 1% SDS was added and incubated for another 15 minutes at 37°C. Finally, hydrophilic scintillation fluid was added into the vial and the amount of DNA synthesized was measured using a liquid scintillation counter coupled to a ß-counter (Beckman Instruments, Fullerton, CA).

Immunoblotting
Whole-cell lysates were prepared as described previously (51). Briefly, cells were lysed in 500 µL radioimmunoprecipitation assay buffer and proteinase inhibitors. Protein was quantified with the use of protein assay kit (Bio-Rad Laboratories, Hercules, CA). Equal amounts of protein (80 µg/lane) were resolved with SDS-PAGE and transferred to Hybond C nitrocellulose membranes (Amersham). The membranes were probed with COX-2, VEGFR-1, or VEGFR-2 antibodies overnight at 4°C and incubated for 1 hour with secondary peroxidase-conjugated antibody. The membranes were developed with an enhanced chemiluminescence system (Amersham) and exposed to an X-ray film (Fuji Photo Film Co. Ltd., Tokyo, Japan). Quantitation was carried out with a video densitometer (ScanMaker III, Microtek).

Hemoglobin Assay
Neovascularization is determined in terms of hemoglobin concentration. Hemoglobin content was assessed with the use of Drabkin's reagent as described previously (52). Sponges were homogenized in 50 µL ultrapure water using a pestle and incubated with 0.5 mL Drabkin's reagent for 15 minutes at room temperature. Homogenates were then centrifuged at 1,000 x g for 10 minutes and the absorbance of the supernatant was measured at 540 nm. The total hemoglobin concentration was expressed as the absorption divided by the weight of the sponge.

Invasion Assay
The invasive ability of cells was assessed by using BioCoat Matrigel Invasion Chamber as described previously (53). Briefly, tumor cells were treated with COX-2 and VEGF inhibitors. After 5 hours of drug treatment, cells were trypsinized and suspended in phenol red–free culture medium in the absence of serum at a concentration of 1 x 106/mL in the upper chamber. The lower chamber was filled with culture medium supplemented with 10% FCS as the chemoattractant (Fig. 3). After 24 hours, invaded cells that had passed through the Matrigel and adhered to the lower surface of the membrane were fixed with methanol, stained with 0.1% crystal violet, and counted under a light microscope (x200).

Migration of Endothelial Cells In vitro
In vitro indirect coculture assay was done to measure the migration of endothelial cells during angiogenesis through Falcon cell culture insert with 0.4-µm pore size PET membrane (54). Gastric cancer cells were grown to confluence in the lower chamber and incubated with nicotine in the absence or presence of inhibitors of COX-2 and VEGFR for 5 hours. Human umbilical vein endothelial cells were then suspended in serum-free medium in the upper chamber. The cocultured cells were incubated for another 5 hours and the number of migrated endothelial cells was counted under a light microscope (x200).

Gelatin Zymography
Gelatinolytic enzymes in AGS cells were analyzed by zymography as described previously (55). In brief, cells were incubated with nicotine in the absence or presence of SC-236 pretreatment. The supernatants were collected after 5 hours and centrifuged at 17,689 x g for 10 minutes. The supernatants were resolved in SDS sample buffer without mercaptoethanol and electrophoresed in 7.5% polyacrylamide gel containing 1 mg/mL gelatin. The gel was washed with 2.5% Triton X-100 to remove SDS and incubated with developing buffer (containing 50 mmol/L Tris-HCl, 0.2 mol/L NaCl, 5 mmol/L CaCl2, 0.02% Brij-35) overnight at 37°C. To visualize the presence of gelatinolytic bands, gels were stained with Coomassie blue (R-250) and destained with Coomassie blue destaining solution (R-250) until all bands of lysis became clear.

VEGF Assay
Supernatants were collected from the sponge implants and the levels of VEGF were analyzed using a VEGF ELISA kit (Oncogene Research Products, EMD Biosciences, Inc., Darmstadt, Germany). This detection method was based on a competitive reaction between biotinylated VEGF conjugate and samples for specific VEGF antibody binding sites, giving an inverse relationship between absorbance and VEGF concentrations, which were expressed as pg/mL.

Cell Viability
Cell viability was measured using 3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide reduction method (56). After incubation with nicotine at 200 µg/mL for 5 hours, cells were incubated with 2.5% 3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide solution (5 mg/mL) for another 4 hours at 37°C. Thereafter, 0.04 mol/L HCl-isopropanol was added into the mixture and mixed thoroughly. The color change was recorded using spectrophotometry with the microplate reader (MRX, Dynex Technologies, Inc., Chantilly, VA) at 570 nm. The same test was repeated three times and the absorbance was calculated for statistical analysis.

Statistical Analysis
Results were expressed as mean ± SE. Statistical analysis was done using ANOVA followed by the Tukey t test. Ps < 0.05 were considered statistically significant.


    Notes
 Top
 Notes
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Results
 Discussion
 Materials and Methods
 References
 
Grant support: Committee on Research and Conference Grants of the University of Hong Kong and Hong Kong Research Grants Council HKU 7499/05M.

The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. This article must therefore be hereby marked advertisement in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.

Received 7/27/05; revised 10/13/05; accepted 11/ 1/05.


    References
 Top
 Notes
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Results
 Discussion
 Materials and Methods
 References
 

  1. Sasazuki S, Sasaki S, Tsugane S. Japan Public Health Center Study Group. Cigarette smoking, alcohol consumption and subsequent gastric cancer risk by subsite and histologic type. Int J Cancer 2002;101:560–6.[CrossRef][Medline]
  2. Stadtlander CT, Waterbor JW. Molecular epidemiology, pathogenesis and prevention of gastric cancer. Carcinogenesis 1999;20:2195–208.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  3. Tsurutani J, Castillo SS, Brognard J, et al. Tobacco components stimulate Akt-dependent proliferation and NF{kappa}B-dependent survival in lung cancer cells. Carcinogenesis 2005;26:1182–95. Epub ahead of print.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  4. Shin VY, Wu WK, Ye YN, et al. Nicotine promotes gastric tumor growth and neovascularization by activating extracellular signal-regulated kinase and cyclooxygenase-2. Carcinogenesis 2004;25:2487–95.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  5. Ye YN, Liu ES, Shin VY, Wu WK, Luo JC, Cho CH. Nicotine promoted colon cancer growth via epidermal growth factor receptor, c-Src, and 5-lipoxygenase-mediated signal pathway. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 2004;308:66–72.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  6. Hu PJ, Yu J, Zeng ZR, et al. Chemoprevention of gastric cancer by celecoxib in rats. Gut 2004;53:195–200.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  7. Saukkonen K, Rintahaka J, Sivula A, et al. Cyclooxygenase-2 and gastric carcinogenesis. APMIS 2003;111:915–25.[CrossRef][Medline]
  8. Griffioen AW, Barendsz-Janson AF, Mayo KH, Hillen HF. Angiogenesis, a target for tumor therapy. J Lab Clin Med 1998;132:363–8.[CrossRef][Medline]
  9. Papetti M, Herman IM. Mechanisms of normal and tumor-derived angiogenesis. Am J Physiol Cell Physiol 2002;282:C947–70.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  10. Ferrara N. VEGF and the quest for tumour angiogenesis factors. Nat Rev Cancer 2002;2:795–803.[CrossRef][Medline]
  11. Terman BI, Carrion ME, Kovacs E, Rasmussen BA, Eddy RL, Shows TB. Identification of a new endothelial cell growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase. Oncogene 1991;6:1677–83.[Medline]
  12. Wilting J, Birkenhager R, Eichmann A, et al. VEGF121 induces proliferation of vascular endothelial cells and expression of Flk-1 without affecting lymphatic vessels of chorioallantoic membrane. Dev Biol 1996;176:76–85.[CrossRef][Medline]
  13. Morin MJ. From oncogene to drug: development of small molecule tyrosine kinase inhibitors as anti-tumor and anti-angiogenic agents. Oncogene 2000;19:6574–83.[CrossRef][Medline]
  14. Jain RK. Tumor angiogenesis and accessibility: role of vascular endothelial growth factor. Semin Oncol 2002;29:3–9.[Medline]
  15. Zhang W, Ran S, Sambade M, Huang X, Thorpe PE. A monoclonal antibody that blocks VEGF binding to VEGFR2 (KDR/Flk-1) inhibits vascular expression of Flk-1 and tumor growth in an orthotopic human breast cancer model. Angiogenesis 2002;5:35–44.[CrossRef][Medline]
  16. Mignatti P, Rifkin DB. Biology and biochemistry of proteinases in tumor invasion. Physiol Rev 1993;73:161–95.[Free Full Text]
  17. Murphy G, Willenbrock F, Crabbe T, et al. Regulation of matrix metalloproteinase activity. Ann N Y Acad Sci 1994;732:31–41.[Medline]
  18. Stetler-Stevenson WG, Aznavoorian S, Liotta LA. Tumor cell interactions with the extracellular matrix during invasion and metastasis. Annu Rev Cell Biol 1993;9:541–73.[CrossRef][Medline]
  19. Kim HS, Kim MH, Jeong M, et al. EGCG blocks tumor promoter-induced MMP-9 expression via suppression of MAPK and AP-1 activation in human gastric AGS cells. Anticancer Res 2004;24:747–53.[Medline]
  20. Rolli M, Fransvea E, Pilch J, Saven A, Felding-Habermann B. Activated integrin {alpha}vß3 cooperates with metalloproteinase MMP-9 in regulating migration of metastatic breast cancer cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2003;100:9482–7.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  21. Yao M, Lam EC, Kelly CR, Zhou W, Wolfe MM. Cyclooxygenase-2 selective inhibition with NS-398 suppresses proliferation and invasiveness and delays liver metastasis in colorectal cancer. Br J Cancer 2004;90:712–9.[CrossRef][Medline]
  22. Suner IJ, Espinosa-Heidmann DG, Marin-Castano ME, Hernandez EP, Pereira-Simon S, Cousins SW. Nicotine increases size and severity of experimental choroidal neovascularization. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2004;45:311–7.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  23. Matsuoka T, Yashiro M, Sawada T, Ishikawa T, Ohira M, Chung KH. Inhibition of invasion and lymph node metastasis of gastrointestinal cancer cells by R-94138, a matrix metalloproteinase inhibitor. Anticancer Res 2000;20:4331–8.[Medline]
  24. Conklin BS, Zhao W, Zhong DS, Chen C. Nicotine and cotinine up-regulate vascular endothelial growth factor expression in endothelial cells. Am J Pathol 2002;160:413–8.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  25. Heeschen C, Jang JJ, Weis M, et al. Nicotine stimulates angiogenesis and promotes tumor growth and atherosclerosis. Nat Med 2001;7:833–9.[CrossRef][Medline]
  26. Lane D, Gray EA, Mathur RS, Mathur SP. Up-regulation of vascular endothelial growth factor-C by nicotine in cervical cancer cell lines. Am J Reprod Immunol 2005;53:153–8.[Medline]
  27. Barnes CJ, Cameron IL, Hardman WE, Lee M. Non-steroidol anti-inflammatory drug effect on crypt cell proliferation and apoptosis during initiation of rat colon carcinogenesis. Br J Cancer 1988;77:573–80.
  28. Gadek-Michalska A, Bugajski J, Bugajski AJ, Glod R. Effect of adrenergic antagonists and cyclooxygenase inhibitors on the nicotine-induced hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenocortical activity. J Physiol Pharmacol 2002;53:275–87.[Medline]
  29. Bugajski J, Gadek-Michalska A, Bugajski AJ. Involvement of prostaglandins in the nicotine-induced pituitary-adrenocortical response during social stress. J Physiol Pharmacol 2002;53:847–57.[Medline]
  30. Chang YC, Tsai CH, Yang SH, Liu CM, Chou MY. Induction of cyclooxygenase-2 mRNA and protein expression in human gingival fibroblasts stimulated with nicotine. J Periodontal Res 2003;38:496–501.[CrossRef][Medline]
  31. De Simone R, Ajmone-Cat MA, Carnevale D, Minghetti L. Activation of {alpha}7 nicotinic acetylcholine receptor by nicotine selectively up-regulates cyclooxygenase-2 and prostaglandin E2 in rat microglial cultures. J Neuroinflamm 2005;25:4.
  32. McCarty MF, Wey J, Stoeltzing O, et al. ZD6474, a vascular endothelial growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor with additional activity against epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase, inhibits orthotopic growth and angiogenesis of gastric cancer. Mol Cancer Ther 2004;3:1041–8.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  33. Shimizu K, Kubo H, Yamaguchi K, et al. Suppression of VEGFR-3 signaling inhibits lymph node metastasis in gastric cancer. Cancer Sci 2004;95:328–33.[CrossRef][Medline]
  34. Liu XE, Sun XD, Wu JM. Expression and significance of VEGF-C and FLT-4 in gastric cancer. World J Gastroenterol 2004;10:352–5.[Medline]
  35. Sini P, Wyder L, Schnell C, et al. The antitumor and antiangiogenic activity of vascular endothelial growth factor receptor inhibition is potentiated by ErbB1 blockade. Clin Cancer Res 2005;11:4521–32.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  36. Ding YB, Shi RH, Tong JD, et al. PGE2 up-regulates vascular endothelial growth factor expression in MKN28 gastric cancer cells via epidermal growth factor receptor signaling system. Exp Oncol 2005;27:108–13.[Medline]
  37. Zhi YH, Liu RS, Song MM, et al. Cyclooxygenase-2 promotes angiogenesis by increasing vascular endothelial growth factor and predicts prognosis in gallbladder carcinoma. World J Gastroenterol 2005;11:3724–8.[Medline]
  38. Li G, Yang T, Yan J. Cyclooxygenase-2 increased the angiogenic and metastatic potential of tumor cells. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 2002;299:886–90.[CrossRef][Medline]
  39. Wu CY, Wang CJ, Tseng CC, et al. Helicobacter pylori promote gastric cancer cells invasion through a NF-{kappa}B and COX-2-mediated pathway. World J Gastroenterol 2005;11:3197–203.[Medline]
  40. Gupta RA, Dubois RN. Colorectal cancer prevention and treatment by inhibition of cyclooxygenase-2. Nat Rev Cancer 2001;1:11–21.[CrossRef][Medline]
  41. Amano H, Hayashi I, Endo H, et al. Host prostaglandin E(2)-EP3 signaling regulates tumor-associated angiogenesis and tumor growth. J Exp Med 2003;197:221–32.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  42. Torii A, Kodera Y, Ito M, et al. Matrix metalloproteinase 9 in mucosally invasive gastric cancer. Gastric Cancer 1998;1:142–5.[CrossRef][Medline]
  43. Ajisaka H, Yonemura Y, Miwa K. Correlation of lymph node metastases and expression of matrix metalloproteinase-7 in patients with gastric cancer. Hepatogastroenterology 2004;51:900–5.[Medline]
  44. Nekarda H, Schmitt M, Ulm K, et al. Prognostic impact of urokinase-type plasminogen activator and its inhibitor PAI-1 in completely resected gastric cancer. Cancer Res 1994;54:2900–7.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  45. Ginestra A, Monea S, Seghezzi G, et al. Urokinase plasminogen activator and gelatinases are associated with membrane vesicles shed by human HT1080 fibrosarcoma cells. J Biol Chem 1997;272:17216–22.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  46. Choi YA, Lee DJ, Lim HK, et al. Interleukin-1ß stimulates matrix metalloproteinase-2 expression via a prostaglandin E2-dependent mechanism in human chondrocytes. Exp Mol Med 2004;36:226–32.[Medline]
  47. Rao NK, Shi GP, Chapman HA. Urokinase receptor is a multifunctional protein: influence of receptor occupancy on macrophage gene expression. J Clin Invest 1995;96:465–74.[Medline]
  48. Andrade SP, Machado RD, Teixeira AS, Belo AV, Tarso AM, Beraldo WT. Sponge-induced angiogenesis in mice and the pharmacological reactivity of the neovasculature quantitated by a fluorimetric method. Microvasc Res 1997;54:253–61.[CrossRef][Medline]
  49. Lawson GM, Hurt RD, Dale LC, et al. Application of urine nicotine and cotinine excretion rates to assessment of nicotine replacement in light, moderate, and heavy smokers undergoing transdermal therapy. J Clin Pharmacol 1998;38:510–6.[Abstract]
  50. Tones MA, Sharif NA, Hawthorne JN. Phospholipid turnover during cell-cycle traverse in synchronous Chinese-hamster ovary cells. Mitogenesis without phosphoinositide breakdown. Biochem J 1988;249:51–6.[Medline]
  51. Shin VY, Liu ES, Koo MW, Wang JY, Matsui H, Cho CH. Cigarette smoke extracts delay wound healing in the stomach: involvement of polyamine synthesis. Exp Biol Med (Maywood) 2002;227:114–24.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  52. Drabkin DS, Austin JH. Spectrophotometric constants for common hemoglobin derivatives in human, dog, and rabbit blood. J Biol Chem 1932;98:719–33.[Free Full Text]
  53. Albini A, Iwamoto Y, Kleinman HK, et al. A rapid in vitro assay for quantitating the invasive potential of tumor cells. Cancer Res 1987;47:3239–45.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  54. Tsujii M, Kawano S, Tsuji S, Sawaoka H, Hori M, DuBois RN. Cyclooxygenase regulates angiogenesis induced by colon cancer cells. Cell 1988;93:705–16.
  55. Creemers LB, Jansen ID, Docherty AJ, Reynolds JJ, Beertsen W, Everts V. Gelatinase A (MMP-2) and cysteine proteinases are essential for the degradation of collagen in soft connective tissue. Matrix Biol 1998;17:35–46.[Medline]
  56. Mosmann T. Rapid colorimetric assay for cellular growth and survival: application to proliferation and cytotoxicity assays. J Immunol Methods 1983;65:55–63.[CrossRef][Medline]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Cancer Res.Home page
C. Bergmann, L. Strauss, R. Zeidler, S. Lang, and T. L. Whiteside
Expansion of Human T Regulatory Type 1 Cells in the Microenvironment of Cyclooxygenase 2 Overexpressing Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma
Cancer Res., September 15, 2007; 67(18): 8865 - 8873.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Immunol.Home page
S. Razani-Boroujerdi, R. T. Boyd, M. I. Davila-Garcia, J. S. Nandi, N. C. Mishra, S. P. Singh, J. C. Pena-Philippides, R. Langley, and M. L. Sopori
T Cells Express {alpha}7-Nicotinic Acetylcholine Receptor Subunits That Require a Functional TCR and Leukocyte-Specific Protein Tyrosine Kinase for Nicotine-Induced Ca2+ Response
J. Immunol., September 1, 2007; 179(5): 2889 - 2898.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Clin. Cancer Res.Home page
Q. Zhang, X. Tang, Z.-F. Zhang, R. Velikina, S. Shi, and A. D. Le
Nicotine Induces Hypoxia-Inducible Factor-1{alpha} Expression in Human Lung Cancer Cells via Nicotinic Acetylcholine Receptor Mediated Signaling Pathways
Clin. Cancer Res., August 15, 2007; 13(16): 4686 - 4694.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Toxicol SciHome page
V. Y. Shin, W. K. K. Wu, K. M. Chu, M. W. L. Koo, H. P. S. Wong, E. K. Y. Lam, E. K. K. Tai, and C. H. Cho
Functional Role of {beta}-Adrenergic Receptors in the Mitogenic Action of Nicotine on Gastric Cancer Cells
Toxicol. Sci., March 1, 2007; 96(1): 21 - 29.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Shin, V. Y.
Right arrow Articles by Cho, C.-H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Shin, V. Y.
Right arrow Articles by Cho, C.-H.


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Cancer Research Clinical Cancer Research
Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention Molecular Cancer Therapeutics
Molecular Cancer Research Cancer Prevention Research
Cancer Prevention Journals Portal Cancer Reviews Online
Annual Meeting Education Book Meeting Abstracts Online