
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
Protein Has No Effect on Global Gene Silencing in Mouse Embryonic Stem Cells1
1 Ottawa Regional Cancer Centre and 2 University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Canada; and
3 Northwestern Regional Cancer Centre, Thunder Bay, Canada
Requests for reprints: Michael W. McBurney, Ottawa Regional Cancer Centre, 503 Smyth Road, Ottawa, K1H 1C4 Canada. Phone: (613) 737-7700x6887; Fax: (613) 247-3524. E-mail: michael.mcburney{at}orcc.on.ca
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
gene is closely related to its yeast homologue and encodes a nuclear protein expressed at particularly high levels in embryonic stem (ES) cells. We used homologous recombination to create ES cells null for sir2
and found that these cells did not have elevated levels of acetylated histones and did not ectopically express silent genes. Unlike yeast sir2 mutants, our sir2
null ES cells had normal sensitivity to insults such as ionizing radiation and heat shock, and they were able to silence invading retroviruses normally. These sir2
null cells were able to differentiate in culture normally. Our results failed to provide evidence that the mammalian SIR2
protein plays a role in gene silencing and suggest that the physiological substrate(s) for the SIR2
deacetylase may be nuclear proteins other than histones.
Key Words: targeted recombination gene inactivation retrovirus embryonic stem cell
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
In yeast, a protein required for silencing genes in each of the well-investigated paradigms is that encoded by sir2 (reviewed in Refs. 2, 6, 7). The ysir2p has NAD+-dependent histone deacetylase (HDAC) activity (811) that is essential for its gene silencing function and ysir2p resides in the cell as part of a multi-protein complex that binds to and inactivates specific regions of the chromatin (2, 3). In addition to its role in mediating gene silencing, the ysir2p also plays roles in a variety of other cellular functions including cell cycle regulation, DNA repair, and cellular senescence (7).
At least seven mammalian genes share a region homologous to the catalytic domain of the ysir2p (12, 13). Given the prevalence and importance of gene silencing in the mammalian genome and the multitude of cellular processes requiring ysir2p, we undertook to investigate the role of one of the mammalian homologues of sir2 to determine if this protein plays a role in mammalian cells similar to that of ysir2p. We chose the murine homologue most similar to ysir2, sir2
(14). Our approach was to create an embryonic stem (ES) cell carrying two null alleles for the sir2
gene and determine if this cell was compromised in its ability to silence genes and carry out DNA repair. The sir2
null ES cells were indistinguishable from their parent.
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Is Abundantly Expressed in ES Cells
cDNA (14) to probe a Northern blot of RNA derived from a variety of cell lines and tissues. The mRNA encoding sir2
is abundant in ES cells as well as in embryonal carcinoma (EC) cells but is expressed at much lower levels by fibroblast cells and mouse tissues (Fig. 1).
|
protein, we created a his-tagged SIR2
fusion protein in bacteria, purified it on Ni columns, and used the purified protein as an immunogen to make a rabbit antiserum. The fusion protein comprised 505 amino acids from the COOH-terminal end of the SIR2
sequence. The crude antiserum was immunoadsorbed and subsequently eluted from the purified his-SIR2
protein. This purified antiserum was used to stain fixed ES cells. The SIR2
protein was nuclear and distributed in a fine punctate pattern. SIR2
appeared to be excluded from the nucleolus and those regions of the nucleus called nuclear bodies that stained strongly with DNA stains such as Hoechst 33258 (Fig. 2). Nuclear bodies normally house proteins with roles in gene silencing so the exclusion of SIR2
from these structures suggests that the function of the mammalian protein might be distinct from that of the ysir2p. The distribution of SIR2
changed during mitosis. Between prophase and telophase, the protein was distributed in the cytoplasm and appeared to be excluded from the region of the condensed chromosomes. SIR2
was also detected at much lower levels in mouse fibroblasts where it had similar intranuclear distribution (data not shown).
|
protein has a predicted molecular mass of 80,371 Da and a pI of 4.60. The SDS-PAGE mobility of the SIR2
protein suggests a molecular mass of about 120 kDa. This might indicate extensive post-translational modification to the protein, but in vitro transcription and translation of the sir2
cDNA resulted in the synthesis of protein that ran on SDS-PAGE with apparent molecular mass of 120 kDa, indicating that the protein migrates aberrantly during electrophoresis. Two-dimensional gels confirmed that the immunoreactive SIR2
protein had the expected pI of about 4.6. The SIR2
protein was eluted from isolated nuclei with relatively low salt (75 mM), suggesting that it is not a tightly bound chromatin protein and the native SIR2
protein was recovered from gel filtration columns in the region of 160 kDa. We interpret this to mean that the mouse SIR2
protein is not a component of a large stable complex of proteins as is the case for the ysir2p (15). Rather, the mammalian SIR2
protein resembles that from Drosophila (16) and may be present in the nucleoplasm as a dimer.
Characteristics of sir2
Null ES Cells
To investigate the function of SIR2
, we created an ES cell in which the sir2
alleles were sequentially targeted with knockout vectors designed to delete exons 5 and 6 (17). Because these exons encode important parts of the catalytic domain, we expected that the targeted sir2
genes would be converted to null alleles and immunoblots of proteins isolated from the single and double knockouts confirmed the absence of SIR2
protein from the sir2
-/- cell and the presence of half normal levels of SIR2
protein in sir2
+/- cells (Fig. 3).
|
protein is nuclear and may play a role in the global regulation of gene expression, we set out to determine whether the sir2
null ES cells were able to differentiate in culture using the protocol normally employed for inducing differentiation. When aggregated and cultured as floating groups of cells, ES cells differentiate forming particularly large numbers of cells resembling extraembryonic endoderm characterized by the expression of cytokeratin 8 recognized by the TROMA-1 (18) antibody and the endoA cDNA (19, 20). Both the mRNA and protein are induced equally well in wild-type and sir2
null ES cells (Figs. 3 and 4). Similarly, another early differentiation marker, Brachyury, is also induced in the sir2
null cells. During the course of differentiation, the expression of the SIR2
protein and mRNA were down-regulated consistent with the observation that the levels of expression of sir2
are lower in differentiated tissues than in undifferentiated ES cells. In addition, the ES-specific Oct4 transcript was down-regulated in all cell lines during differentiation.
|
protein also has deacetylase activity on histone substrates (911, 14). To determine if the absence of the SIR2
protein in the null ES cells is accompanied by an increase in the level of histone acetylation, we analyzed the core histones on acid-urea gels looking for the extent of histone modification (Fig. 5). There was no apparent difference in global histone modification in the sir2
null ES cells while cells grown in the presence of an inhibitor of HDACs (trichostatin A) results in extensive histone hyperacetylation. Thus, it appears that the absence of SIR2
in ES cells has little effect on the overall level of histone acetylation. Yeast lacking the SIR2 protein have increased levels of acetylated histone H4 particularly in regions of the chromatin that are normally inactive (21). Mammalian cells have extensive regions of inactive chromatin so our result suggests that proteins other than histones may be the physiologically pertinent substrates for SIR2
.
|
null ES cells following exposure to ionizing radiation and found that it was not different from that of wild-type ES cells in clonogenic survival assays (Fig. 6). ES cells null for the Ku70 protein were, as expected, radiation sensitive (23), so the lack of sensitivity of the sir2
null ES cells to radiation suggests that SIR2
may not be associated with the non-homologous end joining repair pathway. Yeast lacking sir2 are sensitive to other stresses such as heat shock (24) but we found that the sir2
null ES cells had normal levels of killing following hyperthermia at 43°C (data not shown).
|
Null Cells
null ES cells to initiate and maintain gene silencing using the paradigm of retrovirus infection. It has been well established that infection of undifferentiated ES cells with retroviruses results in the integration of provirus into the genome but these proviruses are transcriptionally silent (25, 26). We used a Moloney leukemia virus-based ecotropic virus consisting of the long terminal repeat (LTR) driving enhanced green fluorescent protein (GFP). Following infection by the recombinant retrovirus, cells were expanded and assessed for fluorescence and the presence of the provirus in the genomic DNA of the cell population (Fig. 7). 3T3 cells were the positive control for this experiment and these cells became strongly fluorescent following infection at a multiplicity of about 10. None of the infected ES cells, including the sir2
null cells, were fluorescent. Analysis of the genomic DNA from the cultures of infected cells indicated the presence of provirus DNA (approximately 715 copies per cell) in both the expressing 3T3 cells and the non-expressing ES cells.
|
The above evidence suggests that the sir2
null ES cells are capable of silencing infecting retroviral DNAs but leaves open the possibility that the function of SIR2
is to regulate a subset of cellular genes. Indeed, recent work suggests that the Drosophila sir2 homologue may serve to effect down-regulation of genes controlled by members of the HES family of DNA binding proteins (28). To investigate the idea that SIR2
regulates a smaller set of cellular genes, we isolated RNA from wild-type R1 cells and the sir2
null clone and used DNA microarrays to determine whether there are differences in the endogenous genes expressed by these two cells. The vast majority of the 36,000 gene and EST sequences on the Affymetrix murine genome array U74v2 were not differentially expressed in the two cells. Of those genes that were differentially abundant by more than 2.5-fold, only 2 were up-regulated while 104 were down-regulated in the sir2
null cells. Some of the down-regulated genes are normally imprinted (SNRPN, gtl2/meg3) while one of the others was isolated as a transcript preferentially abundant in two-cell embryos (lo1). A number of the differentially expressed genes have been verified by Northern blot analysis and semiquantitative reverse transcription-PCR. Fig. 4 shows that some of the differentially expressed genes that are expressed in the parental R1 cells are not expressed in the sir2
null ES cells.
Regulation of p53 Function
There have been a number of recent reports that indicate that the SIR2
deacetylase activity can use acetylated p53 as a substrate and that the p53 transactivation function is modulated by the SIR2
protein (2931). Previous work with ES and EC cells established that p53 was present but irradiated cells did not arrest in G1, suggesting that p53 function was compromised in ES cells (32). If the idea is correct that SIR2
down-regulates p53 function, the high level of SIR2
in ES cells may explain why ES cells fail to arrest in G1 phase following irradiation. However, the studies implicating SIR2
in p53 regulation have all used assays derived from cells transfected with plasmids engineered to express SIR2
, p53, or both. Thus, the concentration of these proteins may be very high. To determine whether the SIR2
protein regulates p53 in ES cells expressing these proteins from their endogenous genes, we assessed the cellular response of wild-type and sir2
null ES cells to ionizing radiation.
Wild-type and sir2
null ES cells were irradiated with 10 Gy of X-rays and 12 h later, the cells were harvested to determine their distribution in the cell cycle and the amount of p53 protein. p53 protein was elevated in the irradiated cultures to the same extent in both wild-type and sir2
null cells (Fig. 8). In addition, in both cell types, the irradiated cells arrested in G2 phase despite the elevated level of p53. Thus, the absence of p53-mediated G1 arrest in ES cells is not due to the high level of SIR2
expression in these cells.
|
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
gene, mammalian ES cells lacking the SIR2
protein do not appear compromised in their ability to initiate or maintain genes in the inactive state. This conclusion is drawn from direct tests for ectopic expression of silent genes in sir2
null ES cells and from the ability of these cells to inactivate genes carried by recombinant retroviruses. sir2
null mice have been created (17) and their relatively mild phenotype is also consistent with the conclusion that SIR2
is not required for the cells to maintain genes in the transcriptionally inert state.
The distribution of SIR2
in the nucleus is consistent with its being associated with euchromatin. The Drosophila homologue of sir2 is also associated with actively transcribed regions of the genome (16, 33) although the protein may play a role in the down-regulation of genes mediated by certain transcription factors (28). A recent report (31) demonstrated association between the SIR2
protein and PML. PML is normally concentrated in the nuclear bodies and overexpression of PML in fibroblast cells resulted in the accumulation of SIR2
in the nuclear bodies (31). Our immunolocalization studies reported here and elsewhere (17) indicated that in ES cells, SIR2
is excluded from the nuclear bodies and this distribution did not change following X-irradiation or heat shock. This difference in distribution may be due to the fact that ES cells contain much higher levels of SIR2
than fibroblasts and that the amount of PML in ES cells is insufficient to result in visible accumulation of SIR2
in the nuclear bodies.
The absence of a phenotype affecting gene silencing in the sir2
null cells suggests either that the function of SIR2
in mammals is different from that of sir2 in yeast or that mammalian cells have redundant activities that mask the function of SIR2
. There are at least seven mammalian genes that share the conserved catalytic domain with sir2
; however, many of these homologues encode proteins that reside in the cytoplasm or mitochondria (3436), suggesting that at least some of these sir2 homologues are unlikely candidates for redundant activities. Mammalian cells also contain large numbers of HDACs that do reside in the nucleus (12). Two of these HDACs have been knocked out in mice (37, 38) creating phenotypes very different from the sir2
knockout (17), suggesting that there may be rather distinct functions for each HDAC.
Many nuclear proteins are acetylated (39) and the SIR2
enzyme has been shown to be able to deacetylate at least some of these (2931, 40). Particularly important amongst the possible substrates for SIR2
is p53. Acetylation of p53 is thought to be activating so the SIR2
activity would down-regulate the p53 transactivating function. This notion is attractive because the SIR2
protein is particularly abundant in ES cells and because ES cells do not display many of the p53-mediated functions despite the presence of normal p53 protein (32). However, sir2
null ES cells still do not respond to elevated p53 by G1 arrest, suggesting that there are other modulators of p53 activity in ES cells in addition to the SIR2
deacetylase.
| Materials and Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
in R1 cells have been described (17).
Ecotropic retroviruses were created by co-transfecting
2 cells (43) with the LTR-GFP construct shown in Fig. 7 along with Pgk-puro (44). Colonies were selected in 2 µg/ml puromycin and a number were picked and expanded. Culture supernatants from these clones were tested for virus titre and one clone selected for further expansion. Culture medium from this clone of transformed
2 cells was harvested, filtered through a 0.22-µm filter, and used to infect cells in 2 ml cultures containing 104 cells at a m.o.i. of about 10. Cultures were expanded for 7 days following infection and harvested for DNA isolation and flow cytometry to quantitate GFP expression in these cells. Flow cytometry was performed on dispersed cultures of live cells using fluorescene filter sets.
Cell irradiation was done using a 250-kV X-ray source (45). Survival was assessed by colony formation in cultures containing lethally irradiated (100 Gy) STO feeder fibroblasts in medium supplemented with 10-4 M ß-mercaptoethanol. DNA content of cells was determined by propidium iodide staining as described (32).
Immunodetection
Immunofluorescence experiments were carried out on ES cells grown on coverslips essentially as described (46). Western blots were carried out also as described (47).
The rabbit antibody to the SIR2
protein was raised against bacterially synthesized and purified recombinant his-tagged SIR2
by Research Genetics, Inc. (Huntsville, AL). One of the two rabbits immunized had a significant titre of antiserum that was immunopurified before use by absorption and elution from nitrocellulose strips containing purified his-tagged SIR2
protein.
Nucleic Acid Procedures
Standard manipulation of plasmid DNAs was carried out according to the usual protocols (47). DNA was isolated from cells and tissues as described (48) and was digested with restriction enzymes under conditions recommended by the manufacturer before being subject to electrophoresis and blotting. Isolated DNA fragments were radiolabeled with 32P-dCTP by oligonucleotide priming and these were used to probe the blots (47). RNA was isolated using TRIzol (Invitrogen Life Technologies, Inc., Carlsbad, CA) and electrophoresed, blotted, and probed as described (49).
| Acknowledgements |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| Notes |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Received September 26, 2002; revised January 24, 2003; accepted January 31, 2003.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
protein has a role in embryogenesis and gametogenesis. Mol. Cell Biol., 23: 3854, 2003.
promotes cell survival under stress. Cell, 107: 137148, 2001.[Medline]
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
S. A. Gatz and L. Wiesmuller Take a break--resveratrol in action on DNA Carcinogenesis, February 1, 2008; 29(2): 321 - 332. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. M. Solomon, R. Pasupuleti, L. Xu, T. McDonagh, R. Curtis, P. S. DiStefano, and L. J. Huber Inhibition of SIRT1 Catalytic Activity Increases p53 Acetylation but Does Not Alter Cell Survival following DNA Damage Mol. Cell. Biol., January 1, 2006; 26(1): 28 - 38. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. Michishita, J. Y. Park, J. M. Burneskis, J. C. Barrett, and I. Horikawa Evolutionarily Conserved and Nonconserved Cellular Localizations and Functions of Human SIRT Proteins Mol. Biol. Cell, October 1, 2005; 16(10): 4623 - 4635. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
N. Matsushita, Y. Takami, M. Kimura, S. Tachiiri, M. Ishiai, T. Nakayama, and M. Takata Role of NAD-dependent deacetylases SIRT1 and SIRT2 in radiation and cisplatin-induced cell death in vertebrate cells Genes Cells, April 1, 2005; 10(4): 321 - 332. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. Sereno, A. M. Alegre, R. Silvestre, B. Vergnes, and A. Ouaissi In Vitro Antileishmanial Activity of Nicotinamide Antimicrob. Agents Chemother., February 1, 2005; 49(2): 808 - 812. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. Daitoku, M. Hatta, H. Matsuzaki, S. Aratani, T. Ohshima, M. Miyagishi, T. Nakajima, and A. Fukamizu Silent information regulator 2 potentiates Foxo1-mediated transcription through its deacetylase activity PNAS, July 6, 2004; 101(27): 10042 - 10047. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. W. Buck, C. M. Gallo, and J. S. Smith Diversity in the Sir2 family of protein deacetylases J. Leukoc. Biol., June 1, 2004; 75(6): 939 - 950. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H.-L. Cheng, R. Mostoslavsky, S.'i. Saito, J. P. Manis, Y. Gu, P. Patel, R. Bronson, E. Appella, F. W. Alt, and K. F. Chua Developmental defects and p53 hyperacetylation in Sir2 homolog (SIRT1)-deficient mice PNAS, September 16, 2003; 100(19): 10794 - 10799. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| Cancer Research | Clinical Cancer Research |
| Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention | Molecular Cancer Therapeutics |
| Molecular Cancer Research | Cancer Prevention Research |
| Cancer Prevention Journals Portal | Cancer Revie |