
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
Cancer Research Institute, Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA
Requests for reprints: Emma Shtivelman, Cancer Research Institute, Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California San Francisco, 2340 Sutter Street, San Francisco, CA 94115. Phone: (415) 502-1985; Fax: (415) 502-3179. E-mail: eshtivel{at}cc.ucsf.edu
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The dual-specificity phosphatase PTEN dephosphorylates PI (3,4,5)-P and therefore acts as negative regulator of PKB (reviewed in Ref. 6). PTEN is frequently lost or inactivated in human tumors (7), which underscores the importance of PKB activation in tumorigenesis. In addition to the survival and G1-S-promoting activities of PKB, recent evidence demonstrates that PKB participates in regulation of the G2-M transition. Activity of PKB is increased in the G2-M phase of cell cycle in epithelial cells and is necessary for the timely progression through mitosis (8). Inhibition of the PI3K/PKB pathway prevents or delays the transition from G2 to mitosis and results in apoptosis of cells arrested in G2. PKB plays a key role in these events because expression of a constitutively active PKB (caPKB), which is unresponsive to phosphatidylinositol signaling, alleviates all the effects of PI3K inhibition in G2-M (8).
To monitor genomic integrity, cells are equipped with a variety of checkpoint mechanisms that are frequently compromised in tumors. The G2 DNA damage checkpoint prevents mitotic entry when DNA is damaged, therefore guarding against genomic instability. The G1-S checkpoint is often inactivated in tumors due to the functional deficiency of p53, and abrogation of G2 checkpoint has emerged as an attractive target for tumor therapy. Because PKB is frequently activated in a variety of human tumors and because of its role in the regulation of G2-M transition, I examined the effects of activated PKB on the G2 DNA damage checkpoint and identified a potential mechanism for these effects.
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
Cell cycle progression of MDCK clones was analyzed also at 24 h after irradiation. In MDCKneo cells, the rate of mitosis was very low and fewer cells than normally had a 4n DNA content, indicating suppressed proliferation. In MDCKcaPKB cells, both parameters were significantly higher (Fig. 1B). Treatment with nocodazole for the last 12 h allowed to calculate total number of cells that entered mitosis after first 12 h of irradiation as well as to estimate percent of cells remaining arrested in G1. Within the second 12 h after irradiation, 4% of MDCKneo cells entered mitosis compared with 42% of MDCKcaPKB cells. This dramatic difference in mitotic rates could be ascribed in part to the fact that significantly more MDCKneo cells remained arrested in G1 (Fig. 1B, bottom panel). However, of cells arrested with 4n amount of DNA, only a small minority overcame G2 arrest (4% of 32%). In contrast to control cells, more than half (42% of 75%) of MDCKcaPKB cells with 4n amount of DNA were in mitosis. Clearly, introduction of caPKB into MDCK cells leads to the abrogation of both G1 and G2 DNA damage checkpoints.
Breast carcinoma MCF7 clones, control (neo) and expressing caPKB, were
-irradiated or treated with the DNA damaging drug Adriamycin. Mitotic activity in MCF7 cells after these treatments ceased temporarily and resumed at later time points; however, in MCFcaPKB cells, resumption of mitosis occurred earlier and with higher frequency (data not shown). At 18 h, mitotic indices were significantly higher in treated MCFcaPKB than MCFneo cells (Fig. 1C). Treatment of cells with nocodazole after irradiation was used to calculate the total number of cells that overcame the G2 delay and entered mitosis within 18 h. As shown in Fig. 1D, the number of cells entering mitosis was reduced in irradiated MCFneo clones >2-fold compared with unirradiated nocodazole-treated cultures. However, in MCFcaPKB cells, the number of cells entering mitosis after irradiation was reduced only by about 20% (Fig. 1D), indicating that the G2 DNA damage checkpoint is severely compromised by caPKB. MCF7 cells undergo both transient G1 and G2 arrest after DNA damage, and these data show that the G2 arrest is compromised by caPKB. However, the partial G1 arrest observed in MCF7 cells was not affected by caPKB (data not shown).
PKB has been extensively characterized as a kinase with strong antiapoptotic activity (reviewed in Ref. 4). Having established that caPKB compromises the G2 DNA damage checkpoint, I have examined the consequences of its expression for the long-term survival and proliferation of cells after DNA damage using a colony-forming assay. Interestingly, the colony-forming capacity of MCFcaPKB cells in absolute numbers was higher than that of MCFneo cells (average of 10.2% vs. 4.8% for MCFneo, respectively), indicating an advantage conferred by caPKB expression for survival and/or proliferation of plated isolated cells. However, colony survival rate of MCFcaPKB cells after treatment with
-irradiation or Adriamycin was actually somewhat lower than that of MCFneo cells (Fig. 2). No significant differences were observed in the long-term survival of MDCKneo and MDCKcaPKB cells subjected to DNA damage (data not shown), although, as with MCF7 cells, caPKB enhanced the colony-forming potential of untreated MDCK cells. In addition, MCFcaPKB and MDCKcaPKB clones transiently treated with staurosporine, a potent inducer of apoptosis, had a 10-fold higher long-term survival rate than control (neo) clones (data not shown). Therefore, the antiapoptotic activity of caPKB is well expressed but is not protective in the context of DNA damage.
|
First, I examined the effect of PKB-ER on irradiation-induced G2 arrest. HeLa cells undergo a transient G2 arrest resolved eventually through mitosis. Induction of PKB-ER in stably transfected clonal populations of HeLa-PKB-ER did not affect mitotic indices of unirradiated cultures (Fig. 3A). However, the G2 delay observed after irradiation of uninduced HeLa cells was compromised in 4OHT-treated cells expressing activated PKB-ER (Fig. 3A). DNA content analysis showed that HeLa-PKB-ER cells resolved the irradiation-induced accumulation of cells with 4n amount of DNA faster when expression of PKB-ER was induced (data not shown). As a control for possible undesirable effects of tamoxifen, identical experiments were performed using HeLa cells and a vector-transfected control clone of HeLa with and without tamoxifen treatment. Mitotic responses to irradiation of these control cell populations were not affected by treatment with tamoxifen and were identical to these of HeLa-PKB-ER cells in the absence of tamoxifen (data not shown).
|
Activation of Exogenous PKB After DNA Damage Correlates With Accumulation and Activation of Plk1
Having observed that exogenously expressed PKB prevents inhibition of Plk1 by DNA damage, I examined possible correlation between activities of endogenous Plk1 and PKB. Cells lines chosen for this analysis were osteosarcoma U2OS that respond to irradiation by a strong and lasting G2 arrest and a glioblastoma line U373 that resolves the G2 arrest through mitotic progression (Fig. 4). PKB activity was found to be very low in untreated U2OS cells by Western blot analysis with a phosphospecific antibody to phospho-Ser 473 (Fig. 4). After irradiation, PKB activity dropped to levels undetectable by Western blot analysis with this antibody and became marginally higher 2 days later as confirmed by direct measurement of kinase activity in vitro (Fig. 4). Plk1 activity remained low in U2OS cells throughout the course of experiment (Fig. 4) in agreement with published results (16). During normal cell cycle progression, cells reaching G2 phase accumulate high levels of Plk1. However, in irradiated U2OS, although majority of cells arrested in G2, the levels of Plk1 protein were not elevated (Fig. 4). I suggest that lack of Plk1 activation in G2-arrested U2OS cells is a direct consequence of the low Plk1 protein levels, and this could be related to the strong G2 arrest.
|
To further illustrate the differences between G2 responses to DNA damage in U2OS and U373 cells, nocodazole treatment after irradiation was used to examine cumulative Plk1 activity and levels (Fig. 5). There was only a minimal reduction in both Plk1 activity and levels in irradiated U373 cells compared with control unirradiated cultures, further demonstrating that Plk1 activity is not subject to inhibition after DNA damage in U373. In a stark contrast to U373 cells, in U2OS cells, both levels and activity of Plk1 were dramatically inhibited by irradiation.
|
CHFR, a Mitotic Checkpoint Protein and an E3 Ubiquitin Ligase for Plk1, Is a PKB Substrate in Vitro and in Vivo
Data in Figs. 4 and 5 suggest that inhibition of Plk1 activity by DNA damage might be directly related to the failure of the G2-arrested irradiated cells such as U2OS to accumulate high levels of Plk1 protein normally found in G2 (21, 22). A negative regulatory mechanism for controlling Plk1 levels was identified recently (23) that involves the mitotic checkpoint protein CHFR (24). CHFR delays mitotic entry of cells subjected to mitotic stress such as interference with microtubule polymerization or stability (24). CHFR was shown to possess an E3 ubiquitin ligase activity that is specific for Plk1 protein (23). Overexpressed CHFR can ubiquitinate Plk1 and lead to its degradation in Xenopus extracts (23). CHFR protein contains a forkhead-associated domain (FHA) at its NH2 terminus (24), and several FHA proteins were shown to be direct phosphorylation targets of PKB (reviewed in Ref. 25). Indeed, the MotifScan search of human CHFR sequence predicted two high probability consensus phosphorylation sites for PKB at both ends of the FHA domain of CHFR (Thr 39 and Ser 205), a localization similar to that shown for the PKB-phosphorylated sites in forkhead transcription factors (25). Using in vitro phosphorylation assays, I found that a baculovirus-expressed partially purified PKB protein phosphorylated the glutathione S-transferase (GST)-CHFR fusion protein. When T39A and S205A substitutions were introduced into CHFR protein, phosphorylation was strongly reduced (Fig. 6A).
|
To further demonstrate that CHFR is phosphorylated by PKB in vivo, I have transfected CHFR into HeLa-PKB-ER cells in the absence or presence of tamoxifen and analyzed phosphorylation of T39. As shown in Fig. 6C, phosphorylation on T39 was increased when expression of activated PKB was induced, suggesting that PKB is indeed responsible for the phosphorylation of Thr 39 in CHFR.
Because CHFR is an E3 ubiquitin ligase and auto-ubiquitinates in vivo (20), I have examined if this activity of CHFR is affected by the phosphorylation status on T39 and S205. Proteins expressed from wild-type CHFR, TASA mutant, and I306A mutant (the RING finger domain mutant deficient in ubiquitin ligase activity; 23) were immunoprecipitated from transiently transfected HEK293 cells and analyzed for the presence of ubiquitin conjugates. These were detected in both wild-type and TASA mutant but not in I306 mutant (Fig. 6D). Moreover, the amount of ubiquitinated species detected in CHFR-TASA was not reduced compared with the wild-type CHFR protein, although expression levels of TASA are consistently and significantly lower than levels of the wild-type protein (Fig. 6, B and D). Inhibition of CHFR phosphorylation by PKB might therefore lead to an increase in CHFR ubiquitin ligase activity and could account for the lower expression of transfected CHFR-TASA due to faster degradation.
To examine in a more direct manner how phosphorylation by PKB might affect auto-ubiquitination of CHFR, CHFR and TASA were transfected into HeLa-PKB-ER cells in the absence and presence of tamoxifen. Presence of ubiquitinated conjugates was examined in immunoprecipitated CHFR proteins. Ubiquitin conjugation of CHFR was somewhat inhibited when activity of PKB-ER was induced (Fig. 6E), suggesting that phosphorylation by PKB has a negative effect on the E3 ligase activity of CHFR.
CHFR Protein That Cannot Be Phosphorylated by PKB Inhibits Entry Into Mitosis
Wild-type CHFR and CHFR-TASA were transiently transfected into HeLa cells to examine their effect on Plk1 levels, kinase activity, and mitotic activity of cells. Expression of exogenous CHFR-TASA but not wild-type CHFR lead to a noticeable decrease in Plk1 levels and its activity (Fig. 7A). Activity of Plk1 precipitated from cells transfected with CHFR-TASA was 40% of Plk1 activity from mock-transfected or wild-type CHFR-transfected cells (average of three experiments). Considering that only about 3040% of HeLa cells were transfected in these experiments (data not shown), these results are significant.
|
Mitotic indices were calculated specifically in transfected cells that were identified by expression of the cotransfected enhanced green fluorescent protein (EGFP). The wild-type CHFR had no effect on the frequency of mitoses (Fig. 7B). However, a significant reduction in mitotic indices was observed in cells transfected with the mutant CHFR-TASA (Fig. 7B). Transfected HeLa cultures were
-irradiated and harvested 18 h after irradiation. This time was chosen because in HeLa cells mitotic activity is highest at 1620 h after irradiation and eventually results in resolution of the G2 arrest (data not shown). Cells expressing CHFR-TASA but not wild-type CHFR had a significantly lower rate of mitosis, indicating that the G2 arrest is enforced by CHFR-TASA (Fig. 7B). These results show that CHFR not phosphorylated by PKB contributes to inhibition of the G2-M transition under both normal conditions and when DNA is damaged.
The effect of CHFR-TASA on mitotic entry under conditions of mitotic stress was also examined. After taxol treatment (Fig. 7B) and nocodazole treatment (data not shown), both wild-type and mutant CHFR were able to inhibit mitotic entry. I have also used the RING finger mutant of CHFR (23) and found that transient expression of CHFR-I306A had no effect on mitosis under any of conditions (data not shown).
These results suggest that phosphorylation of CHFR by PKB might inhibit its ability to enforce DNA damage-induced G2 arrest but could be irrelevant to its function as a mitotic checkpoint. The E3 ligase activity of CHFR is necessary for inhibition of transition to mitosis under all conditions as the RING finger domain mutant has no effect on chromosomal condensation under any conditions tested.
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
While this manuscript was in preparation, a report was published that demonstrated a role for activated PKB in abrogation of the G2 DNA damage checkpoint (27). Experiments reported here lead to similar conclusions about the negative effect of activated PKB on the DNA damage-induced G2 arrest. Deregulated activity of PKB promotes early mitotic entry of cells with damaged DNA (i.e., leads to the abrogation of G2 arrest). Kandel et al. (27) reported protection from DNA damage-induced apoptosis by myristoylated Akt in Rat1a cells. I found that the caPKB lacking the PH domain does not protect cells from death induced by DNA damage, although it confers a survival advantage after non-DNA damaging cytotoxic treatments. On the contrary, MCF7 clones with caPKB had a somewhat lower survival rate after DNA damage inflicted by irradiation of Adriamycin in long-term assays. These differences could be due to the different forms of PKB used. Indeed, the caPKB used in this study is apparently not subject to any known form of regulation of PKB activity and is truly constitutively active being independent of PIP3 binding, membrane recruitment, and phosphorylation by 3'-phosphoinositide-dependent protein kinase-1 (9). Apparently, by promoting mitosis soon after DNA damage, caPKB contributes to the frequency of mitotic catastrophe that leads to increased cell death through a nonapoptotic pathway.
I suggest that activated PKB in tumor cells actually affects the resolution of the DNA damage-induced G2 arrest rather than establishment of the initial G2 arrest. It was shown that the cessation of mitotic activity within first 1 or 2 h after irradiation is an ataxia telangiectasia mutated (ATM)-dependent process that represents failure of cells that are in G2 during irradiation to enter mitosis (28). I have not observed significant effects of activated PKB on the mitotic activity at 2 h after irradiation in MDCK, MCF7, or HeLa-PKB-ER cells (data not shown). However, activated PKB promotes mitosis after the initial checkpoint response, indicating that it might affect an ATM/ATM and Rad3 related (ATR)-independent step in the resolution of the G2 arrest.
This study identifies a likely G2-M target of PKB and provides one possible mechanism of how PKB positively regulates normal G2-M transition and inhibits DNA damage-induced G2 arrest. Data reported here suggest that the abrogating effect of activated PKB on the G2 arrest is mediated at least in part through alleviation of the Plk1 inhibition that follows DNA damage (16). Suppression of Plk1 activation appears to be a conserved mechanism for preventing mitotic division when DNA is damaged. Inhibition of Cdc5, the yeast homologue of Plk1, was shown to be involved in the prevention of mitotic exit after DNA damage (29). Regulation of Plk1 activity occurs at multiple levels: Plk1 protein accumulates in the G2-M phase of cell cycle (14, 15) and is degraded at the exit from mitosis by the anaphase-promoting complex (21). In addition, activation of the Plk1 kinase in G2-M involves phosphorylation (30, 31).
Plk1 protein can apparently be degraded before the onset of mitosis in the presence of high levels of the ubiquitin ligase CHFR at least in Xenopus extracts (23). CHFR was originally described as a mitotic checkpoint protein (24) capable of delaying or preventing entry into mitosis. Expression of CHFR is frequently absent in tumors due to hypermethylation (3235). My results show that the checkpoint function of CHFR in DNA damage but not in mitotic stress responses is regulated by PKB that directly phosphorylates CHFR on Thr 39. Phosphorylation of CHFR by PKB appears to negatively affect its activity as an ubiquitin ligase. Unphosphorylated CHFR (TASA mutant) shows a constitutive checkpoint function and prevents mitotic transition even under normal conditions.
These data suggest a simple mechanism that can explain at least partially the PKB effects on G2-M transition both under normal growth conditions and after DNA damage (Fig. 7C). Under normal conditions, an unknown mechanism induces high PKB activity in G2-M (9) that results in the inhibition of CHFR checkpoint activity possibly through negative effect on its E3 ligase activity. This is supported by the data that CHFR-TASA auto-ubiquitinates at a higher rate than the wild-type CHFR (Fig. 6D) and that in the presence of activated PKB, CHFR appears to contain less ubiquitin conjugates (Fig. 6E). When the ubiquitin ligase activity of CHFR is suppressed through phosphorylation by PKB, Plk1 protein can accumulate, undergo activating phosphorylation, and promote the G2-M transition. DNA damage might act to prevent the increase in PKB activity in G2 by unknown mechanisms (Fig. 7C, question mark on the left), therefore allowing expression of the checkpoint function of CHFR that results in ubiquitination and degradation of Plk1 and a consequent arrest in G2. DNA damage also could lead to inhibition of Plk1 kinase activity in ATM/ATR-dependent manner (17) via yet unidentified factors (Fig. 7C, question mark on the right). In tumor cells such as U373 where tumor suppressor PTEN is inactive, DNA damage apparently does not inhibit activation of PKB. PKB activity increases as cells start to accumulate in G2 after irradiation, possibly contributing to increase in Plk1 levels and activity and G2-M transition. In U2OS cells, PKB activity remains low as cells accumulate in G2 after DNA damage, although PKB activity is high in normal G2-M (data not shown). U2OS cells express CHFR. Although CHFR from U2OS cells was initially reported to be a mutant form (24), the single nucleotide change in U2OS CHFR was found to represent a common polymorphism (32). Therefore, CHFR may possibly be involved in regulation of Plk1 levels in U2OS cells after DNA damage.
Data show that while CHFR phosphorylated by PKB on T39 can prevent chromosome condensation in response to interference with microtubule dynamics, it does not inhibit mitotic transition in response to DNA damage. Only the version that cannot be phosphorylated by PKB is able to prevent mitotic transition after DNA damage and even under normal conditions acting as a constitutive checkpoint. The role of the FHA domain would appear to be different in responses of CHFR protein to different types of stress.
CHFR is likely to be not the only G2-M target of PKB. A role was described for transcription factor FOXO3a, a PKB target, in the G2-M delay induced by stress and DNA damage repair (36). Published results (8) and work in progress strongly suggest a direct modulation (inhibition) of the activity of the DNA damage effector kinase Chk1 by activated PKB. Other G2-M substrates of PKB remain to be identified.
Regulation of the G2 DNA damage responses is very complex (37) and findings described here and by others (27) add an extra layer of complexity to it by implicating a major signal transduction pathway in the abrogation of the DNA damage-induced G2 arrest. Deregulation of the PI3K/PKB pathway is a frequent event in tumorigenesis (38), and effects of activated PKB on G2 checkpoint could have profound consequences for the tumor cell responses to DNA damage.
| Materials and Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Plasmids and Antibodies
Plasmids used for transfections were pCS-mycCHFR (a gift of G. Fang), pWZLneoAkt-ER (a gift of M. McMahon), and pEGFP-C1 (Clontech Laboratories, Inc., Palo Alto, CA). pWZLneoAkt-ER contains sequences of human PKB/Akt1 with the PH domain substituted by myristoylation signal of human c-src (18). Mutations T39A and S215A were introduced into pCS-mycCHFR and pGEX-CHFR according to standard procedures. Antibodies used were rabbit anti-PKB (Upstate Biotechnology, Inc., Charlottesville, VA) for Western blot analysis, goat anti-PKB (Santa Cruz Biotechnologies, Santa Cruz, CA) for immunoprecipitation and kinase activity assays, anti-pS473-PKB (gift of D. Stokoe) for Western blotting, anti-Plk1 cocktail (Zymed, South San Francisco, CA) for Western blotting, rabbit anti-Plk1 for immunoprecipitation (Santa Cruz Biotechnologies), and mouse anti-myc 9E10 and anti-ubiquitin (Calbiochem, San Diego, CA).
Mitotic Spread Preparation and Quantitation
For mitotic spreads, cells were harvested by trypsinization, washed in PBS, incubated 10 min in 75-mM KCl, pelleted, and incubated in freshly prepared Carnoy fixative (methanol/acetic acid, 3:1) for another 10 min. Cells were dropped on glass slides, and after drying, DNA was stained with 4',6-diamidino-2-phenyindole. To determine the percentage of cells in mitosis, at least 400 cells were counted. Mitotic indices were calculated as number of cells with condensed chromosomes divided by total number of cells. Cells transfected with pEGFP were cytospinned to preserve the GFP protein within cells and fixed with 2% buffered paraformaldehyde. Cells on slides were treated with 0.1-µg/ml propidium iodide and 10-µg/ml RNase A in PBS for 15 min at room temperature and 300400 transfected GFP-positive cells were counted for determination of mitotic indices specifically within transfected populations. In some assays, a parallel determination of mitotic cells was performed through staining of the fixed cells with the MPM2 antibody (UBI, Long Island, NY) and flow cytometric analysis.
Kinase Activity Assays
Cell lysates were prepared in kinase lysis buffer: 125-mM NaCl, 50-mM Tris (pH 7.5), 1-mM EDTA, 1-mM EGTA, 10-mM sodium ß-glycerophosphate, 1-mM NaVO4, 10-mM NaF, 1-mM DTT, 10% glycerol, and protease inhibitor cocktail (Roche). Active kinases (Plk1 or PKB) were precipitated with appropriate antibodies, and immunoprecipitates were collected on protein G-Sepharose (Life Technologies, Inc., Carlsbad, CA) and washed thrice in kinase lysis buffer and twice in kinase buffer (50-mM NaCl, 50-mM Tris [pH 7.5], 1-mM EDTA, and 1-mM DTT). Dephosphorylated
-casein (Sigma Chemical Co., St. Louis, MO) was used as a substrate for Plk1 and GST-AHNAK-C213 for PKB (39) in kinase reaction containing 10-µM ATP and 5-µCi [32P]
-ATP. Reactions were resolved by PAGE. Incorporation of 32P into substrates was quantified using PhosphorImager.
Phosphospecific Antibodies
Antibodies were raised in rabbits against phosphopeptide LLRKREWpTIGRRRGC corresponding to positions 3246 in the sequence of human CHFR. Immune serum was affinity purified on a column of phosphopeptide immobilized on Sulfolink (Pierce Chemical Co., Rockford, IL). Prior to use in Western blotting, antibodies were preincubated with an excess of a peptide identical to the immunizing peptide, except that Thr 39 was not phosphorylated.
| Acknowledgements |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| Notes |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Received April 29, 2003; revised October 3, 2003; accepted October 21, 2003.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
L. M. Privette, M. E. Gonzalez, L. Ding, C. G. Kleer, and E. M. Petty Altered Expression of the Early Mitotic Checkpoint Protein, CHFR, in Breast Cancers: Implications for Tumor Suppression Cancer Res., July 1, 2007; 67(13): 6064 - 6074. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. Matsusaka and J. Pines Chfr acts with the p38 stress kinases to block entry to mitosis in mammalian cells J. Cell Biol., August 16, 2004; 166(4): 507 - 516. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J.-H. Yuan, Y. Feng, R. H. Fisher, S. Maloid, D. L. Longo, and D. K. Ferris Polo-Like Kinase 1 Inactivation Following Mitotic DNA Damaging Treatments Is Independent of Ataxia Telangiectasia Mutated Kinase Mol. Cancer Res., July 1, 2004; 2(7): 417 - 426. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| Cancer Research | Clinical Cancer Research |
| Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention | Molecular Cancer Therapeutics |
| Molecular Cancer Research | Cancer Prevention Research |
| Cancer Prevention Journals Portal | Cancer Reviews Online |
| Annual Meeting Education Book | Meeting Abstracts Online |